Three Slovenian legal experts warn against the proposed Specialized Criminal Courts Act (StKOK), arguing that it does not merely reform the judicial system but undermines fundamental principles of criminal procedure. In a public letter to the government, parliamentarians, and the academic community, they caution against excessive repression, reduced procedural safeguards, and an imbalance between state power and the accused. The law, which aims to create specialized organs for handling corruption and organized crime cases, has sparked intense debate among legal professionals since the government approved the bill on July 16. The authors argue that the proposal threatens democratic standards by shifting the balance of power toward the prosecution and steering the process toward an inquisitorial model. They emphasize that criminal proceedings should ensure fairness and protect human rights, not just punish offenders. Statistical data provided in the letter challenges claims that Slovenia’s criminal justice system needs more punitive powers, noting that over 90% of filed charges result in convictions. They also highlight Slovenia’s high number of judges per capita, suggesting the司法系统
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as a threat to democratic principles and civil liberties, emphasizing concerns about prosecutorial overreach and erosion of due process. The language used suggests a left-leaning perspective by highlighting the risks of an 'inquisitorial' approach and questioning,





