Europe on fire: fires raise insurance premiums and empty state budgets
The article discusses the increasing frequency and cost of wildfires across southern Europe, highlighting their economic and financial impacts. It notes that heatwaves and fires have affected countries like France, Spain, Greece, and others, leading to displacement of thousands of people and damage to natural habitats. Wildfires have become more common and expensive, challenging Europe’s ability to manage climate change effects. The European Central Bank and the European Insurance and Pensions Authority propose establishing a public-private insurance scheme at the EU level to address rising costs. Experts warn that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent, increasing direct costs for households, businesses, and governments. Data from the European Environment Agency indicates that over 75% of damages from natural disasters in Europe remain uninsured, placing a growing burden on individuals and public budgets. In France, wildfires caused significant disruptions, including lost workdays and business closures, with estimated recovery costs reaching up to €1 billion.
A major earthquake near Slovenia has sparked urgent discussions about mandatory insurance for buildings, with officials warning of potential economic devastation. According to reports from the Agency for Insurance Supervision (AZN), a recurrence of the 1895 Ljubljana earthquake, rated at magnitude six on the Richter scale, could result in damage to between 42,000 and 102,000 buildings, with direct losses estimated at between €2.5 billion and €16.6 billion. The median cost of property damage alone would reach approximately €7.2 billion, representing around 15 percent of Slovenia’s GDP in 2019. These figures exclude indirect costs such as temporary housing arrangements, population displacement, infrastructure disruption, and lost productivity due to workforce absence. Currently, less than 75 percent of households in Slovenia are insured against natural disasters, while coverage for flood risks stands at around 60 percent. A working group was established two years ago to explore measures aimed at reducing the gap in insurance coverage for natural disaster risks. Comprising representatives from insurance companies and ministries of finance and natural resources, the group studied successful models from other countries. They concluded that the fastest way to reduce this gap is the introduction of mandatory insurance for multi-unit buildings, which should be accompanied by subsidized premiums for vulnerable groups. Other options include establishing a national disaster fund or creating a state-run insurance company specialized in natural disaster coverage, though these require more time to implement. The implementation of such measures will take several decades, according to AZN. Therefore, individuals are urged to reduce their financial exposure to seismic risk today, primarily through the purchase of appropriate insurance. According to Triglav Insurance, only about one-third of residential buildings in Slovenia are earthquake-insured, while roughly a quarter of commercial and industrial structures are covered. “Owners of multi-family buildings often rely on the insurance policy of the building manager,” says Triglav Insurance. In Slovenia, there are between 20,000 and 25,000 multi-unit buildings, of which approximately 40 percent remain uninsured, and over 80 percent lack earthquake coverage. The company emphasizes that awareness of earthquake danger and the proportion of insurance coverage tend to rise after strong earthquakes nearby, such as the 2020 earthquake in Croatia, but decline relatively quickly. Thus, they encourage policyholders to consider insurance based not only on past experiences but also on actual exposure of their property to specific risks. Despite some steps taken toward greater earthquake safety, Slovenia remains unprepared for a major quake. AZN noted that certain actions were undertaken, including the adoption in late 2023 of a resolution titled “Accelerate Earthquake Safety” aiming to improve earthquake resilience until 2050. This includes measures for effective management of earthquake risk, such as inspecting existing buildings and documenting their seismic resistance, which will serve as a basis for prioritized design and reinforcement of the most vulnerable structures, or, where appropriate, their replacement with new constructions. The resolution also proposes integrating energy and seismic renovations, a practice that has historically been absent. However, progress in the field of earthquake safety has been minimal since the resolution was passed. The plan is still under preparation, and its implementation has yet to begin. At a scientific meeting titled “50 Years After the First Earthquake in Posocje, Accelerate the Next One” held in May, representatives from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment revealed that the entire action plan has barely begun, and much work remains to be done.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses earthquake risk in Slovenia, highlighting the potential economic impact of a major quake similar to the 1895 Ljubljana earthquake. According to the Agency for Insurance Supervision (AZN), such an event could damage between 42,000 and 102,000 buildings, causing economic losses ranging from €250 million to €1.66 billion, with direct property damage estimated at €720 million. This would represent 15% of Slovenia’s 2019 GDP. The article notes that currently, only around 25% of residential buildings are insured against earthquakes, while flood insurance covers 75% of households. It highlights the need for mandatory earthquake insurance for multi-unit buildings, supported by subsidies for vulnerable groups, and mentions alternative solutions like establishing a natural disaster fund or a state-run insurance company. However, these measures would take decades to implement, prompting calls for individuals to reduce their financial exposure through insurance now.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and expert assessments from the Agency for Insurance Supervision (AZN) and Zavarovalnica Triglav without overtly promoting any particular political agenda. While it emphasizes the importance of insurance and government action, it does not frame the issue in a left-或
Why factuality (75): The article cites data from the Agency for Insurance Supervision (AZN) regarding potential economic impacts of an earthquake in Ljubljana, including estimated damage ranges and GDP impact. These figures align with typical disaster risk assessments. The article also mentions a working group formed tw
Why objectivity (65): The article presents information in a somewhat informative tone but includes some emotionally charged language such as 'velike motnje' (great disruptions) and 'življenje po Sloveniji bi bilo za več mesecev oteženo' (life in Slovenia would be made more difficult for several months). It also emphasize
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 20Objective 202 days ago
The article discusses the increasing frequency and cost of wildfires across southern Europe, highlighting their economic and financial impacts. It notes that heatwaves and fires have affected countries like France, Spain, Greece, and others, leading to displacement of thousands of people and damage to natural habitats. Wildfires have become more common and expensive, challenging Europe’s ability to manage climate change effects. The European Central Bank and the European Insurance and Pensions Authority propose establishing a public-private insurance scheme at the EU level to address rising costs. Experts warn that extreme weather events are becoming more frequent, increasing direct costs for households, businesses, and governments. Data from the European Environment Agency indicates that over 75% of damages from natural disasters in Europe remain uninsured, placing a growing burden on individuals and public budgets. In France, wildfires caused significant disruptions, including lost workdays and business closures, with estimated recovery costs reaching up to €1 billion.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the issue, citing data from multiple sources such as the European Environment Agency and expert opinions from institutions like the European Central Bank and Swiss Re. While it highlights concerns about rising insurance costs and government financial risks
Why factuality (20): This article discusses tourism in Trieste but does not mention Croatia or the tourism challenges outlined in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (20): The article lacks neutrality by focusing on the benefits of tourism without addressing potential drawbacks or providing a balanced view of the situation.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.