Uncensored.si - Russian link of the MP Resni.ce: who helps Mijica with construction deals

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 857 days ago

The head of the Slovenian parliamentary group Resni.ca, Zoran Stevanović, has stated that member Boris Mijič no longer has the moral right to sit in parliament due to his actions, which have caused significant damage to the party. While legal procedures would require by-elections if Mijič were removed, which could cost the party a mandate, Stevanović says they will take all necessary political steps to ensure Mijič does not represent the party by October. He admitted he was shocked to learn of Mijič's misconduct, including financial issues, misleading information, and mistreatment of employees, which occurred without his knowledge. Stevanović emphasized that the party's mandate comes from its supporters, not from Mijič personally, and expects him to settle his obligations to workers and accept responsibility for his actions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the statements of Zoran Stevanović, who criticizes Boris Mijič for his actions but acknowledges the legal constraints preventing immediate removal. The tone remains focused on the internal party dynamics and the need for accountability, without overtly favoring one side over the

Why factuality (94): The article accurately reports statements from Zoran Stevanović regarding Boris Mijič’s actions and the consequences for Resni.ca. It includes direct quotes and aligns closely with the cross-source consensus on the situation involving Mijič’s alleged misconduct and the party’s response.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone by presenting Stevanović’s perspective without overtly favoring any political side. However, some phrases like 'prestopil vse meje' may carry implicit judgment, slightly reducing neutrality.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 828 days ago

Zoran Stevanović, predsednik stranke Resni.ca in predsednik parlamenta, je izrazil svoj šok zaradi dejanj poslancega Boris Mijiča, ki je prenesel svoje insolventno podjetje Progros na Roka Snežiča, kar je povzročilo večje finansijsne težave za delavce. Stevanović je poudaril, da Mijič prestopi meje in da ne sme biti v parlamentu, vendar stranka ne more takoj izbrisati njegovega mandata, ker bi tako izgubila mandat več tisoč volivcev. Mijič je tudi zavajal glede svoje izobrazbe in finančnega položaja. Predsednik vlade Janez Janša je oglasil svojo oceno, da gre za napačne stvari, vendar jih oceni kot manj pomembne v primerjavi z drugimi aktualnostmi.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both Zoran Stevanović and Janez Janša regarding Boris Mijič's actions, providing their perspectives without overtly favoring one side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the reported facts and quotes rather than taking a clear ideological stance.

Why factuality (92): This article provides a detailed account of Stevanović’s comments on Mijič’s actions and the legal implications for Resni.ca. The information matches the cross-source consensus and includes specific details such as the timeline for potential changes in October.

Why objectivity (82): While the article presents facts objectively, it occasionally uses emotionally charged language such as 'mejo dokončno prestopil,' which can imply strong judgment rather than purely factual reporting.

VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 704 days ago

The article reports that Boris Mijič's wife holds a stake in a construction company, 'Gradbene rešitve,' whose owners include Russians. The company was established after Progros, a former enterprise led by Mijič, collapsed financially. According to the report, Mijič allegedly knew about Progros' financial troubles before its collapse, leaving workers, the state, and other creditors unpaid. The article suggests potential connections between Mijič's family and Russian business figures, noting that the company's directors include Mijič's father and his wife. It also highlights the political alignment of Mijič's party, which is described as pro-Russian, and mentions their frequent meetings near Mijič's home.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the connection between Mijič's family and Russian business interests through a lens that implies political influence and pro-Russian alignment. It emphasizes the political affiliations of Mijič's party and suggests possible collusion or hidden ties, using terms like 'zagovornica',

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Suzana Mijič has a 25% stake in Gradbene Rešitve, which was established after Progros' financial troubles. It also mentions the Russian connections through Saida Saitgaleeva and Olga Shneiderman, aligning with the primary source. However, it lacks specific details

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'propadlo' (collapsed) and implies wrongdoing by suggesting Mijič knew his company would fail. The mention of 'ruski partnerji' (Russian partners) could be seen as biased framing without providing balanced context.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 55

The article investigates the business activities of Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni.ca political party, after his construction company Progros faced financial difficulties. It reveals that members of Mijič's family transferred their operations to another company called Gradbene Rešitve, which has Russian business connections. The new owners of Gradbene Rešitve include Aljaž Ferjančič, a Slovenian businessman with long-term ties to Russia, and two Russian citizens, Saida Saitgaleeva and Olga Shneiderman. Suzana Mijič, Mijič's wife, became a shareholder in Gradbene Rešitve and registered her own company for construction work around the same time. The article suggests that Mijič has been using his wife's company to continue working on projects, including a recent railway station renovation project in Ljubljana, without proper authorization from the National Assembly.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as potentially unethical or corrupt, highlighting the connection between Mijič's family and Russian business interests, while also noting the political stance of the Resni.ca party, which is described as having pro-Russian views. The tone implies criticism of Mijič's

Why factuality (75): The article reports on business dealings involving Boris Mijič and his family's connection to a new company, Gradbene rešitve, which took over some of Progros' contracts. It mentions specific individuals like Rok Snežič and links them to Russian partners. While the information appears to be based on

Why objectivity (55): The tone of the article leans towards suggesting potential impropriety or hidden interests, particularly through phrases like 'povezani z omrežjem ruskih poslovnežev' and 'proruskih stališč'. It frames the actions of Mijič and his family as suspicious without providing sufficient counterpoints or al

DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressive7 hr. ago

The article discusses an incident involving Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian political party Resni.ca, who was accused of falsely claiming to hold a degree in civil engineering. The claim was challenged by the portal Necenzurirano, which stated that the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy does not have records of Mijič’s diploma. The article notes that while the party claims such information is not required for parliamentary duties, there is speculation that Mijič might be pressured to resign his mandate. It further suggests that this situation could influence electoral dynamics, particularly in the eighth electoral district where the right-wing SDS has strong support. The article also references past instances where similar claims were dismissed as administrative errors, highlighting potential inconsistencies in how such issues are handled.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as part of broader strategic maneuvering within the political landscape, suggesting that the left-leaning 'Tranzicijska Levica' is using Mijič's potential resignation as a tactical move to shift power dynamics. The emphasis on the implications for electoral outcomes and抨