ON
← Back to feed
MEP Aleksander Reberšek: an audit of the purchase of rescue helicopters should be carried out
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives7 hr. ago

MEP Aleksander Reberšek: an audit of the purchase of rescue helicopters should be carried out

Member of Parliament Aleksander Reberšek has called for an audit of the purchase of specialized helicopters for emergency medical services, citing concerns that the tender process was tailored to a specific supplier. The contract, signed by former police director Damjan Petrič with Italian firm Leonardo last October, involves the procurement of two helicopters valued at nearly €37 million including maintenance, with potential for a 30% increase. Reberšek argues these helicopters are not truly specialized for rescue operations and highlights technical shortcomings, such as lack of rear access to patients during flight and insufficient tail load capacity—both critical for mountain and challenging rescue scenarios. He also criticizes the government for failing to establish a third helicopter base before purchasing the aircraft and notes criticism from medical professionals regarding the chosen model’s inadequacy for emergency care.

A Slovenian MP has called for an independent audit into the procurement of rescue helicopters used for emergency medical services, citing concerns over potential favoritism towards a specific supplier during the tender process. The request was made by Aleksander Reberšek, a member of the NSi party, who accused the government of potentially violating transparency standards in its decision-making regarding the purchase of two specialized helicopters. According to Reberšek, the contract was signed last October by then-general director of police Damjan Petrič with the Italian company Leonardo for the acquisition of two helicopters intended for emergency medical assistance. The first helicopter was scheduled to be delivered in October 2027, while the second was set for February 2028. The total value of the deal, including maintenance, is nearly 37 million euros, with the possibility of increasing the cost by up to 30 percent. Reberšek argues that the helicopters purchased are not actually specialized for rescue operations. He claims that some criteria in the tender documentation were tailored specifically to a particular bidder. He pointed out that instead of acquiring two multi-purpose helicopters for around 50 million euros, the government could have procured three fully dedicated rescue helicopters using the same budget. In his parliamentary motion, Reberšek criticized the current government led by Robert Golob for failing to establish a third helicopter base before proceeding with the purchase. He noted that professional circles had expressed strong criticism of the chosen Leonardo helicopters. The sections for urgent medicine and rescue services within the healthcare sector explicitly warned that the selected model does not meet key medical requirements. Specifically, it does not allow access to the patient's head from behind during flight, a necessity for critically injured patients. Additionally, the helicopter lacks a tail with sufficient lifting capacity (at least 270 kg) and does not support rear loading of patients, both essential features for mountainous and other demanding rescue scenarios. Reberšek emphasized that the organization of the helicopter emergency medical service (HENM), as outlined by the Golob government, lacks transparency and raises suspicions of corruption. He stated that Slovenia deserves the best possible setup for HENM and therefore submitted the motion requesting an audit of the HENM project and the procurement of specialized helicopters for emergency medical care. The procurement process began under the previous administration, which had already initiated discussions on the need for modernized emergency medical equipment. However, the current government has continued with the existing plans despite ongoing scrutiny from both political opponents and experts in the field. The issue has sparked debate among various stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and public officials, who question whether the chosen helicopters will effectively serve their intended purpose. Some argue that the selection process should have been more transparent and inclusive of alternative suppliers. The government has yet to respond formally to the call for an audit, though officials have previously defended the procurement decisions as necessary for improving emergency response capabilities. They have not commented on the allegations of favoritism or the criticisms raised by medical professionals. The motion has been referred to relevant committees for further examination, and it remains to be seen how the government will address the concerns raised by Reberšek and others. The outcome of this review could significantly impact future procurement processes and the overall structure of emergency medical services in Slovenia.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentProgressiveFactual 94Objective 882 days ago
MEP Aleksander Reberšek: an audit of the purchase of rescue helicopters should be carried out

Member of Parliament Aleksander Reberšek has called for an audit of the purchase of specialized helicopters for emergency medical services, citing concerns that the tender process was tailored to a specific supplier. The contract, signed by former police director Damjan Petrič with Italian firm Leonardo last October, involves the procurement of two helicopters valued at nearly €37 million including maintenance, with potential for a 30% increase. Reberšek argues these helicopters are not truly specialized for rescue operations and highlights technical shortcomings, such as lack of rear access to patients during flight and insufficient tail load capacity—both critical for mountain and challenging rescue scenarios. He also criticizes the government for failing to establish a third helicopter base before purchasing the aircraft and notes criticism from medical professionals regarding the chosen model’s inadequacy for emergency care.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents allegations of corruption and mismanagement in a government procurement project, highlighting concerns over transparency and the suitability of the purchased equipment. It frames the issue as a failure of governance and calls for accountability, which aligns with a left-leaning,

Why factuality (94): The article provides specific details about the proposed audit by MP Aleksander Reberšek regarding the purchase of rescue helicopters, including the company involved (Leonardo), the contract value (~37 million euros with an option to increase by 30%), and the timeline (helicopters expected in 2027 a

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, quoting statements from Reberšek and citing concerns raised by medical experts. However, it uses phrases like 'utemeljene sume' ('well-founded suspicions') and 'izrecno opozorili' ('explicitly warned'), which slightly imply judgment r

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressive7 hr. ago
The initiative to review the purchase of helicopters for emergency medical aid: who can be concerned?

The article discusses concerns over the purchase of new helicopters for emergency medical services in Slovenia, highlighting criticisms from medical professionals and lawmakers. The purchase, valued at nearly €37 million including VAT, was finalized after the rejection of a request by the Public Procurement Commission to annul the procurement due to alleged legal violations. Medical experts argue that the new helicopters lack essential medical equipment and fail to meet safety standards for critical care during flights. They emphasize the need for helicopters designed specifically for emergency medical transport, which include adequate space for patients and proper medical facilities. Lawmaker Aleksander Reberšek has called for a review of the procurement process, alleging that the tender specifications were biased towards a specific supplier, resulting in suboptimal equipment being acquired.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the helicopter procurement as a legitimate concern involving potential corruption and mismanagement, emphasizing the negative impact on healthcare quality. It highlights the voices of medical professionals and lawmakers who challenge the decision, suggesting a pro

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories