It's not true, but it is: the president with a Mercedes after Rusina to Isola, then with a concussion and a broken collarbone to the shopping

Slovenian President Nataša Pirc Musar purchased a residential apartment in Ljubljana in 2012, which is currently owned by her business associate Viktorija Krivolucka, a Russian-Slovenian citizen. The property, located at Šarhova 30, was bought for €118,000 and has been confirmed through public property records. According to reports, Krivolucka still resides there today. Krivolucka has had a long-standing personal and professional relationship with Pirc Musar, including roles as a company director and co-champion in bowling. The ownership transfer from Pirc Musar to Krivolucka’s company, Ruska dača, raises questions about legal and tax implications, particularly regarding whether Krivolucka pays rent or receives benefits under some form of arrangement. The issue gained renewed attention following a traffic accident involving Pirc Musar's official vehicle on July 31, 2026, near the Kastelec toll station on the Primorska highway. During the incident, Pirc Musar suffered a broken collarbone while Krivolucka sustained more severe injuries. The president’s office initially delayed disclosing details about the passengers in the car, citing the need to avoid spreading unverified information. It later confirmed that two of Pirc Musar’s friends were in the vehicle, one of whom was Krivolucka. This revelation sparked public debate over the nature of their relationship and the potential influence of Krivolucka’s dual citizenship. Pirc Musar addressed the media controversy surrounding the accident, expressing frustration over the intense scrutiny she faced. She acknowledged her mistake of not wearing a seatbelt and stated she would pay the fine resulting from the violation. She emphasized that she is not immune to human emotions and expressed deep concern for Krivolucka’s well-being, despite the latter being labeled as a "Russian spy." Pirc Musar defended her decision to travel with Krivolucka, stating that legally, individuals have the right to privacy even within official vehicles, and questioned why such matters are considered relevant to public interest. The incident also reignited discussions about the legal framework governing the protection of high-profile individuals. Police chief Matoz indicated that changes might be proposed to adjust the current security protocols for the president, though final decisions would rest with the government. Meanwhile, constitutional lawyer Peter Jambrek suggested that the situation could potentially lead to a constitutional complaint against Pirc Musar, citing concerns over national security due to Krivolucka’s Russian nationality. However, Jambrek clarified he himself does not draft such complaints. Public reaction to these developments has been mixed. While some criticize Pirc Musar for her associations and handling of the incident, others support her stance on personal freedom and privacy. The ongoing discourse highlights broader issues related to transparency, accountability, and the balance between individual rights and national interests. As investigations continue and further details emerge, the situation remains dynamic, with continued public interest in how these events will unfold.