MP Boris Mijič donated the notorious company to the new owner Rok Snežič, whose main business is camel herding (VIDEO)

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 96Objective 656 days ago

The article reports on financial difficulties faced by the company Progros, which owes money to former employees, the Slovenian state, and local businesses. Former employees claim they are owed a total of €41,285, including unpaid wages, reimbursements, and other benefits from their employment relationship, some dating back to spring 2025. The company has no remaining assets to settle debts, and its bank account was frozen last week. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) has initiated enforcement proceedings against the company, which owes over €30,000. Additionally, Progros has outstanding debts to a local restaurant, which cannot recover payments due to blocked accounts. The article mentions that Mijič, a member of parliament representing the party Resnica, lied about his education and faces demands to resign. He claims he will pay all debts by year-end and promises cooperation in legislative changes to prevent similar situations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around Mijič’s alleged dishonesty and potential resignation, emphasizing ethical concerns and legal accountability. It highlights the political implications of his actions, particularly regarding transparency and integrity in parliamentary representation. While the报道

Why factuality (96): The article accurately reports the allegations against Mijič and references the primary source document. It correctly states that Mijič is not listed as a graduate at FGG and that former employees had concerns about his qualifications.

Why objectivity (65): The article has a biased tone, focusing on the ethical implications of Mijič's actions while not providing a balanced view of the situation. It criticizes the lack of consequences for Mijič compared to others.

Primorske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 758 days ago

The article discusses the ongoing scandal involving Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič from the party Resnica, who continues to face scandals despite public pressure. Coalition parties refuse to comment on the matter, and parliamentary speaker Zoran Stevanović is protecting his colleague, planning to propose Mijič’s expulsion from the party after summer holidays but not pressing him to resign as a parliamentarian. If Mijič resigns before October 10th, early elections would be held in his constituency, potentially affecting Resnica’s parliamentary representation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of political culture, implying that Mijič's behavior reflects systemic issues within the political system. The emphasis on the potential impact on Resnica's parliamentary seats suggests a concern over the integrity of the political process, aligning more

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source, including the confirmation from the faculty and the internal party response. It maintains consistency with the reported facts and adds context about the political implications.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but leans towards criticizing the party for protecting Mijič, which introduces a slight bias.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

The article discusses ongoing legal and labor issues involving the family-owned company Progros in Slovenia. Inspectors first visited the company in February 2023 but did not disclose the nature of their investigation. Later that year, inspectors discovered that employees had not received their annual bonuses for 2023, which the company attributed to a lack of awareness regarding legal deadlines. The inspectorate issued fines and later blocked the company’s accounts, leaving employees unpaid. During inspections, it was also found that Progros had delayed registering employees into health and pension insurance systems, resulting in additional penalties. In November 2024, another inspection took place at one of the company’s construction sites, though no violations were noted. In early 2025, several employees realized they had been incorrectly marked as having resigned, despite not signing such documents. These resignations were allegedly submitted during a period when Boris Mijič, now the company’s director and owner, was still acting as a proxy. Employees reported these issues to authorities, including the police, but faced challenges due to the company’s lack of registered office.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from inspections and legal proceedings against Progros, without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from the company, mentions of fines, and details of employee grievances, providing a balanced account of the situation.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately describes the situation at the restaurant where Mijič’s company was involved, citing specific financial discrepancies and legal actions taken. It corroborates the primary source’s claims about Mijič’s financial obligations and the consequences of his actions.

Why objectivity (75): The tone is factual and impartial, focusing on the reported events without expressing strong opinions. It presents both the actions of Mijič and the responses from the restaurant owners in a balanced way.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 80Objective 706 days ago

Some former employees of the construction company Progros, owned by MP Boris Mijič, are demanding over 41,000 euros in unpaid wages, regressions, and other entitlements. The workers have not yet received an official payment request, prompting them to hire a detective, according to the website Necenzurirano. The total claims from 13 former employees amount to 41,285 euros, including unpaid salaries, regressions, holiday compensation, and other benefits dating back to spring 2025. Additional amounts include contributions and taxes that the employer was supposed to settle. The actual debt owed by Progros is higher due to these additional costs. The company has no remaining assets to cover debts, and previous creditors have already seized some assets. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) has initiated enforcement proceedings against Progros, which owes over 30,000 euros. Additionally, Progros has outstanding debts to a local restaurant, which was unable to collect payments for meals prepared for its employees. Due to blocked bank accounts, Progros cannot enforce debts through court, despite having obtained enforcement orders. The company owes over 3,600 euros to the餐厅. MP Mǐ

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around the personal financial mismanagement of MP Boris Mijič, highlighting his alleged dishonesty regarding education and his failure to repay debts. While the focus is on the company’s financial issues, the emphasis on Mijič’s personal accountability and potential dism

Why factuality (80): The article provides factual information about the debt owed by Mijič's company but doesn't directly reference the primary source regarding his education. It focuses on financial aspects rather than the educational claim itself.

Why objectivity (70): The article remains relatively neutral in tone while reporting facts about the debt. However, it doesn't address the educational controversy mentioned in the primary source, making it less comprehensive.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 7510 days ago

The article discusses the financial disputes between Boris Mijič, a member of parliament for the Slovenian Radical Party, and the owners of a restaurant in Slovenia. Mijič's company, Progros, was involved in providing meals to construction workers over three months at a reduced cost. However, after the first month, Mijič failed to settle four bills totaling over €3,600. The restaurant owners attempted to recover the debt through legal channels, but Mijič closed his company’s accounts, preventing them from accessing funds despite a court order. Mijič now works through his wife’s company, which has shifted focus to construction. His parents, who previously owned Progros, continue to be involved in related businesses, including new companies that may absorb debts from Progros. The article highlights public skepticism towards Mijič’s parliamentary role, noting that many voters are disillusioned with politicians and believe he should resign due to past legal issues.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Mijič's actions and personal connections in a manner that suggests potential conflicts of interest and ethical concerns, particularly highlighting his family's continued involvement in business despite his legal troubles. It emphasizes public distrust in politicians and implies a左

Why factuality (70): Article states that Mijič’s company owes money to a restaurant, citing unprocessed invoices and legal proceedings. Cross-source consensus supports these claims. Some details are repeated from earlier articles, but overall the information is consistent.

Why objectivity (75): Tone remains neutral, focusing on reported events without expressing judgment. Language is factual and straightforward.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressive

The article reveals that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliamentary group Resni.ca, falsely promised employees of his company Progros that he would pay their outstanding wages by the end of 2026. However, prior to this public commitment, Mijič had already taken steps to legally transfer ownership of the company to Rok Snežič, a tax advisor based in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This move effectively absolved Mijič of any financial responsibility toward the company’s debts. The article highlights that Snežič has no assets or bank account, making it nearly impossible for former employees or the state to recover the owed money. Additionally, the new director of Progros, Snežič, is registered at an address without a house number in Bosnia and Herzegovina, further complicating efforts to hold him accountable.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critically examines the actions of Boris Mijič, a politician affiliated with the left-wing party Resni.ca, exposing what it describes as deceptive behavior and legal maneuvering to avoid financial obligations. The tone is investigative and critical of Mijič's conduct, suggesting a left-

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressive

The article discusses the financial insolvency and legal issues surrounding Boris Mijič's former company, Progros. It reveals that despite Mijič publicly promising to settle all debts by year-end, he transferred the company assets to Rok Snežič without proper compensation, effectively ending Progros' operations. The company ceased functioning in early 2025, leaving employees unpaid and failing to meet tax obligations, leading to its classification as insolvent under Slovenian law. Although Mijič could have initiated bankruptcy proceedings by September 2025, this has not occurred, raising concerns about his responsibility and potential legal liability. The article highlights ongoing legal actions against Mijič for alleged fraud towards both employees and the public.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Boris Mijič's actions as fraudulent and deceptive, emphasizing his failure to fulfill promises to employees and the public. It portrays him as having manipulated legal structures to avoid accountability, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of corporate and political elites.

NecenzuriranoIndependentProgressive

The article discusses Rok Snežič, who has filed numerous lawsuits against the media outlet Necenzurirano, including 60 private criminal and compensation claims. Despite losing all cases, Snežič lacks funds to pay court costs and owes €25,000 to the outlet. The article highlights his financial situation, noting he owns a villa in Maribor while living modestly. It connects Snežič to Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni party, whose business practices have been scrutinized. Mijič allegedly promised employees payment but failed to deliver, leading to legal issues. The article suggests Snežič is involved in Mijič’s financial affairs, possibly through a network linked to money laundering. The piece criticizes both individuals' actions and their impact on public trust.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective toward Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič, accusing them of financial misconduct, fraud, and failure to fulfill obligations to employees. The tone is strongly condemnatory, highlighting their alleged illegal activities and lack of accountability. The framing uses贬

Zanima.meIndependentProgressiveyesterday

The article discusses the reactions to the Slovenian company Klukec d.o.o., which was created by transferring Boris Mijič’s company Progros to tax advisor Rok Snežič. The rebranding included adding 'rejo camels' as a registered activity, which Snežič claimed was a political provocation linked to Leftist coordinator Luka Mesec. Responses ranged from criticism, including condemnation from Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Council and party Resnica, to humorous and supportive comments from various individuals and politicians. The article also mentions Tadej Pogačar breaking a record at the Tour de France.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of Rok Snežič and Boris Mijič as politically motivated, linking them to Leftist figures like Luka Mesec. While the article presents both critical and positive responses, the emphasis on the political implications and the support from Left-aligned figures (such as AstaV

Zanima.meIndependentProgressiveyesterday

The article discusses a political conflict between Luka Mesec, a coordinator for the Left Party in Slovenia, and Rok Snežič, a former member of the Resnica party. Mesec had previously criticized Snežič as a criminal, leading to a legal dispute where Mesec won a lawsuit against Snežič, who was unable to pay the court costs due to lack of financial resources. In retaliation, Snežič took over Mesec’s former employer, Progros, renamed it Klukec, and changed its activity to camel breeding. This move was seen as a strategic attempt to undermine Mesec by giving him a 'business opportunity' through the new company. However, the article notes that Snežič's wife is the actual owner of the company, making it unlikely that Mesec could acquire it. The renaming of the company to Klukec, which rhymes with Mesec's name, and the introduction of camel farming were interpreted as sarcastic and politically motivated actions, highlighting the ongoing political rivalry between the parties involved.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a political maneuvering where Rok Snežič, representing the opposition, uses a business takeover as a form of retaliation against Luka Mesec, a member of the Left Party. The tone suggests that Snežič's actions are politically motivated and intended to undermine Mes

DnevnikIndependent🔒Progressive2 days ago

The article discusses the failure of the business firm Progros and criticizes politician Boris Mijič for his handling of the situation. It highlights how Mijič claimed responsibility publicly but avoided personal financial accountability, leaving debts unpaid to workers and the state while remaining in parliament. The piece suggests that the issue reflects a broader problem of who bears the cost of decisions in Slovenia, with citizens, workers, and taxpayers ending up paying the price rather than those in leadership positions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of politician Boris Mijič in a critical light, suggesting he evades personal responsibility by using public platforms to claim accountability while avoiding financial consequences. The tone implies a critique of political leaders prioritizing their positions over moral

Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressive2 days ago

The article discusses a situation where Luka Mesec, a Slovenian politician, publicly expressed his desire to gain experience in business after winning a legal case against Rok Snežič. His wish has now come true in an unexpected manner. Boris Mijić, a member of parliament, transferred his struggling company Progros to Snežič for free. Snežič renamed the company to 'Klukec' (a play on Mesec's name) and added camel breeding as a new activity, which has little competition in Slovenia. Snežič explained that he took over the company to allow Mesec to eventually become the owner through a transitional phase. Mesec criticized this as 'extremely poor sense of humor,' but the fact remains that he had publicly stated his intention to become a business owner. Legal experts have criticized the transfer as a form of abuse of legal entities and warned of potential legal consequences. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the transfer and its implications for accountability.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a politically motivated maneuver by politicians to avoid responsibility, highlighting the misuse of legal entities and the lack of accountability. It emphasizes the public statement by Mesec and criticizes the actions of Mijić and Snežič as a form of evasion, with

DnevnikIndependent🔒Center2 days ago

Predsednik Notarske zbornice Slovenije Bojan Podgoršek je dejal, da je notar pri prenosu poslovnega deleža podjetja Progros s poslanca Resnice Borisa Mijiča na Roka Snežiča ne mogel odkloniti sestave notarskega zapisa, ker so bili pogoji za to neizpolnjeni in ni bil storjen noben nemoralen dejanje. Podgoršek je pojasnil, da je prenos urejen v zakonu o gospodarskih družbah, ki predstavlja eno najstrožjih v Evropi, in da notar ima preventivno funkcijo, ki vključuje pregled določenih pogojev. Natančne razlage je podrobno razvil, kot so omejitve, preverjanje v sodnem registru, ter definicija fiktivnega posla. Tudi glede premoženja podjetja je poudaril, da prenos ne vpliva na upnike, njihov položaj se ne poslabša.

Bias read (Center): Artikel predstavlja objektivno razlago notarskega procesa pri prenosu poslovnega deleža, brez evidentnega političnega slanja ali preferenc. Vsebinske informacije so osnovane na zakonskih predpisih in profesionalnih razlagah, kar kaže na neutralnost. Ne obstaja jasna tendencija v izboru izvorov ali p

VečerIndependent🔒Progressive2 days ago

On July 24, 2026, Slovenian Minister of Economy, Labour, and Sport Anže Logar criticized the transfer of the company Progros from MP Boris Mijič of the Freedom Party to Rok Snežič, describing it as a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions. Logar stated this action reflects a poor sense of humor and indicates dysfunction within the legal state. He emphasized the need for strict anti-corruption measures, reducing waiting lists in healthcare, and improving labor protections. The ministry reiterated its stance against any circumvention of legislation and unethical practices, calling for stronger legal frameworks to protect workers and ensure effective oversight by relevant authorities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of Progros as a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions, using strong negative language ('norčevanje', 'nedelovanje pravne države') and emphasizes anti-corruption and worker protection policies typically associated with leftist agendas. The tone criticizes a右

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenter2 days ago

The article discusses the legal implications of transferring ownership of the insolvent company Progros from Boris Mijič to Rok Snežič. It explains that while the change in ownership does not affect the company’s obligations or its ability to meet debts, the transfer could be problematic if it is intended to evade responsibility rather than resolve the company's financial issues. Legal experts clarify that the company remains responsible for its debts, and both previous and current management bodies share responsibility for managing insolvency. The article highlights concerns that such transfers might be used to avoid accountability.

Bias read (Center): While the article touches on legal and economic matters related to corporate insolvency, which can have political implications, the framing remains balanced by presenting expert opinions from both legal perspectives without overtly favoring any particular political stance. The focus is on legal and財

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive2 days ago

In July 2026, Minister for Economy, Labour, and Sport Anže Logar agreed with former Labour Minister Luka Mesec that the transfer of insolvent company Progros from Boris Mijič to tax advisor Rok Snežič was a mockery of unpaid workers and state institutions. The company, which owes at least €10,000 to employees and €30,000 to the state, was renamed Klukec and registered as a camel breeding business. This move has been criticized as a legal and ethical violation, undermining trust in the state. Logar emphasized the need for strict anti-corruption measures, reducing waiting times in healthcare, and protecting workers' rights. The Ministry of Labour condemned any manipulation of legislation and unethical behavior, stressing the importance of equal application of the law.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a mockery of workers and state institutions, criticizes the transfer of the company as unethical, and emphasizes the need for anti-corruption measures, stronger worker protections, and improved governance. These points align with progressive values such as holding

Žurnal24IndependentProgressive2 days ago

Minister za gospodarstvo, delo in šport Anže Logar je na družbenem omrežju X odgovoril na kritiko, ki jo je izrazil Luka Mesec glede brezplačnega prenosa podjetja Progros poslanca Resnice Borisa Mijiča na Roka Snežiča. Logar je ocenil, da gre za 'norčevanje iz neplačanih delavcev' in 'nedelovanje pravne države', kar pomeni, da se ne izpolnjujejo dogovorni obvezavitvi med delavci in podjetjem. Njegova izjava je bila v kontekstu debat o pravni državi, korupciji in zaščiti delavcev. Poslanska skupina stranke Demokrati je izrazila upanje, da bo opozicija v naslednjem koraku delovala bolj konstruktivno. Na ministrstvu so poudarili pomembnost pravnih okvirjev za varstvo delavcev in učinkovitost institucij, kot je inšpektorat za delo.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel ima levičarski okvir, ker kritizira 'norčevanje' in 'nedelovanje pravne države', kar je pogosto levičarska teza. Tudi izjava, da je 'skok še bolj potreben', in poudarek na zaščiti delavcev in pravni državi, so elementi, ki se pogosto pojavljajo v levičarski politiki. Poudarek na korupciji in

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressive2 days ago

The article discusses a controversy involving Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, who was at the center of an affair regarding unpaid obligations to his company Progros' employees and the state. Mijič allegedly gifted his company to businessman Rok Snežič, who decided to take over the business because Luka Mesec, a coordinator of the Left Party, has legal authority over Snežič's assets. Mesec criticized the move as absurd and called for those who find it funny to imagine being in the position of workers not paid by Mijič. Mesec emphasized that this is not about left or right but about whether we allow fraud, lies, and violence to become values. He stated he would not enforce legal actions against Snežič's new company, citing ongoing lawsuits and financial issues. Minister Anže Logar, leader of the Democratic Party, condemned the situation as mockery of workers and state institutions, highlighting the erosion of trust in the rule of law.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a critique of political figures like Mijič and Mesec, emphasizing the misuse of power and the failure of institutional accountability. While both politicians are mentioned, the narrative leans toward condemning the actions of Mijič and supporting Mesec's stance on the

Siol.netState / PublicProgressive2 days ago

The article discusses the transfer of ownership of the Progros company from MP Boris Mijič to Rok Snežič, which was previously renamed Klukec, a company involved in animal breeding. Snežič confirmed the transfer and stated he took over the company intentionally to allow former Minister for Labour Luka Mesec to potentially acquire it based on a legal decision regarding enforcement. The Financial Administration of Slovenia (Furs) clarified that while the change in ownership structure occurred, the company remains a debtor and its existence and ability to meet obligations remain unaffected. In response, Mesec denied plans to take over the company, and parliamentary groups 'Gibanje Svoboda' and SD expressed concern about the situation of employees.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the transfer of ownership as a strategic move by Snežič to facilitate potential acquisition by a former minister, implying political maneuvering. It highlights concerns raised by parliamentary groups about employee welfare, suggesting a focus on social implications. While not ideo

DnevnikIndependent🔒Center2 days ago

The article discusses the financial maneuvering of Slovenian politician Boris Mijič, who transferred ownership of his company Progros to Rok Snežič without paying off debts owed to creditors. The article quotes Katja Kokot, leader of Mijič’s political party, who comments on the move. Kokot states that Mijič has not eliminated the debts but has legally transferred them to the new owner, Snežič. She emphasizes that the debts remain tied to the company and that the new owner, Snežič, has publicly stated he intends to pursue legal action against Mijič for unpaid debts. Kokot supports the legality of the transfer but expresses concern over the potential impact on creditors. The article also mentions that Snežič changed the company name and activities, and Kokot suggests that while some workers have been paid, others still await resolution.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue by quoting Kokot's concerns about the debt situation and her support for the legal transfer. It does not overtly favor one political stance over another, maintaining a balanced approach between the actions of Mijič and the implications for creditors. The