ON
← Back to feed
He could have been saved, the expert opinion on the 14-year-old who died of cancer after treatments according to the Hamer method
Italy🏛️ PoliticsProgressive18 hr. ago

He could have been saved, the expert opinion on the 14-year-old who died of cancer after treatments according to the Hamer method

A 14-year-old boy from Vicenza died in January 2024 from cancer after his parents chose alternative 'pseudoscience' treatments over conventional medicine. The parents had followed the method developed by Ryke Geerd Hamer, which falsely claims that tumors result from psychological conflicts. A forensic report commissioned by the Vicenza Assize Court concluded that the parents could be held responsible for the teenager’s death through voluntary homicide with eventual intent. The report states that the drugs used under Hamer’s method, including Artemisia, may have been neurotoxic and lacked scientific evidence of efficacy against cancer. The case highlights the dangers of rejecting established medical treatment in favor of unproven alternatives. The court is expected to hold a hearing on September 16 to discuss the matter further.

1 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentProgressive18 hr. ago
He could have been saved, the expert opinion on the 14-year-old who died of cancer after treatments according to the Hamer method

A 14-year-old boy from Vicenza died in January 2024 from cancer after his parents chose alternative 'pseudoscience' treatments over conventional medicine. The parents had followed the method developed by Ryke Geerd Hamer, which falsely claims that tumors result from psychological conflicts. A forensic report commissioned by the Vicenza Assize Court concluded that the parents could be held responsible for the teenager’s death through voluntary homicide with eventual intent. The report states that the drugs used under Hamer’s method, including Artemisia, may have been neurotoxic and lacked scientific evidence of efficacy against cancer. The case highlights the dangers of rejecting established medical treatment in favor of unproven alternatives. The court is expected to hold a hearing on September 16 to discuss the matter further.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the parents' choice of alternative medicine as a dangerous rejection of science and conventional care, implying a broader critique of anti-vaccine or anti-science movements. It emphasizes the failure of the parents to seek proper medical treatment, suggesting a societal value on科学

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories