MP Boris Mijič donated the notorious company to the new owner Rok Snežič, whose main business is camel herding (VIDEO)

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8012 days ago

Some former employees of the construction company Progros, owned by MP Boris Mijič, are demanding over 41,000 euros in unpaid wages, regressions, and other entitlements. The workers have not yet received an official payment request, prompting them to hire a detective, according to the website Necenzurirano. The total claims from 13 former employees amount to 41,285 euros, including unpaid salaries, regressions, holiday compensation, and other benefits dating back to spring 2025. Additional amounts include contributions and taxes that the employer was supposed to settle. The actual debt owed by Progros is higher due to these additional costs. The company has no remaining assets to cover debts, and previous creditors have already seized some assets. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) has initiated enforcement proceedings against Progros, which owes over 30,000 euros. Additionally, Progros has outstanding debts to a local restaurant, which was unable to collect payments for meals prepared for its employees. Due to blocked bank accounts, Progros cannot enforce debts through court, despite having obtained enforcement orders. The company owes over 3,600 euros to the餐厅. MP Mǐ

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the personal financial mismanagement of MP Boris Mijič, highlighting his alleged dishonesty regarding education and his failure to repay debts. While the focus is on the company’s financial issues, the emphasis on Mijič’s personal accountability and potential dism

Why factuality (90): This article provides clear factual information about unpaid wages and debts owed by Progros to former employees, supported by sources like Necenzurirano and Večer. It accurately reports the financial status of the company and the actions taken by the workers.

Why objectivity (80): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the facts without overtly taking sides. However, there is a slight leaning towards the workers’ plight, but this is common in reporting on labor issues.

Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 609 days ago

The Slovenian politician Boris Mijič has transferred his 100% ownership of the company Progros to his tax advisor Rok Snežič, according to the news portal 24 ur. The transfer was done through a contract signed at a notary on July 20th, and the company was renamed Klukec d.o.o., with camels breeding as its main activity. Despite this transfer, Mijič remains indebted to his employees for over €10,000 and to the Slovenian Financial Administration for more than €30,000 in unpaid taxes and contributions. Employees reportedly were dismissed without their knowledge through forged signatures, leading to police investigations. Luka Mesec, a prominent critic of Mijič, has repeatedly called for his resignation, and the Left Party has demanded an urgent session of the Chamber of Deputies' Economic, Labor, and Sports Committee due to Mijič’s actions. Snežič claims he initiated the transfer and that Mijič 'freely expropriated' his share in the company. However, Mesec has previously won two lawsuits against Snežič, who lacks funds to pay legal costs, prompting both Mesec and his lawyer to file an enforcement order against Snežič’s company. Snežič now allows Mesec to recover debts by giving him a

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a conflict between a politician (Mijič) and his critics (Mesec), highlighting Mijič's financial mismanagement and potential corruption. It emphasizes the legal battles and calls for accountability, aligning with left-leaning narratives that focus on transparency,劾

Why factuality (90): The article thoroughly documents the transfer of Progros from Mijič to Snežič, including the legal process, the renaming of the company to Klukec, and the potential transfer to Luka Mesec. It also cites direct quotes from Snežič and references the legal implications.

Why objectivity (60): The article uses strong language like 'norčevanje' (mockery) and criticizes Mijič and Snežič harshly, showing a clear bias against them and their actions.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65

The article discusses the financial insolvency and legal issues surrounding Boris Mijič's former company, Progros. It reveals that despite Mijič publicly promising to settle all debts by year-end, he transferred the company assets to Rok Snežič without proper compensation, effectively ending Progros' operations. The company ceased functioning in early 2025, leaving employees unpaid and failing to meet tax obligations, leading to its classification as insolvent under Slovenian law. Although Mijič could have initiated bankruptcy proceedings by September 2025, this has not occurred, raising concerns about his responsibility and potential legal liability. The article highlights ongoing legal actions against Mijič for alleged fraud towards both employees and the public.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Boris Mijič's actions as fraudulent and deceptive, emphasizing his failure to fulfill promises to employees and the public. It portrays him as having manipulated legal structures to avoid accountability, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of corporate and political elites.

Why factuality (85): This article provides detailed information about Mijič's alleged fraud, including dates, names, and specific actions taken by him. It references legal documents and statements from multiple parties, supporting the claim that Mijič transferred the company to Snežič without fulfilling his obligations

Why objectivity (65): While the article presents factual information, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'lagal' and 'prevara', suggesting a biased view towards Mijič. The focus on his alleged deceit may influence the reader's perception.

Zanima.meIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 657 days ago

The article discusses the reactions to the Slovenian company Klukec d.o.o., which was created by transferring Boris Mijič’s company Progros to tax advisor Rok Snežič. The rebranding included adding 'rejo camels' as a registered activity, which Snežič claimed was a political provocation linked to Leftist coordinator Luka Mesec. Responses ranged from criticism, including condemnation from Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Council and party Resnica, to humorous and supportive comments from various individuals and politicians. The article also mentions Tadej Pogačar breaking a record at the Tour de France.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič as politically motivated, linking them to Leftist figures like Luka Mesec. While the article presents both critical and positive responses, the emphasis on the political implications and the support from Left-aligned figures (such as AstaV

Why factuality (85): The article confirms the transfer of Progros to Snežič and the renaming to Klukec d.o.o. It includes quotes from Snežič and Mesec, and references to legal proceedings. The information is consistent with other reports.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat biased, highlighting the political maneuvering and the consequences for Mesec. It uses emotive language to frame the situation as a challenge to Mesec’s credibility.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 658 days ago

The article discusses the financial maneuvering of Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, who transferred ownership of his company Progros to Rok Snežič without paying off debts owed to creditors. The article quotes Katja Kokot, leader of Mijič’s political party, who comments on the move. Kokot states that Mijič has not eliminated the debts but has legally transferred them to the new owner, Snežič. She emphasizes that the debts remain tied to the company and that the new owner, Snežič, has publicly stated he intends to pursue legal action against Mijič for unpaid debts. Kokot supports the legality of the transfer but expresses concern over the potential impact on creditors. The article also mentions that Snežič changed the company name and activities, and Kokot suggests that while some workers have been paid, others still await resolution.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue by quoting Kokot's concerns about the debt situation and her support for the legal transfer. It does not overtly favor one political stance over another, maintaining a balanced approach between the actions of Mijič and the implications for creditors. The

Why factuality (85): The article includes quotes from Goran Lukić and Miha Juhart, detailing the legal and ethical implications of the transfer. It provides specific examples of the financial issues involved and aligns with other sources on the legal framework surrounding the transfer.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is critical of Mijič's actions, particularly highlighting the emotional distress of the workers and the broader societal impact. The language used conveys a sense of outrage and moral judgment.

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 659 days ago

Poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič je podaril svoje podjetje Progros brezplačno poslansku kandidati Lige Slovencev Roki Snežiču, kar je povzročilo novo pozornost na njegovo finančno stanje. Mijič je dolžan več kot 10.000 evrov delavcem in Finančni upravi RS pa več kot 30.000 evrov neplačanih davkov. Snežič je preimenoval podjetje v Klukec, s tem pa izključil konkurencijo v rejah kamel. Snežič je tudi opozoril na Meščevu kandidaturu za ljubljanskega župana, ocenjujejoč, da je to izziv za njega. Kritiki, kot je Mesec, so zahtevali njegovo odstopo in sklic nujne seje odbora DZ za gospodarstvo, delo in šport. Mijič je zatrdil, da bo do konca leta poplačal vse dolgove in se opravičil oškodovanim.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of Progros from Mijič to Snežič as a significant political event, highlighting Mijič's financial mismanagement and legal issues. It emphasizes Snežič's position as a candidate from the Left League and criticizes Mijič's actions, suggesting his continued presence in议会（

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the transfer of Progros, including legal documents and statements from both Mijič and Snežič. It aligns with other sources on the timeline and legal implications of the transfer.

Why objectivity (65): The tone is critical of Mijič's actions, particularly focusing on his failure to fulfill his obligations to workers and the state. The language used suggests a strong disapproval of his decisions.

Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 659 days ago

The article reports that MP Boris Mijič has transferred his share in his company Progros to Rok Snežič without charge. The transfer was formalized through a notarial agreement, and Snežič renamed the company to Klukec d.o.o., changing its main activity to camel breeding. Mijič has been involved in several controversies recently, including financial obligations to employees and the state, and allegations of falsifying his educational background. The article notes that Mijič's former company Progros may face insolvency due to unpaid taxes and lack of financial reports. Additionally, Mijič has been accused of owing money to his photographer and misleading claims about his qualifications. The article also mentions that the chairman of the Resnica party, Zoran Stevanović, has covered some of Mijič’s debts, creating a cycle of debt between them.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around Mijič's alleged mismanagement and corruption, highlighting his financial irresponsibility and potential legal issues. It emphasizes the implications of his actions on public trust and political accountability, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by focusing,

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a transfer of ownership from Boris Mijič to Rok Snežič, citing a contract signed at a notary. It mentions the renaming of the company to Klukec d.o.o. and the change in main activity to camel breeding. While these details align with the cross-source consensus, some elements li

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans towards sensationalism, particularly in the part where Snežič comments on Luka Mesec’s potential takeover. The article uses emotive language and frames the situation as a political provocation, showing bias toward Snežič’s perspective.

LokalecIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 609 days ago

Poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič je podjetje Progros brezplačno prenestel Roki Snežiču, kar je sledilo spremembi imena podjetja v Klukec in spremembi glavne dejavnosti v rejo kamel. Snežič je objasnil, da je to storil, ker ima poslanec Levice Luka Mesec pravnomočno izvršbo na njegovem premoženju, kar bi lahko pomenilo, da Mesec dostopa do njegovega premoženja. Snežič meni, da je ta manever izziv za Mesca, ki kandidiira za ljubljanskega župana, da dokaze svojo sposobnost. Medtem, ko Mijič ostaja dolžan delavcem in državi, je bil Mesec enega najboljših kritikov Mijiča, kar je povzročilo zahteve za njegovo odstopitev. Mijič je zatrdil, da bo do konca leta poplačal svoje dolgove in sodeluje pri spremembah zakonodaje.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of Progros from Mijič to Snežič as a strategic move by Snežič to challenge Luka Mesec, who is portrayed as a critic of Mijič. The narrative emphasizes Mesec’s role as a legitimate critic and highlights Mijič’s financial mismanagement and legal issues, which aligns a左翼

Why factuality (85): The article provides a summary of the transfer of Progros to Snežič and the subsequent changes. It includes quotes from Snežič and references to legal proceedings. The information is consistent with other reports.

Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical of Mesec, suggesting he was misled or played a role in the situation. It frames the events in a way that highlights the conflict between the parties.

Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 609 days ago

A Slovenian politician, Boris Mijič from the Resnica party, has gifted his company Progros to another businessman, Rok Snežič of Maribor, according to reports by portal 24ur. Mijič, who recently attracted media attention due to alleged non-payment to employees, is said to have transferred the company to Snežič without charge. Snežič acknowledges that the company is in financial loss and operates with negative capital. The transfer was formalized at a notary’s office, and the company was renamed Klukec d.o.o., with its main activity defined as 'rejo kamel.' Snežič claims he has not owned any company in Slovenia since selling Poravnava in 2008. He also mentions that Luka Mesec, a candidate for mayor of Ljubljana, has replaced him as director in his company. Mesec criticized the transaction as poor humor, suggesting that if someone were in Mijič’s position, they would feel exploited. Snežič further implies that this could be a challenge for Mesec, who is running for mayor, and that if Mesec fails to resolve the financial issues, voters might waste their votes on him.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a potential challenge for Luka Mesec, a candidate for mayor, implying that his actions could negatively impact voter trust. It highlights Mesec's criticism of the transaction as 'bad humor,' which suggests a left-leaning perspective that views Mesec's actions as a

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the transfer, the change in company name, and the legal background. It references multiple sources and includes details about the new business activity. It maintains consistency with other reports.

Why objectivity (60): While factual, the article leans slightly toward portraying Mesec as being taken advantage of, using phrases like 'norčevanje' which can be seen as emotionally charged.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 60

The article discusses Rok Snežič, who has filed numerous lawsuits against the media outlet Necenzurirano, including 60 private criminal and compensation claims. Despite losing all cases, Snežič lacks funds to pay court costs and owes €25,000 to the outlet. The article highlights his financial situation, noting he owns a villa in Maribor while living modestly. It connects Snežič to Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni party, whose business practices have been scrutinized. Mijič allegedly promised employees payment but failed to deliver, leading to legal issues. The article suggests Snežič is involved in Mijič’s financial affairs, possibly through a network linked to money laundering. The piece criticizes both individuals' actions and their impact on public trust.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective toward Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič, accusing them of financial misconduct, fraud, and failure to fulfill obligations to employees. The tone is strongly condemnatory, highlighting their alleged illegal activities and lack of accountability. The framing uses贬

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the transfer of Progros and quotes Minister Logar and Luka Mesec, providing clear context about the legal implications and public reaction. It cites specific events and official statements, maintaining alignment with other sources.

Why objectivity (60): The language used by Minister Logar is strongly critical, using phrases like 'izjemno slab smisel za humor' which convey a negative judgment. The article frames the situation as a deliberate attempt to evade responsibility, showing a clear stance.

Nova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 80Objective 605 days ago

Rok Snežič, znani poslovni svetovalec in davčni strokovnjak, je izrazil razočaranje glede odločitve Luke Mesa, sokoordinatorja Levice in kandidata za župana Ljubljane, da ne bo prevzel podjetja Klukec d.o.o., ki mu je Snežič namenoma pripravil prek pravnomočne izvršbe. Snežič trdi, da je Mesec javno lažil svojim volivcem, saj je predlagal, da bo prevzel podjetje in pokazal svoje podjetništvo, vendar zdaj prizna, da se je zlagal in ne bo uveljavil izvršbe. Snežič je podjetje Klukec d.o.o. prevzel brezplačno in ga preimenoval, da bi Mesecu omogočil uresničitev svoje napovedi. Mesec pa je potezo označil kot 'slab smisel za humor' in poudaril, da ne bo uveljavil izvršbe na tem podjetju. Snežič meni, da Mesec ni sposoben voditi velikega podjetja in da bo enako ravnal tudi pri svojih obljubah za župana Ljubljane.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a critical perspective towards Luka Mesec, a prominent Left-wing politician and candidate for mayor of Ljubljana, suggesting he is dishonest and cowardly. The framing emphasizes Mesec’s failure to follow through on his public promises, which aligns with a right-leaning critique.

Why factuality (80): The article summarizes various reactions to the formation of Klukec d.o.o., including public responses and political commentary. It includes quotes from Snežič and others, providing context to the situation.

Why objectivity (60): The tone is highly subjective, emphasizing the controversy and public reaction. It uses emotive language to highlight the political nature of the situation, potentially skewing the reader's perception.

DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 80Objective 609 days ago

The article reports on a business transfer between politicians in Slovenia. Former MP Boris Mijič transferred his company, Progros, to another politician, Rok Snežič, for free. Snežič renamed the company to Klukec, focusing on camel breeding, which he claims prevents competition from Mesec, a rival politician. The article highlights ongoing legal issues involving Mijič, including unpaid debts to employees and authorities, as well as allegations of fraudulent actions against workers. It also mentions Mesec's criticism of Mijič and calls for his resignation. The piece frames the situation as a political scandal, suggesting potential implications for public trust in politicians.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around political figures and their financial dealings, emphasizing the controversy surrounding Mijič's actions and Mesec's criticisms. It suggests that Mijič's behavior undermines public trust, aligning more with left-leaning concerns about corruption and ethical mis

Why factuality (80): The article provides an authoritative statement from the head of the Notary Association, explaining the legality of the transfer and the role of the notary. It aligns with other sources and offers a clear explanation of the legal framework, making it highly factual.

Why objectivity (60): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on the legal aspects without taking sides. It maintains a professional and objective approach throughout.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 559 days ago

The article discusses a political controversy involving Slovenian politicians Luka Mesec (from the Left Party) and Boris Mijič (from the Slovenian People's Party), along with businessman Rok Snežič. Mesec criticizes Mijič and Snežič for their actions regarding the transfer of ownership of the Progros company, which was transferred to Snežič for free. Mesec accuses them of lacking sense of humor and engaging in deceit, while also highlighting broader issues of corruption and mismanagement. The situation involves legal disputes, unpaid debts, and allegations of fraud against Mijič. Mesec further connects this to Mijič’s candidacy for mayor of Ljubljana, suggesting that his ability to manage financial affairs will determine his suitability for office.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Mijič and Snežič as unethical and corrupt, emphasizing their alleged deception and misuse of power. It positions Mesec as a moral authority criticizing these behaviors, aligning with left-wing values of accountability and transparency. The tone leans toward holding右

Why factuality (80): This article confirms the transfer of Progros by Mijič to Snežič, mentions the legal proceedings, and includes quotes from both parties. It aligns with other reports but uses emotive language when describing Mesec’s reaction, which may affect neutrality.

Why objectivity (55): The article has a strong negative tone toward Mesec, calling his comments 'izjemno slab smisel za humor,' which suggests a subjective interpretation rather than an objective report.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 559 days ago

Former MP Boris Mijič has transferred ownership of his company Progros to tax advisor Rok Snežič through a free transfer agreement, effectively ending his involvement with the firm. The company was renamed Klukec d.o.o. and its main activity changed to 'rejo kamel,' a term used to describe a legal process where a debtor’s assets are seized by creditors. This move comes after Progros faced significant financial difficulties, including unpaid wages and taxes owed to employees and the state, with debts exceeding €41,000. Snežič explained the change in company name and activity as a strategic decision to avoid competition from MP Luka Mesec, who holds a legal claim against him. Mesec, a member of the Left Party, has a legally enforceable claim against Snežič for several thousand euros, which he claims could allow Mesec to access Snežič’s assets if he becomes mayor of Ljubljana. Snežič also commented on Mesec’s candidacy for mayor, suggesting that his ability to resolve these financial issues would determine whether voters’ votes are wasted.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the transfer of ownership and the financial situation of the company, without overtly favoring either side politically. While there are mentions of political figures and their potential influence, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal and fiscal

Why factuality (80): Consistent with other reports regarding the transfer, legal issues, and Mesec's response. Includes quotes from both sides and details about the company restructuring.

Why objectivity (55): The article presents Mesec's comments in a critical light, using emotive language such as 'slab smisel za humor,' which may influence reader perception.

VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 75Objective 609 days ago

Rok Snežič je izgubil dve tožbi proti Luki Mescu, kar je povzročilo pravnomočno izvršbo na njegovo podjetje Snežič d.o.o. Boris Mijič je svoje podjetje Progros brezplačno podaril Snežiču, kar je bil notarsko overjen. Snežič je podjetje preimenoval v Klukec d.o.o. in registriral novo glavno dejavnost. Mijič je obljubil, da bo podjetje poplačalo dolge do delavcev, vendar je bil njegov novi direktor Admirj Kamerić, ki ima prebivališče v Bosni in Hercegovini. Mesec kritizira Smisel za humor Mijiča in Snežiča ter opozori na stanje delavcev, ki jih Mijič ne plačuje. Mesec meni, da se ne moreme več govoriti o političnih strankah, ampak o vrednotah, kot so prava, resnost in moral.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič in a manner that emphasizes their financial struggles and legal battles, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that often highlight systemic issues and corporate responsibility. The narrative suggests that Mijič’s failure to pay his欠

Why factuality (75): The article provides details from multiple sources including 24ur.com and Necenzurirano, mentioning the notarized transfer of shares, the change in company name, and legal proceedings involving Luka Mesec. It aligns with cross-source consensus but lacks some specific financial figures and does not c

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat biased towards criticizing Luka Mesec's actions, using phrases like 'slab smisel za humor' and suggesting Mesec's motives are questionable. The article frames the situation as a form of mockery rather than a purely business transaction.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 558 days ago

The article discusses the actions of MP Boris Mijić from the party Resnica, who transferred his debt-ridden company Progros to Rok Snežič, a member of the opposition party Levica. Instead of paying back debts to the state and employees, Mijić moved the company under Snežič's ownership, which then changed the company's main activity to camel breeding. This move was intended to evade legal responsibility for unpaid wages and court costs owed to another politician, Luka Mescu. Legal expert Dr. Rajko Pirnat comments that despite selling the company, Mijić cannot avoid liability for debts to workers, and there is likely to be a review of the company's legal entity. He warns that this could constitute a gift violating integrity laws and criticizes the ruling coalition for failing to condemn such behavior publicly.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of politicians as unethical and highlights criticism of the ruling coalition for not condemning these behaviors. The emphasis is on accountability and integrity, aligning with left-leaning values. The legal expert's critique of the ruling coalition suggests a leftward傾

Why factuality (75): This article confirms the transfer of Progros to Snežič and includes details about the legal and financial implications. It aligns with other sources and provides a comprehensive overview of the situation, including quotes from Snežič and legal experts.

Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat biased, focusing on the consequences of Mijič’s actions and implying potential wrongdoing. While the facts are accurate, the narrative leans towards criticism.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 55

The article reveals that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliamentary group Resni.ca, falsely promised employees of his company Progros that he would pay their outstanding wages by the end of 2026. However, prior to this public commitment, Mijič had already taken steps to legally transfer ownership of the company to Rok Snežič, a tax advisor based in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This move effectively absolved Mijič of any financial responsibility toward the company’s debts. The article highlights that Snežič has no assets or bank account, making it nearly impossible for former employees or the state to recover the owed money. Additionally, the new director of Progros, Snežič, is registered at an address without a house number in Bosnia and Herzegovina, further complicating efforts to hold him accountable.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critically examines the actions of Boris Mijič, a politician affiliated with the left-wing party Resni.ca, exposing what it describes as deceptive behavior and legal maneuvering to avoid financial obligations. The tone is investigative and critical of Mijič's conduct, suggesting a left-

Why factuality (70): The article discusses Mijič's actions and connects them to broader political and economic issues, referencing past legal cases and financial records. While it provides context, it also introduces speculative elements about Snežič's motives and potential connections to other political figures, which

Why objectivity (55): The tone is highly critical of both Mijič and Snežič, using terms like 'serijsko vlaga tožbe' and implying a pattern of behavior. This suggests a bias towards portraying both individuals negatively.

DomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 505 days ago

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Boris Mijič, a Slovenian politician who transferred his ownership stake in the company Progros to Rok Snežič without paying off debts. The transfer was formalized on July 20, 2026, under the new company name Klukec, which continues to operate with outstanding obligations. While Mijič claims the financial difficulties were due to unpaid client invoices and liquidity issues, critics argue that the move raises questions about accountability and transparency. Snežič, who has not taken personal responsibility for the debts, maintains that he is not personally liable under limited liability company laws. Additionally, there is mention of a legal dispute between Snežič and former Minister Luka Mesc, where Mesc sought to enforce a judgment against Snežič, potentially leading to asset seizure.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a case of political accountability, highlighting Mijič’s failure to address financial responsibilities while serving in public office. It emphasizes the lack of personal liability for Snežič, suggesting a critique of how such cases are handled within the political

Why factuality (70): This article confirms the transfer of ownership from Mijič to Snežič and includes details about the legal process and the new company name. It aligns with other sources but uses more political language, which affects objectivity. The factual content is mostly accurate and supported by cross-source r

Why objectivity (50): The article has a strong political tone, suggesting that the transfer was politically motivated. This introduces bias and reduces objectivity despite accurate factual reporting.

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 5512 days ago

The article reports on financial difficulties faced by the company Progros, which owes money to former employees, the Slovenian state, and local businesses. Former employees claim they are owed a total of €41,285, including unpaid wages, reimbursements, and other benefits from their employment relationship, some dating back to spring 2025. The company has no remaining assets to settle debts, and its bank account was frozen last week. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) has initiated enforcement proceedings against the company, which owes over €30,000. Additionally, Progros has outstanding debts to a local restaurant, which cannot recover payments due to blocked accounts. The article mentions that Mijič, a member of parliament representing the party Resnica, lied about his education and faces demands to resign. He claims he will pay all debts by year-end and promises cooperation in legislative changes to prevent similar situations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around Mijič’s alleged dishonesty and potential resignation, emphasizing ethical concerns and legal accountability. It highlights the political implications of his actions, particularly regarding transparency and integrity in parliamentary representation. While the报道

Why factuality (65): The article provides details about unpaid wages, debts, and legal actions against Progros, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It mentions specific figures like 41,285 euros and references the Financial Authority’s involvement. However, it lacks direct quotes from official documents and presen

Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat sensational, using phrases like 'dolžan jim je' and focusing on the negative aspects of the situation. The article appears to present the story in a way that emphasizes the problems rather than providing a balanced view.

FinanceIndependent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 809 days ago

The headline reports that Boris Mijič, associated with the company Progros, gifted Roko Snežič something. The article originates from the finance sector in Slovenia. No detailed content is provided beyond the headline.

Bias read (Center): The headline presents a factual statement without overtly positive or negative language. It simply states an action taken by a business associate of a politician, which does not inherently favor any political side. Given the lack of additional context or commentary, the framing remains neutral.

Why factuality (60): The article only provides a headline stating that Mijič transferred Progros to Snežič, offering no additional details or context. While this is factually correct based on other sources, it lacks depth and supporting evidence.

Why objectivity (80): The article is extremely brief and does not include any opinion or framing, making it highly objective despite the lack of detail.