A company in the North Sea, through an online fraud, stole tens of thousands of euros

LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 857 days ago

A resident in Maribor, Slovenia, fell victim to a new online scam after clicking on a Facebook link that promised to turn her money into wealth. The victim was tricked into purchasing Bitcoin vouchers worth €250 each, following instructions from an unknown person who spoke in Serbian-Croatian. She continued buying vouchers and sending codes to the scammer, who then converted them into cash, resulting in a total loss of approximately €35,000. Police are warning people to be cautious of online offers promising quick profits and not to share codes, passwords, or financial information with strangers based on phone calls.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal incident involving fraud and police warnings, which are standard law enforcement actions. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content remains neutral and factual, focusing on the event itself and the police advisory.

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information about a scam involving Bitcoin coupons and phone calls, matching the cross-source narrative of similar scams reported elsewhere. It includes specifics like the amount lost (35,000 euros) and the method used, which aligns with multiple sources. No significan

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias. It focuses on warning readers rather than taking sides, though it uses slightly emotive language when describing the victim’s experience.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 905 days ago

Residents of Maribor have fallen victim to cryptocurrency scams over the past week, losing more than 260,000 euros collectively. The fraud involved individuals being tricked into granting access to their bank accounts or directly transferring money under the pretense of secure investments or payouts. In several cases, victims lost tens of thousands of euros after falling for these schemes. Local police have warned residents to remain cautious and emphasized the importance of preserving communication records with scammers to aid in investigations. They advise against deleting apps, messages, or emails related to the scam and recommend discontinuing contact with anyone offering quick profits or 'found' funds.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a series of financial crimes involving cryptocurrency scams affecting citizens in Maribor. It provides factual information about the incidents, quotes police warnings, and includes advice for the public. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language; the focus is

Why factuality (85): The article discusses new forms of cyber fraud via electronic messages, emphasizing the need for vigilance. It accurately represents FURS’s warnings and advises users not to share personal data. The information is consistent with other reports on similar scams.

Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and advisory, focusing on educating readers without taking sides or using emotive language. It presents the facts clearly and recommends actions based on expert guidance.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days ago

The article reports two cases of online fraud involving cryptocurrency in Slovenia. In Maribor, a woman responded to a financial investment advertisement and allowed an unknown person access to her online banking, resulting in over 50,000 euros being stolen from her account. Police advise victims to collect all available documentation, including emails, transaction data, mobile numbers, email addresses, and IP addresses, and report the incident immediately to the police and their bank. Another victim from Ptuj was convinced by an unknown caller that his funds had been enhanced, allowing the scammer access to his online banking, leading to a loss of 24,000 euros.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about cybercrime incidents without any ideological framing, editorializing, or biased language. It focuses on providing warnings and advice from law enforcement rather than taking a stance on broader political issues.

Why factuality (85): This article outlines two separate fraud cases, both involving online deception. It provides specific details about the losses and the methods used by scammers. The information is consistent with other reports, though it focuses more on individual cases rather than the broader trend.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative and cautionary, with a focus on helping readers understand how they might be targeted. While it presents the facts clearly, it sometimes uses emotionally charged language to highlight the consequences of falling victim to these scams.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 857 days ago

The article discusses a scam involving a fake surgeon from Asia who defrauded someone of 24,000 euros. It explains common tactics used by scammers, such as building trust through attentive and friendly behavior online, social media, or email. Scammers often ask for money, gifts, or bank account details under various pretenses. The police advise victims not to feel ashamed if they realize they've been scammed and to immediately cut off contact with the perpetrator while preserving all correspondence and reporting the incident to the police.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a scam without overtly criticizing or praising any political group, ideology, or institution. It focuses on general advice for preventing fraud rather than taking a stance on specific policies or political actors.

Why factuality (85): This article reiterates the details of the romantic scam described in Articles 5 and 6. It confirms the loss amount and the method used by the scammer. The information is consistent with other reports, though it doesn’t add new insights or broader context.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative but leans toward storytelling, emphasizing the emotional aspect of the scam. While it serves an educational purpose, it may not remain entirely neutral in its presentation.

LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 858 days ago

The Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (FURS) has issued a warning about new attempts of online fraud. Some citizens have received fake electronic messages aimed at obtaining their personal data through deception. FURS emphasizes that these messages are not sent by the financial administration and urges recipients to exercise special caution. They advise deleting such messages, avoiding clicking on any links, and never entering personal or sensitive information. FURS also reminds users to remain vigilant regarding suspicious links, requests for data sharing, and messages that create a sense of urgency or pressure.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a cybersecurity alert issued by a governmental body without taking sides or expressing ideological preferences. The tone remains neutral, focusing solely on informing the public about potential threats without promoting any particular political agenda.

Why factuality (85): This article reports on multiple cases of cryptocurrency fraud in Maribor, with detailed accounts of individual victims and financial losses. It aligns with other sources in terms of the nature of the scams and the police response. Specific figures are mentioned, supporting the factual consistency.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative and cautionary, with an emphasis on raising awareness. While it presents the facts clearly, it occasionally uses emotionally charged language when describing the impact of the fraud on individuals.

Gorenjski glasIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 80yesterday

An article published by Gorenjski glas warns readers about a phishing scam where fake emails appear to come from Slovenia's Financial Agency, offering tax refunds. The fraudulent message urges recipients to click on a link, but the email was sent from a non-official domain 'edavki-po.com'. Experts from SI-CERT explain this is a common phishing attack, advising users not to open links or provide personal information. Similar scams have been reported using the Statistical Office's domain to gather business data, which could lead to more sophisticated cyberattacks like BEC (Business Email Compromise).

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a cybersecurity threat without taking a political stance. It focuses on informing readers about a phishing scam and provides expert advice from SI-CERT, maintaining neutrality in its framing.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes a phishing attempt involving a fake email from the Financial Agency, citing the false domain 'edavki-po.com' as evidence. It references SI-CERT as an authority on cybersecurity threats and explains the nature of phishing attacks. The content aligns with common knowle

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains informative and advisory, warning readers not to engage with the fake email. While the article presents the situation clearly, it slightly leans toward caution rather than neutrality, but does not introduce subjective bias or emotional language.

LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago

The police in Maribor have reported several cases of cryptocurrency fraud within a few days, resulting in losses exceeding €261,000. Victims were tricked into granting access to their bank accounts or transferring money under the false belief that they were making secure investments or receiving funds. In one case, a victim lost over €24,000 after allowing scammers access to their account. Another individual lost €75,000 after being convinced there was €10,000 worth of cryptocurrency on their account. Others lost €40,000, €55,000, and €42,000 respectively. The police warn victims not to delete communication records or apps used during the scam, as this could hinder investigations. They advise citizens to avoid suspicious offers of quick profits, not share personal or banking information, and refrain from enabling remote access to devices.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on criminal activity involving financial fraud but does not take a stance on any political issue, policy, or official. It provides factual descriptions of incidents and warnings from law enforcement without ideological framing or biased language.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a scam in Celje, where over 10,000 euros were stolen through remote access to banking systems. It aligns with other reports on similar scams and provides specific details about the method and outcome, supporting its factual claims.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and advisory, with a focus on public safety. It presents the facts without emotional embellishment, maintaining a balanced perspective.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

An article reports on a series of scams targeting residents in the area of Maribor police station. The scammers used deceptive promises of safe investments, high returns, and forgotten cryptocurrency funds to trick victims into granting remote access to their online banking accounts. In just a few days, multiple individuals lost significant sums of money, ranging from several thousand to nearly 80,000 euros. Victims were convinced by the fraudsters to provide access to their bank accounts or to send money based on false claims of available funds. The police warn that victims often delete evidence after realizing they've been scammed, which can hinder investigations. They advise citizens to avoid giving personal or financial information to unknown callers, not to grant remote access, and to report suspicious activity immediately.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of fraudulent activities without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political group, ideology, or policy. It focuses on informing the public about a criminal issue and provides practical advice from law enforcement, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on several instances of financial fraud using cryptocurrency, with specific figures and locations. It aligns with other sources discussing similar scams in the region. However, it lacks direct quotes from police or victims, relying more on aggregated reports, which slightly reduc

Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and cautionary, with a focus on public awareness. There is a slight emphasis on the severity of the issue, but it remains largely objective in its presentation.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

The article reports on a series of online scams targeting residents of Maribor, Slovenia. Victims were tricked into granting access to their bank accounts or sending money under false pretenses, such as promises of high returns from cryptocurrency investments or 'found' funds. The losses ranged from over 24,000 euros to more than 75,000 euros. Police emphasize that these incidents are part of a growing trend, with many similar cases involving smaller amounts. They warn victims not to delete communication records or apps, and advise them to avoid suspicious offers, refrain from sharing personal or financial information, and preserve evidence. Authorities urge caution against quick-return investment schemes and remind people to protect their data.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a criminal issue without overt ideological slant. It focuses on police warnings and victim protection measures rather than taking a partisan stance. While the topic involves crime and public safety, which can be politically sensitive, the tone remains客观

Why factuality (85): The article reports on multiple instances of online fraud targeting residents of Maribor, specifically involving cryptocurrency scams. It provides specific figures (e.g., losses exceeding €24,000, €75,000, etc.) and details the modus operandi of scammers. While there is no primary source, the inform

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains informative and cautionary, focusing on warning readers about the risks of falling victim to such scams. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though the article does emphasize the severity of the issue through specific loss figures.

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago

In March 2026, a woman in Maribor became a victim of an online scam where she was misled by false promises of wealth generation through cryptocurrency. The fraud occurred after she clicked on a link shared via Facebook, which led her to contact a man speaking in Serbian-Croatian. He instructed her to purchase Bitcoin coupons at a petrol station, promising that her investment would be 'purified' (plemenitenje). She followed his instructions over several days, sending approximately 35,000 euros in total. The police are investigating the case as a criminal act of deception.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a fraudulent scheme without overt ideological framing. While financial scams can sometimes touch on broader economic or political issues, this specific case focuses on individual criminal activity rather than partisan or policy-related debate. The tone and d

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a similar scam as others, detailing the loss of over 50,000 euros due to trust in false investment promises. It aligns with the broader pattern of these types of scams and provides enough detail to support its claims without contradicting other sources.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and cautionary, with a focus on educating readers about the dangers of trusting unknown sources. It remains largely objective despite the emotional impact of the story.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago

The article reports on a case of 'romance scam' investigated by the Celje Police Station, which is identified as one of the seven most common types of online fraud. The victim, a local resident, connected with a stranger on social media who claimed to be a surgeon in an Asian country. The scammer convinced the woman to transfer approximately €24,000 through multiple transactions. The police emphasize that such scammers often build trust with victims through friendly and emotionally expressive conversations before requesting money, gifts, or bank account details. They urge victims to avoid shame and immediately cut off contact if they suspect fraud, save all correspondence, and report the incident to the police.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a specific instance of cybercrime without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political stance. It focuses on providing information about the nature of romance scams, their methods, and the advice given by authorities, maintaining a balanced tone without明显的左

Why factuality (85): The article reports on fraudulent calls pretending to be from ZZZS, aligning with other accounts of similar scams. It includes specific details about the tactics used and the advice given to the public, which is consistent with other sources. The lack of direct quotes slightly affects the depth of v

Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and advisory, aiming to educate readers about potential scams. It uses cautious language to highlight risks without sensationalizing the situation.

Primorske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday

The article reports on two incidents of fraud in the area of Koper, Slovenia. In both cases, individuals were approached by strangers who claimed to need money urgently. In the first incident, two men from Poland allegedly tricked a man into lending them 400 euros, promising to repay via bank transfer. In the second case, a man approached a Hungarian woman, claiming he had lost his ID card in Zagreb and asked her to lend him 500 euros, assuring him he would send the money back. A woman present showed him a fake transaction confirmation on her phone. The Koper police authority warned citizens to remain vigilant and advised them to report such scams immediately to emergency services.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about fraudulent activities without overtly criticizing or praising any political group, ideology, or policy. It focuses on informing the public about recent scams and advising caution, which aligns with a balanced, center-oriented approach. There is no clear

Why factuality (85): This article corroborates the previous report with similar details about the fraudulent incidents. It includes quotes from the police spokesperson, adding credibility. The information matches the other articles, reinforcing the factual consensus.

Why objectivity (75): The language is alarmist, using phrases like 'predrzne goljufe' (dangerous fraudsters) which may influence reader perception. While intended to raise awareness, this phrasing introduces some bias, affecting objectivity.

Primorske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 752 days ago

The article reports on two incidents of fraud in Koper, Slovenia, where individuals pretended to be married couples from Poland and a man claiming to have lost his wallet in Zagreb sought financial assistance. In both cases, the perpetrators attempted to defraud victims by requesting money via fake online transfers. Police authorities have warned that these actions constitute scams and advised against falling for such schemes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about fraudulent activities without overtly criticizing or praising any political group, ideology, or official. It focuses on law enforcement warnings rather than partisan commentary, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports two incidents of fraud where individuals posing as Polish couples asked for money under false pretenses. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from the other articles, providing specific details such as amounts requested and locations. No primary source was availab

Why objectivity (75): The tone is cautionary and informative, aiming to warn readers about fraud. While not overtly biased, there is a slight editorializing tone in the concluding statement urging vigilance, which slightly reduces objectivity.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 754 days ago

Two residents from Maribor and the surrounding area of Ptuj fell victim to online scams involving cryptocurrency, losing a total of 74,000 euros. One woman was scammed out of over 50,000 euros after responding to an advertisement for financial investment and granting access to her online banking. Another man from Ptuj lost 24,000 euros after answering a call from an unknown person who convinced him his funds had been enhanced and allowed him access to his online banking. Police and investigators are now trying to track down the scammers, though this process is particularly difficult if the crime is not reported immediately.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal investigation involving fraud and does not exhibit any clear ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It presents the facts neutrally, focusing on the victims' experiences and the police's efforts to investigate the scam.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on two online scams involving cryptocurrency, detailing the amounts stolen from victims in Maribor and Ptuja. It cites statements from a police spokesperson, Anita Kovačič, providing specific details about the fraudulent transactions. The information aligns with typical patterns

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the incident in a straightforward manner but uses emotionally charged language such as 'goljufi' (scammers) and describes the victims as 'oškodovanca' (victims of harm), which may imply judgment. While it provides factual information, the tone leans slightly towards portraying t

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 855 days ago

The article reports two cases of online fraud involving cryptocurrency in Slovenia. A woman from Maribor responded to an advertisement offering financial investment opportunities and allowed an unknown person access to her online banking, resulting in over 50,000 euros being stolen from her account. Another victim from Ptuj answered a call from an unknown individual who convinced him that his financial assets had been enhanced and granted him access to his online banking, leading to a transaction of 24,000 euros. These incidents highlight the ongoing issue of cyberfraud despite numerous warnings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about two instances of financial fraud without any apparent ideological framing or biased language. It does not take a stance on the issue but rather informs readers about the occurrence of such crimes.

Why factuality (80): This article discusses a 'love scam' where a woman lost 24,000 euros through online deception. It matches the broader pattern of scams described in other articles, including the methods used and the outcome. While it doesn't reference specific police reports directly, it aligns with the general tren

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the story in a neutral manner, emphasizing the need for vigilance without taking a clearly biased stance. It uses descriptive language but avoids emotional manipulation.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 855 days ago

An individual from Maribor fell victim to an online scam involving cryptocurrency, losing over 50,000 euros from their bank account. The Maribor police are investigating a case of internet fraud where the victim responded to an investment advertisement and allowed access to their online banking. As a result, the perpetrator was able to execute transactions totaling more than 50,000 euros. This incident is part of a broader trend, as police report another similar case where a man from Ptuj was scammed out of 24,000 euros through a similar method.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about two separate cases of financial fraud without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on the criminal activity and the police investigation, maintaining a neutral tone. There is no indication of ideological leaning towards either left or右,尽管

Why factuality (80): This article summarizes multiple incidents of cryptocurrency-related fraud, providing aggregate data on total losses and individual cases. While it lacks specific details on individual victims, it aligns with the cross-source consensus on the scale and nature of these scams.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral and focused on raising awareness. It presents the information in a structured way without showing bias toward any particular group or outcome.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 805 days ago

The article reports on several recent cases of online fraud in Maribor, Slovenia, where victims were deceived into believing they had forgotten cryptocurrency funds or opportunities for safe investments. The perpetrators convinced victims to provide access to their bank accounts or directly send money, resulting in losses ranging from 75,000 to over 55,000 euros. Police warn of the prevalence of such scams and advise against sharing personal or financial information, granting remote access to devices, or sending money to unknown individuals. They emphasize the importance of preserving all communication with scammers to aid investigations and urge victims not to delete evidence. Preventive measures include verifying suspicious communications, avoiding unknown links, and promptly reporting incidents to authorities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on cybercrime incidents without overt ideological framing. It focuses on practical advice and police warnings rather than taking a partisan stance. While the issue of online fraud has broader societal implications, the tone remains neutral and informative, align

Why factuality (80): The article describes a romantic scam where a woman lost €24,000. It provides specific details about the method used by the scammer and the outcome. While the information is consistent with other reports on similar scams, it focuses more on a single case rather than the broader pattern of fraud.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is somewhat dramatic, especially in describing the emotional impact on the victim. While it aims to educate, it leans into storytelling elements that may influence reader perception beyond pure factual reporting.

Info360IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 807 days ago

The article reports on a romantic scam in Celje, Slovenia, where a woman from the area lost approximately €24,000 through online interactions with a man who pretended to be a surgeon in Asia. The police describe this as one of the seven most common internet scams, noting that perpetrators often gain trust by appearing attentive, kind, and empathetic, then ask for financial assistance. They emphasize the importance of immediately contacting the police upon realizing the fraud and preserving all communication records as evidence.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a criminal incident without overt ideological framing. It provides information about a specific crime, explains common tactics used in such scams, and offers practical advice to victims. There is no evident partisan angle or emphasis on political ideology, so

Why factuality (80): This article repeats the story from Article 5, detailing a romantic scam involving a fake surgeon in Asia. It provides similar details about the victim’s loss and the tactics used by the scammer. While consistent with other reports, it lacks additional context or broader analysis.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is again narrative-driven, focusing on the human element of the scam. While it raises awareness, it may not maintain the same level of neutrality as more general informational pieces.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 807 days ago

A woman from the Celje police district was scammed out of approximately €24,000 by a man who introduced himself as a surgeon in an Asian country through social media. The man convinced her to send money via multiple transactions. Police identified this as a 'romance scam,' one of the seven most common online scams. Scammers typically gain victims' trust through social media or dating sites, then ask for money, gifts, or access to bank accounts under various pretenses.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a crime investigation involving financial fraud and police intervention. It provides factual information without taking a stance or showing bias toward any political entity or ideology. The content focuses on law enforcement actions and does not involve political debate or ide

Why factuality (80): This article reports on two separate cases of fraud: one involving cryptocurrency and another involving a romantic scam. It provides specific details about the losses and the methods used. While the information is consistent with other reports, it is somewhat repetitive and lacks deeper analysis.

Why objectivity (80): The tone is cautionary and informative, but it occasionally emphasizes the emotional impact of the fraud on individuals. This can make the article feel more like a warning than a purely factual report.

Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 602 days ago

The article warns about 'foreigners' who tell elaborate stories to scam people out of up to 400 euros. The police are cautioning the public against falling for these scams, which often involve fabricated narratives. Such incidents highlight the need for vigilance against fraudulent activities involving individuals claiming to be from other countries. The focus is on preventing financial loss through deceptive storytelling.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual warning from the police about a specific type of fraud without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on law enforcement action rather than taking a partisan stance. There is no clear ideological framing or emphasis on particular political groups, making a

Why factuality (60): This article is incomplete and lacks specific details about the incidents. It only mentions the police warning without elaborating on the cases, making it less reliable compared to the other articles. The lack of detail limits its factual value.

Why objectivity (60): The article is brief and lacks depth, making it difficult to assess objectivity. It appears to be a summary rather than a full report, possibly leading to a more subjective interpretation due to limited context.