ON
← Back to feed
Fires devour millions, and uninsured property
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Fires devour millions, and uninsured property

In Croatia, less than 25 percent of residential properties are insured, leaving many homeowners vulnerable to financial losses from natural disasters like wildfires. Recent fires in Omiš and surrounding areas destroyed hundreds of homes, businesses, and vehicles, with compensation limited to five percent of confirmed damages by the state, unless exceptional circumstances allow higher payouts. In contrast, some regions like Zadar are investigating intentional arson cases, allowing victims to seek civil redress against those proven responsible, though enforcement challenges remain if offenders lack assets. The fire season this year has been significantly more severe than last year, with over 5,500 wildfires recorded through mid-August, including 3,897 affecting vegetation and burning nearly 9,646 hectares, 75 percent more land than in the same period last year. These trends highlight the growing risks of climate change and the urgent need for improved insurance coverage.

In Croatia, wildfires have devastated hundreds of homes and properties over the past week, with damages estimated in the millions of euros. The affected areas include Omis and its surrounding countryside, where more than 100 houses, 30 auxiliary buildings, six hospitality facilities, and over 200 vehicles, motorcycles, and boats were either completely or partially destroyed. Farmers have also suffered significant losses. While authorities have declared a natural disaster, victims will still face uncertainty regarding compensation, as state aid typically covers only up to five percent of confirmed damage, with larger sums requiring special government decisions. The situation has sparked concerns among residents who lack insurance coverage. In some cases, individuals whose property was damaged can seek compensation from those found responsible for intentionally setting fires, though legal proceedings remain complex. Victims can file property claims during ongoing investigations or trials, providing evidence such as photographs, invoices, appraisals, and proof of ownership. Courts may award full or partial compensation, while remaining amounts could be directed toward civil litigation. If multiple parties are implicated, they may share responsibility collectively. However, recovering funds remains challenging if the accused lacks sufficient assets. For insured homeowners, the process begins with reporting damage promptly, within three days of becoming aware of the incident, to their insurer. They must document the extent of the damage through photographs, inventory lists, and retain receipts. Emergency repairs to prevent further harm are allowed without waiting for an appraiser, but prior documentation is essential. Despite these steps, many remain vulnerable due to insufficient insurance coverage. Croatian fire statistics reveal a sharp increase in incidents this year compared to last. As of August 10, 5,575 open fires have been recorded, representing nearly 13 percent more than the previous year. Of these, 3,897 involved vegetation, with 9,646 hectares burned, an increase of 75 percent compared to 5,510 hectares in the same period last year. Aircraft interventions rose to 104 fires, up from 58 in June. Firefighters attribute this surge to prolonged droughts, high temperatures, strong winds, and dry thunderstorms. Insurance costs for fire and elemental damage have also risen sharply. Premiums increased from 146.1 million euros in 2024 to 160.9 million euros in 2025, a 114 percent rise since 2015, when they stood at 75.2 million euros. Similarly, claims payouts have surged from 29.2 million euros to 69.7 million euros, marking a 139 percent increase. These figures reflect growing risks, yet coverage remains limited. Only about 25 percent of residential properties in Croatia are insured, and even fewer policies cover all types of natural disasters or total property loss. Underinsurance poses another challenge, as insurers may reduce payouts proportionally if the insured value falls below actual worth. Older policies, in particular, may require updating to ensure adequate protection. While the financial burden on households continues to grow, the broader implications extend beyond individual losses. The rising frequency and intensity of wildfires underscore the urgent need for improved risk management strategies, including better insurance practices and climate adaptation measures. As the country faces increasingly severe weather patterns, the balance between economic stability and environmental resilience becomes ever more critical.

1 reports

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentCenterFactual 78Objective 65yesterday
Fires devour millions, and uninsured property

In Croatia, less than 25 percent of residential properties are insured, leaving many homeowners vulnerable to financial losses from natural disasters like wildfires. Recent fires in Omiš and surrounding areas destroyed hundreds of homes, businesses, and vehicles, with compensation limited to five percent of confirmed damages by the state, unless exceptional circumstances allow higher payouts. In contrast, some regions like Zadar are investigating intentional arson cases, allowing victims to seek civil redress against those proven responsible, though enforcement challenges remain if offenders lack assets. The fire season this year has been significantly more severe than last year, with over 5,500 wildfires recorded through mid-August, including 3,897 affecting vegetation and burning nearly 9,646 hectares, 75 percent more land than in the same period last year. These trends highlight the growing risks of climate change and the urgent need for improved insurance coverage.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on property insurance rates, wildfire damage, and compensation mechanisms without overtly favoring any political stance. It discusses both the limitations of state aid and potential legal remedies for uninsured victims, maintaining neutrality in tone and framing.

Why factuality (78): The article reports on recent wildfires in Omiš and the impact on property, citing the percentage of insured homes in Croatia and the limitations of insurance coverage. It references the state aid process and mentions the legal actions available to victims. While these details align with general kno

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards emphasizing the severity of the situation and the challenges faced by uninsured residents. Phrases like 'problem je i podosiguranje' and 'državna pomoć u pravilu pokriva najviše pet posto potvrđene štete' suggest a critical view of current systems, though this is comm

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories