Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives
The bodies of five cows were found under the manure, two of them living in the excrement: the farmer was denounced for torturing the animals
In a farm in Iljaševci, veterinary inspectors discovered severe conditions in August, including two cows standing in their own manure up to their bellies and the corpses of five dead cattle buried under the waste. The farmer, who is a respected expert in cattle management employed by the Kmetijsko-gozdarski zavod (KGZ) Murska Sobota, has been charged with animal cruelty and has lost his job. The incident began with a complaint about unbearable odor, leading to inspections that confirmed the poor conditions. A veterinary pathologist confirmed the deaths occurred over different periods with chronic changes linked to mechanical stress from living in unsuitable conditions. Although the exact time and cause of death could not be determined due to decomposition, the case has sparked significant local attention. The farmer’s professional background adds further weight to the controversy.
A farmer in Iljaševci has been charged with animal cruelty after five cows were found dead under a pile of manure, with two others trapped in feces up to their bellies. The case, which began with complaints about unbearable smells, has led to a criminal investigation. Rejec Marjan Špur, who was employed at the Kmetijsko-gozdarski zavod (KGZ) Murska Sobota as a livestock specialist, faces up to three years in prison if convicted. The incident came to light when veterinarians visited the farm in August following reports of foul odors. They discovered two cows standing in feces reaching up to their bellies. The next day, they uncovered the bodies of five deceased cattle beneath the manure. A pathologist later confirmed that the animals had died due to chronic mechanical stress caused by poor living conditions, though the exact time and cause of death could not be determined because the carcasses were heavily decomposed. Neighbors Sonja and Bojan Žižek told 24ur that the farmer had removed the evidence, making it difficult to determine the cause of death. They described the depth of the manure as nearly reaching the ceiling. The barns are now empty, with locks on the gates and no one available to summon the farmer. Špur, known for his critical approach to livestock management, had previously conducted inspections and advised farmers. According to some accounts, he was particularly strict about hygiene standards. However, the KGZ leadership has terminated his employment, with the termination period still active. The Veterinary Inspection has filed a criminal complaint against Špur for alleged animal cruelty. The court will decide whether he is found guilty. If convicted, he faces up to three years in prison. The case remains under investigation as authorities work to clarify the circumstances surrounding the deaths of the five cows.
An article reports on a case where two cows were found dead in a barn, with their bellies hanging down, and their carcasses covered in pus. A veterinary inspector visited the farm in August and discovered additional corpses hidden under the pus. A pathologist confirmed the cows likely died over time due to chronic changes caused by mechanical stress from poor living conditions, but could not determine the exact cause or time of death. The farmer, Sonja and Bojan Žižek, accuse the accused, who is employed at the Murska Sobota Agricultural and Forestry Institute, of destroying evidence to prevent them from determining the cause of death. The accused, who previously criticized farmers for their practices, now faces potential criminal charges for animal cruelty, with a maximum sentence of three years in prison.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a case of animal cruelty and highlights the conflict between the accused, a professional with authority, and the farmers. It emphasizes the potential legal consequences for the accused, suggesting a critical stance toward institutional figures who may abuse their權
Why factuality (96): The article accurately describes the discovery of five dead cows under manure and two live cows in feces. It includes confirmation from a pathologist and mentions the legal actions taken. It also reports on the farmer’s employment status and the termination of his job. All key points align with the
Why objectivity (80): The article contains more emotionally charged language such as 'ironično pa je' (ironically, however) and 'prelevil' (fell into), which may subtly imply judgment. While it remains mostly factual, the tone occasionally leans toward a critical perspective, slightly reducing its neutrality.
In a farm in Iljaševci, veterinary inspectors discovered severe conditions in August, including two cows standing in their own manure up to their bellies and the corpses of five dead cattle buried under the waste. The farmer, who is a respected expert in cattle management employed by the Kmetijsko-gozdarski zavod (KGZ) Murska Sobota, has been charged with animal cruelty and has lost his job. The incident began with a complaint about unbearable odor, leading to inspections that confirmed the poor conditions. A veterinary pathologist confirmed the deaths occurred over different periods with chronic changes linked to mechanical stress from living in unsuitable conditions. Although the exact time and cause of death could not be determined due to decomposition, the case has sparked significant local attention. The farmer’s professional background adds further weight to the controversy.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a serious violation of animal welfare standards, emphasizing the farmer's professional role and the institutional failure within the agricultural authority. While the focus is on the legal and ethical implications, the tone leans toward holding institutions and/or
Why factuality (95): The article provides detailed information about the discovery of five dead cows under manure and two live cows in feces at a farm in Iljaševci. It mentions the involvement of veterinary inspectors, a pathologist confirming chronic changes due to poor conditions, and the legal action taken by the vet
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the facts neutrally but uses emotionally charged terms like 'grozljiv prizor' (terrifying scene) and 'mučenja živali' (animal cruelty), which may influence reader perception. However, it does not explicitly take sides or editorialize beyond reporting the findings and legal conse
An article reports on a disturbing case at a farm in Iljaševci, Slovenia, where five cows were found dead under a layer of manure, with other animals kept in extremely poor conditions, allegedly without water. The situation was initially reported due to unbearable smells, leading veterinary inspectors to discover the cows buried under excrement. A pathologist confirmed chronic injuries linked to unsuitable living conditions. The farmer, Marjan Špur, faces potential criminal charges for animal cruelty, which could result in up to three years in prison. Local neighbors described the manure pile as reaching nearly to the ceiling, suggesting possible premature removal of remains before determining causes of death. Špur, employed by the Kmetijsko-gozdarski zavod Murska Sobota, has agreed to terminate his employment, having been critical of farming practices.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a lens of ethical responsibility and legal accountability, emphasizing the severity of the conditions and the potential criminal charges against the farmer. While the focus is on the factual report of animal welfare violations, the tone leans toward highlighting,
Why factuality (93): This article accurately reports the discovery of five dead cows hidden under manure and two live cows in feces at the farm. It confirms the involvement of veterinary inspectors and a pathologist, as well as the legal charges against the farmer. It also references neighbor statements, noting they are
Why objectivity (87): The tone remains largely neutral, focusing on factual reporting. Some phrases like 'pretresljiv dogajanje' (shocking events) carry mild emotional weight, but the overall presentation avoids overt bias or opinionated commentary.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
