N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908/10/2026A magnitude 2.5 earthquake was felt in neighboring Bosnia and Herzegovina during the night into Monday, according to reports from citizens in areas such as Bijeljina, Travnik, and Dubrovnik. The epicenter was recorded at a depth of 12 kilometers, located 66 kilometers southeast of Mostar and 15 kilometers north of Bijeljina. Residents described the tremors on the EMSC website, with some comparing the sensation to a tractor passing by their homes, while others noted the shaking was brief but noticeable in Bijeljina and Travnik. One user mentioned that the quake woke them up in Dubrovnik, though it was short-lived.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a natural event without overt ideological framing. It includes citizen accounts and data from EMSC, maintaining neutrality in tone and focus. There is no indication of partisan emphasis or loaded language.
Why factuality (95): This article accurately reflects the primary source document, providing precise details about the earthquake’s magnitude, time, location, and depth. It also includes quotes from EMSC users that match those in the primary source. No significant deviations or added information are present.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both scientific data and public reactions without taking sides or injecting personal opinion. It balances factual reporting with community feedback.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 708/9/2026On Sunday at 18:31, a minor earthquake of magnitude 1.6 on the Richter scale struck the area around Sisak. The epicenter was located 26 kilometers deep, 41 kilometers southeast of Zagreb and 15 kilometers west of Sisk. According to the lack of comments on the EMSC website, fortunately, the earthquake did not alarm citizens. The article mentions that the quake was relatively weak and did not cause significant concern among the population.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural event (earthquake) with no political implications or controversy. It provides factual information about the earthquake's magnitude, location, and impact, without any apparent bias or framing that suggests a political stance.
Why factuality (60): The article discusses an unrelated earthquake of magnitude 1,6 near Siska, which is not mentioned in the primary source. It also makes a judgment about the lack of comments on EMSC, implying that the earthquake did not alarm residents, which introduces subjective interpretation rather than factual r
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards a more casual and somewhat dismissive attitude toward the earthquake, suggesting it was not alarming. This introduces a slight bias compared to the more neutral tone of the other articles.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 45Objective 308/15/2026 I'd shake three earthquakes, one comment make everyone laugh: 'I ask my wife if she moved'During the night, three earthquakes were recorded in neighboring Bosnia and Herzegovina, with epicenters near Sarajevo. According to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), the first earthquake had a magnitude of 3.6 on the Richter scale and occurred near Foča, approximately 32 kilometers from Sarajevo. About fifteen minutes later, another tremor struck near Gorazde, around 30 kilometers from Sarajevo, with a magnitude of 3.1. The third earthquake occurred around 3 AM near Šokci, also about 30 kilometers from Sarajevo, with a magnitude of 3.3. Most comments on the EMSC website came from Sarajevo, where all three tremors were felt. Many residents reported feeling the quakes, with some expressing concern about their frequency. One humorous comment read, 'I asked my wife if she moved, she said no. Then I realized it was an earthquake.'
Bias read (Center): The article reports on natural disasters (earthquakes) and includes public reactions, which are not inherently politically charged. There is no indication of bias in the framing, sourcing, or emphasis. The content is factual and neutral.
Why factuality (45): The article reports three earthquakes in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) with magnitudes 3.6, 3.1, and 3.3, but the primary source from EMSC only mentions one earthquake of magnitude 2.5. The article fabricates additional events not present in the original data. It also incorrectly places epicenters ne
Why objectivity (30): The tone is highly subjective and anecdotal, using phrases like 'dosta više' and 'drmaaa' which convey strong emotion. The article frames the situation as alarming and disturbing, with comments expressing concern and fear, which shows a clear bias towards dramatizing the event.
Croatia
