One of the Tromostov balls found at the bottom of Ljubljana during a diving exerciseDuring a routine diving exercise in the Ljubljana River on August 7, 2026, divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department discovered one of two stone balls that had disappeared from the railing of Tromostovje bridge within less than a month. The ball, along with its base, was safely retrieved from the riverbed and will be cleaned and restored before being returned to its original location on the bridge's railing. The Municipal Office of Ljubljana (MOL) organized the exercise in collaboration with the Department for Economic Activities and Traffic, and the exercise was described as a successful example of interdepartmental cooperation aimed at protecting cultural heritage. While vandalism was initially suspected after the first ball went missing, authorities have also considered the possibility that the balls could have fallen into the river due to their age. Tromostovje, built in 1842, is a central landmark in Ljubljana and was inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List in 2021 as part of selected works by architect Jože Plečnik.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the discovery of a historical artifact, focusing on the collaborative efforts between municipal departments and the process of restoring the object. There is no overt ideological framing, and the narrative remains neutral regarding potential causes for the球
Why factuality (98): This article provides precise details about the discovery of one of the missing stones from Tromostovja, including the date of the dive (July 7th) and the involvement of MOL staff. It also mentions the possibility that the stones may have fallen due to age rather than vandalism, which adds nuance. A
Why objectivity (96): The tone remains objective throughout, presenting the events without bias. While it quotes MOL officials, it does not editorialize or take a stance on the cause of the disappearance, maintaining a balanced perspective.
The mystery of the missing Tromostov bullet solved: it was found at the bottom of Ljubljana (PHOTO)Two stone balls that had mysteriously disappeared from the railing of Plečnik's Tromostovje in recent weeks were partially located during a routine exercise by fire department divers in Ljubljana. One of the missing stones was found at the bottom of the Ljubljanica River along with its base and safely retrieved. The disappearance of the two stones sparked concern, prompting the Municipality of Ljubljana's Economic Activities and Transport Department to request a dive operation on the riverbed. The successful retrieval highlights collaboration between municipal services and fire department divers, emphasizing efforts to protect cultural heritage. While one stone has been recovered, the other remains missing.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a local administrative action regarding the recovery of historical artifacts without overt ideological framing. It focuses on municipal operations and cooperation between departments rather than partisan politics. The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without leaning left
Why factuality (97): The article gives a clear account of the discovery of one of the missing stones from Tromostovja, mentioning both the timing of the disappearances and the collaborative efforts between the MOL and the divers. It also highlights the cultural importance of Tromostovja, which is consistent with the oth
Why objectivity (97): The article is written in a neutral tone, providing factual updates without injecting personal opinion or bias. It acknowledges that one stone is still missing but does not speculate beyond what is known, keeping the focus on the verified events.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 958/11/2026Divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department discovered one of two missing stone balls from the Tromostovje bridge during a dive exercise in the Ljubljana River. The two stone balls had disappeared from the bridge's railing within a month, leading the City of Ljubljana to request that divers conduct regular inspections at the location. The recovered ball will be cleaned, restored, and returned to its original position on the bridge. The Tromostovje bridge, originally built in 1842, was recently fully restored and is part of Josip Plečnik's selected works in Ljubljana, inscribed on UNESCO's World Heritage List since 2021.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on cultural heritage and infrastructure restoration, with no mention of political figures, parties, policies, or contentious issues. It provides factual information about the discovery and restoration efforts without any apparent ideological framing or bias.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that divers found one of the missing stones from Tromostovja's railing, citing the Mestna občina Ljubljana (MOL) as confirmation. It also mentions that two stones had disappeared within a month and that the MOL requested divers to conduct inspections. The details align
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It provides straightforward facts about the discovery, the response by local authorities, and the planned restoration process.
One of the missing stone balls found in LjubljanaIn Ljubljana, divers from the Fire Brigade discovered one of two missing stone balls from the Tromostovje bridge during a diving exercise in the Ljubljanica River. The two stone balls had disappeared from the bridge's railing within a month, leading the City of Ljubljana to request regular inspections by the fire divers. One ball was recovered safely and will be cleaned, restored, and returned to its original position on the bridge. Tromostovje, part of Jože Plečnik's selected works in Ljubljana, was inscribed on UNESCO's World Heritage List in 2021. The central stone bridge, built in 1842, replaced a wooden medieval bridge and was expanded by Plečnik between 1929 and 1932.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on cultural heritage and infrastructure maintenance, with no mention of political figures, parties, policies, or contentious issues. It provides factual information about the recovery of historical elements from a UNESCO-listed site, without any apparent ideological framing or sl
Why factuality (94): The article accurately describes the recovery of one of the missing stones from Tromostovja and includes relevant background information about the historical significance of the structure. However, it lacks specific dates compared to some other articles, slightly reducing its precision. Still, it al
Why objectivity (94): The article maintains an even-handed approach, focusing on the factual aspects of the discovery and the subsequent actions taken by the MOL. There is no overt bias or emotional language used in the reporting.
They found another stone ball from the Tromostov fence.In the past month, two stone spheres that had disappeared from the fence of Tromostovje in Ljubljana were recovered by divers. Initially, residents on Molu speculated that the disappearance was due to vandalism. Both spheres were taken to the Conservation and Restoration Center ŠČIT, a specialized department of the Museum and Galleries of the City of Ljubljana, where they will be cleaned and restored, according to their Instagram post. The second sphere was discovered during a diving exercise last Friday. Tromostovje, part of the selected works of Jože Plečnik in Ljubljana, has been inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List since 2021. The central stone bridge of Tromostovje, built in 1842, stands at the site of a former wooden, strategically important medieval bridge connecting the northwestern Europe with the Balkans or southeastern Europe. Between 1929 and 1932, Plečnik added two more bridges for pedestrians. The entire Tromostovje was recently fully renovated over three decades ago.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the recovery of historical artifacts from a culturally significant site, focusing on factual information about the location, history, and restoration efforts. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on political agendas. The narrative remains neutral, presenting the
Why factuality (92): This source provides detailed information on the recovery process, including the date of the dive, the involvement of MOL, and the restoration efforts. It also references the police investigation into vandalism, matching other accounts closely.
Why objectivity (88): The article presents the events objectively, citing MOL and using formal language. While it raises the question of vandalism versus wear and tear, it does not take sides.
Divers in Ljubljana have found another stone ball that recently disappeared from the Tromostovo fence.In Ljubljana, divers from the Fire Department have discovered another stone sphere that had recently disappeared from the Tromostrov fence. The second sphere was found through thorough and systematic examination of the riverbed, according to the City Municipality of Ljubljana. Two stone spheres had gone missing from the Tromostrov fence within a month, and the city initially suspected vandalism. Both spheres were taken to the Conservation and Restoration Center ŠČIT, a specialized department of the Museum and Galleries of the city, where they will be cleaned and restored. The first sphere was discovered last Friday during a diving exercise.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the discovery of lost stone spheres in Ljubljana, focusing on the actions of local authorities and the restoration process. There is no overt political framing or ideological slant in the narrative. The emphasis is on factual reporting regarding municipal efforts and cultural/
Why factuality (90): This article confirms the finding of the second stone sphere through systematic underwater search, mentions the restoration center, and attributes the loss to vandalism. It matches other sources on key facts including timing and location.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting information based on official statements and social media updates. There is no overt bias or emotional language.
At the bottom of Ljubljana they found another bullet that had disappeared from TromostovPotapljači Gasilske brigade Ljubljana so po temeljitem in sistematičnem preiskovanju dna reke Ljubljanice našli drugo kamnito kroglo, ki je izginila s ograje Tromostovja. Oba krogla sta v roku meseca dni izginila in združena sta bila v Konservatorsko-restavratorsko središče ŠČIT za očistitev in restavracijo. Preiskava je bila del redne potapljaške vaje, v kateri so sodelovali tudi sodelavci Oddelka za zaščito in reševanje Mestne občine Ljubljana. Mestna občina je ocenila, da je ta vaja pokazala uspešno sodelovanje mestnih služb in prispevala k varovanju kulturne dediščine. Na MOL-u so ob izginotju prve krogle predpostavili, da je šlo za vandalizem, vendar so tudi možnost dotrajanosti mosta razvzeli, ker je od njegove celovite obnove minilo več kot tri desetletja.
Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje arheološki proces in sodelovanje mestnih služb, brez političke vsebine ali vpliva. Čeprav gre za kulturno dediščino, ki ima politično vlogo, artikel ne izraža nobene stranske pozicije, ampak ponuja objektivno poročilo o dogajanju in sodelovanju.
Why factuality (89): The article confirms the recovery of the second stone sphere, mentions the restoration process, and attributes the loss to vandalism. It aligns with other sources on key points such as timing and location.
Why objectivity (86): The tone is neutral, though it briefly discusses the historical importance of Tromostovje, which adds context without introducing bias.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 858/12/2026In the past month, two stone spheres that had disappeared from the Tromostovje fence in Ljubljana were found by divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department. The Municipal Office of Ljubljana (MOL) initially suspected vandalism but confirmed both spheres were recovered through meticulous underwater searches. Both objects have been sent to the Conservation and Restoration Center ŠČIT, a specialized unit under the Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana, where they will be cleaned and restored. The first sphere was discovered during a diving exercise last Friday. Tromostovje, part of the selected works of Jože Plečnik in Ljubljana, has been inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List since 2021. The central stone bridge of Tromostovje, built in 1842, stands at the site of a former wooden medieval bridge that connected the northwestern Europe with the Balkans and southeastern Europe. Between 1929 and 1932, Plečnik added two pedestrian bridges to the main structure.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the recovery of historical artifacts from a cultural heritage site without taking a political stance. It focuses on factual information regarding the location, history, and restoration process of the stone spheres, with no indication of ideological leaning or partisan framing.
Why factuality (88): The article accurately reports the recovery of the second stone sphere, mentions the restoration process, and links the incident to vandalism. It includes details from MOL and Instagram posts, consistent with other sources.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, though it briefly mentions the historical significance of Tromostovje, which adds context without introducing bias.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 838/11/2026Two decorative ball ends from the railing of Ljubljana's Prešeren Bridge, a cultural monument of national significance and part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Prešeren's Ljubljana, have gone missing. The incidents occurred in July and August 2026, with one of the lost balls discovered by divers in the river Ljubljana. Authorities, including the Cultural Heritage Protection Agency, have called for urgent repairs due to the risk of further damage to the exposed surfaces. They emphasize that simply replacing the missing balls would not be sufficient, as comprehensive restoration involving infrastructure systems beneath the bridge is necessary. The bridge was last fully restored over three decades ago in 1991–1992, but recent inspections reveal additional damages indicating the need for systematic renewal.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on the vandalism of a cultural heritage site and the subsequent call for restoration, which involves governmental and cultural authorities. While the issue has political implications due to its connection with national identity and heritage management, the tone remains objective,
Why factuality (88): This article confirms the loss of two stone balls from Tromostovje due to vandalism, supported by the discovery of one by divers. It references the cultural heritage authority’s call for urgent repairs and the need for comprehensive restoration, consistent with other reports. The date and details ma
Why objectivity (83): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on reporting the incident and official responses. While it highlights the vandalism as an intentional act, it does not take sides or express strong opinion, keeping the narrative objective.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 808/13/2026 The riddle of Tromostov is solved: Ljubljanica has also drawn another missing ballIn August 2026, two missing stone spheres from the Plečnik Bridge in Ljubljana were recovered after a systematic search of the riverbed by divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department. The first sphere was found on August 7 during routine maintenance organized by the Municipality of Ljubljana (MOL), while the second was retrieved three days later. Both spheres, along with their bases, were transported to the Conservation and Restoration Center ŠČIT, which operates under the Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana. They will undergo cleaning and restoration before being returned to their original positions on the bridge. The municipality had previously reported the disappearance of both spheres as vandalism and informed the police, who are still investigating the incident.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the recovery of historical artifacts from a public monument, focusing on the actions of municipal authorities and emergency services. There is no overt ideological framing, partisan emphasis, or biased language. The narrative remains neutral, presenting facts about the event,官
Why factuality (85): The article reports that another missing stone sphere was recovered from the riverbed near Tromostovje by divers from the fire department. It aligns with other sources that both spheres were found within a month, taken to a restoration center, and that the loss was attributed to vandalism. The artic
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the recovery process and official statements. However, there is slight emphasis on the resolution of the mystery, which may lean slightly towards a positive narrative.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/11/2026Two stone spheres that had fallen off the Tromostovje bridge in Ljubljana were reported missing. On May 17, divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department, at the request of the City Municipality's Economic Activities and Transport Office (MOL), conducted a search along the riverbed and successfully recovered one of the spheres. The sphere, created by renowned architect Jože Plečnik, was lifted from the riverbed and will be cleaned, restored, and returned to its original location on the bridge. The second sphere remains missing, though authorities suspect vandalism. The municipality has informed the police about both incidents. Cultural heritage experts emphasize that merely replacing the missing sphere is insufficient, as the entire structure requires comprehensive restoration due to aging materials and structural damage. Tromostovje was last fully renovated between 1991 and 1992, but recent inspections reveal additional damages necessitating systematic repairs.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a local municipal issue involving cultural heritage preservation and infrastructure maintenance. While the topic relates to public policy and urban management, there is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on specific political agendas. The focus is on factual updates and,
Why factuality (85): The article reports accurately on the recovery of one of the missing stone balls from Tromostovje by divers during a training exercise organized by the city council. It mentions the collaboration with the fire department and the cultural heritage protection office, aligning with the cross-source con
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without strong emotional language. However, there is some emphasis on the vandalism aspect and the need for restoration, which slightly leans towards highlighting the issue rather than remaining strictly impartial.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 758/10/2026 New case of vandalism: a fish sculpture also disappearedA notable sculpture of a fish at Tivolski Ribnik in Ljubljana has gone missing, with local authorities attributing the incident to vandalism. The sculpture, created by expressionist sculptor France Kralj in 1935, was reported missing by visitors who noticed its absence during their walks. The Municipal Office of Ljubljana (MOL) confirmed the vandalism and stated that the sculpture was not physically damaged, though its base had been broken. They mentioned that police have documented the incident and plan to reinstall the sculpture by the end of autumn, aiming to minimize disruption to wildlife. This follows similar incidents involving stone balls on the Tromostovje fence, where MOL suspects vandalism as well.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on vandalism without overtly criticizing or praising any political group or ideology. It focuses on the administrative response from the municipal office and includes quotes from officials without apparent ideological slant. While the issue of vandalism is a low
Why factuality (85): This article provides more detailed information about the sculpture of the fish at Tivolski ribnik, including its creator, date, and the city council’s response. It accurately reflects the cross-source consensus regarding vandalism as the likely cause and outlines the planned replacement later in th
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the facts clearly, it has a slightly promotional tone, especially in the headline and subheadings. It emphasizes the cultural significance of the lost sculpture but does not present alternative viewpoints or contextualize the issue beyond the city council’s statement.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 808/12/2026 Divers in Ljubljana have found another stone ball from the Tromostovo fenceIn Ljubljana, divers have discovered another stone sphere that had recently disappeared from the Tromostovje fence. The divers from the Ljubljana Fire Department conducted a thorough and systematic search of the riverbed and found the second stone sphere. Previously, two stone spheres had gone missing from the Tromostovje fence within a month, leading the City Municipality of Ljubljana (MOL) to suspect vandalism. Both spheres were taken to the Conservation and Restoration Center ŠČIT, a specialized department of the Museum and Galleries of Ljubljana, where they will be cleaned and restored. The first sphere was discovered during a diving exercise last Friday. Tromostovje, part of the selected works of Jože Plečnik in Ljubljana, has been inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List since 2021. The central stone bridge of Tromostovje, built in 1842, stands at the site of a former wooden, strategically important medieval bridge that connected the northwestern Europe with the Balkans or southeastern Europe. Between 1929 and 1932, Plečnik added two more bridges for pedestrians.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the discovery of lost historical artifacts in a culturally significant area, focusing on factual updates and restoration efforts. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on political agendas. The narrative remains neutral, presenting information based on municipal通报和
Why factuality (75): The article reports on the discovery of a second stone sphere by divers from Ljubljana, corroborating the earlier loss of two spheres from the Tromostovje fence. It mentions the involvement of the City Municipality of Ljubljana (Mol) and the restoration process at ŠČIT. The information aligns with t
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the event neutrally, focusing on the actions of the divers and the municipal response. It avoids emotional language and provides factual updates without apparent bias. The tone remains informative and objective throughout.
Slovenia
