New accusations in UKC Maribor: EMG's infirmary reportedly treats twice as many patients in the afternoon

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive4 hr. ago

An article reports on allegations of irregularities at the University Clinical Center (UKC) in Maribor, Slovenia, regarding the handling of EMG examinations during different shifts. According to anonymous nurses using photos from the information system MEDIS, patients officially scheduled for afternoon sessions were treated earlier in the morning. The article highlights discrepancies in workload, with up to 30 exams conducted in the afternoon compared to 15 in the morning. It mentions that staff receive higher pay for afternoon work, which some describe as a common practice in Slovenian hospitals. The financial situation of the Maribor hospital is noted as deteriorating, with losses reaching nearly 10 million euros by mid-year. Authorities have launched an investigation, and the Ministry of Health has requested explanations. The article also draws parallels to a previous scandal involving radiologist Mitja Rupreht, who performed exams outside his working hours. Critics argue this reflects systemic issues requiring new regulations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic problem within the healthcare system, highlighting financial mismanagement and unethical practices. It emphasizes the exploitation of workers through differential pay rates and criticizes institutional failures. While it does not overtly criticize specific政

VečerIndependent🔒Progressive7 hr. ago

The article reports on allegations of irregularities at the UKC Maribor neurology clinic regarding the scheduling and execution of EMG tests. According to records from the Medis system, some tests reportedly scheduled for the afternoon in the additional program were actually conducted during regular working hours. Medical staff have raised concerns about discrepancies between the volume of work in regular versus additional programs, potential misuse of public funds, and possible misclassification of test results. The article explores why fewer personnel might handle significantly more tests in the afternoon, what the data from Medis reveals about patient orders and documentation, and whether some tests were formally recorded differently from their actual execution. It also examines the connection between the additional program and higher payments for completed exams, as well as the clinic’s response to these findings and potential consequences.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic problem involving potential misuse of public funds and institutional inefficiencies, which aligns with left-leaning concerns about accountability and transparency in public services. While the focus is on administrative practices rather than overt political