So let's take Peterlet's explanation seriously and ask ourselves, where are "Cebina" and "Pola" now?

On April 10, 2026, following the elections held on March 22, the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia was constituted. Zoran Stevanović, leader of the smallest parliamentary party, Resnica, was elected as the president of the assembly. On May 22, the National Assembly elected Janez Janša as the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia, and his government was confirmed on June 4, 2026. Just under a month has passed since the government began its term. It is time for an initial review of the situation within the National Assembly. Since its constitution, the assembly has not held a single regular session up to this point. In the nearly three months since its formation, it has conducted fourteen extraordinary sessions. Even before the government was elected, the assembly primarily used abbreviated procedures to adopt several laws that significantly impact public life. Some of these laws include the Law on Intervention Measures for the Development of Slovenia, which alters ten different existing laws. This law combines content that cannot be subject to a referendum—such as finance and taxes—with content that can be decided upon via referendum. The law is currently being reviewed by the Constitutional Court, which will determine whether a referendum on the matter is permissible. Another law is the Law on Parliamentary Inquiry, which removes certain constitutional protections that could prevent the misuse of parliamentary inquiry committees for political disputes. Efforts are underway to collect verified signatures for a referendum on this issue, with more than 35,000 of the required 40,000 signatures already gathered. The third notable law is the Law on Local Elections, which strips the right to participate in local elections from residents of third countries who have permanent residence in Slovenia. Again, efforts are being made to gather support for a referendum on this issue. While the parliament effectively governs and regularly imposes restrictions, the actual government appears to be more ideological in nature. This marks the first instance in the history of Slovenian parliamentary democracy where the agenda for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly was not approved, and thus no session took place. The President of the National Assembly voted against approving the session's agenda, despite having called the session himself. This represents a serious contradiction within the role of the President of the Assembly itself. By failing to approve the session’s agenda, the National Assembly prevented the establishment of a parliamentary inquiry commission, which according to Article 93 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia must be formed if requested by at least 30 members of parliament. This action directly violates the constitution. The prevalence of abbreviated procedures in passing laws that fundamentally alter social conditions and infringe upon individuals' rights signifies a deviation from established parliamentary practices and indicates a form of coercion within legislative processes. Pavel Gantar The President of the National Assembly recently visited the Serbian Parliament during his first “parliamentary” trip. He supported the current Serbian political authority, which faces significant legitimacy issues and has been dealing with mass civil protests for over a year and a half. It did not occur to him to meet, even informally and outside formal protocol, with representatives of Serbian democratic movements. As for the government, given that just under a month has passed since its election, ministers and ministerial officials continue to enjoy their positions and bask in the glow of their roles, except for one who chose to focus on powerful floodlights illuminating otherwise abandoned highway construction sites. They work diligently but remain relatively quiet about their activities, and problems are beginning to arise. An interesting paradox exists: while the parliament effectively governs and regulates our social and political lives with numerous laws, imposing restrictions each week, the actual government seems more ideological than not. The largest ideological shift is a complete reversal in the relationship with Israel and Palestine. The government announced plans to freeze recognition of Palestine. This makes little sense, as once recognition is granted, it becomes consumed and cannot be frozen or revoked without risking the possibility that someone might hypothetically revoke the recognition of our country as well. The Prime Minister's announcement that the government would proceed with this move remains pending.