In his view, the chances of reaching an agreement on the EU's long-term budget by the end of the year are relatively slim.
Prime minister Janez Janša stated that there is only a 35% chance of reaching an agreement on the EU's long-term budget (MFF) for the period 2028–2034 by the end of this year. Slovenia will continue to advocate for maintaining funding for cohesion and agriculture during negotiations, according to Janša. He expressed disappointment that despite Slovenia’s potential, the country remains heavily dependent on cohesion funds. Reflecting on past experiences, he noted that compromises usually occur between those advocating for cohesion funds and those pushing for smaller budgets. The Irish presidency of the Council of the EU has proposed a budget size of around €1,825 billion, which is lower than the European Commission’s previous proposal. While Ireland maintained funding levels for agriculture and cohesion, it reduced allocations for competitiveness, defense, and external action. Prime Minister Janša did not see any innovations in the Irish proposal regarding new revenue sources for the EU budget, which he believes are crucial for finalizing the agreement.
Prime Minister Janez Janša of Slovenia estimates there is a 35 percent chance that leaders of European Union member states will agree on the long-term budget for the bloc by the end of this year. Speaking at the EU summit in Brussels, Janša emphasized that Slovenia will continue to advocate for maintaining funding for cohesion and agriculture policies during negotiations over the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the period 2028–34. “I think the chance of reaching an agreement by the end of the year is 35 percent, nothing more,” Janša said, noting that the MFF will be one of the central topics discussed at the summit. He added that Slovenia will remain firm in its stance to defend funds for the Common Agricultural Policy and cohesion policy. Janša, who has participated in negotiations over the EU’s long-term budget four times before, expressed regret that despite Slovenia's potential, the country still heavily relies on cohesion funds. He recalled his hopes during the negotiations in 2005, when he was part of the government, that Slovenia would soon become one of the countries striving to allocate fewer resources to others rather than seeking more for itself. However, he noted that since 2008, progress has been minimal. According to Janša, given that Slovenia is still deeply embedded in cohesion policies, it is crucial that the group known as the "cohesion friends," which includes Slovenia and 16 other member states, remains united and grows stronger. Based on past experiences, he explained, compromises are typically reached between those advocating for cohesion funds and those pushing for a smaller budget. The Irish presidency of the Council of the EU recently presented a proposal for the negotiation framework, suggesting a budget size of around €1,825 billion, which is €160 billion less than the European Commission's proposal from July of last year. Ireland maintained the level of funding for agriculture and cohesion while reducing allocations for competitiveness, defense, and external action. The Irish proposal also includes some updated suggestions for new own revenue sources for the EU budget. However, Janša did not see any innovations in the Irish proposal. New own revenues, which Slovenia supports, are considered key to finalizing the EU budget agreement for 2028–34, according to European Council President Antonio Costa. Negotiations on these revenues have entered a decisive phase, with the goal of reaching an agreement by the end of the year. In recent days, several member states, including Italy, the Netherlands, and Austria, have stressed that the content of the agreement is more important than the deadline.
Prime minister Janez Janša stated that there is only a 35% chance of reaching an agreement on the EU's long-term budget (MFF) for the period 2028–2034 by the end of this year. Slovenia will continue to advocate for maintaining funding for cohesion and agriculture during negotiations, according to Janša. He expressed disappointment that despite Slovenia’s potential, the country remains heavily dependent on cohesion funds. Reflecting on past experiences, he noted that compromises usually occur between those advocating for cohesion funds and those pushing for smaller budgets. The Irish presidency of the Council of the EU has proposed a budget size of around €1,825 billion, which is lower than the European Commission’s previous proposal. While Ireland maintained funding levels for agriculture and cohesion, it reduced allocations for competitiveness, defense, and external action. Prime Minister Janša did not see any innovations in the Irish proposal regarding new revenue sources for the EU budget, which he believes are crucial for finalizing the agreement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the views of Prime Minister Janez Janša in a neutral manner, quoting his statements directly without apparent bias toward either side of the debate. It includes both his concerns about Slovenia’s reliance on cohesion funds and the broader EU budget negotiations, providing a fact
The European Union is facing division over the proposed budget framework for the next seven years, with Ireland presenting a new proposal that has sparked disagreement among member states. Slovenia, led by Prime Minister Janez Janša, is insisting on maintaining financial support for rural agriculture and cohesion policies. The Irish proposal suggests a significantly lower budget compared to last year’s European Commission plan, which has been criticized by several countries, including Germany, as being too large and not aligned with current challenges. Slovenia, part of the cohesion group of countries, emphasizes the need to preserve funding for agricultural and cohesion policies. Janša expressed frustration that despite Slovenia’s potential, the country remains heavily reliant on cohesion funds and believes there is only a 35% chance of reaching an agreement by the end of the year.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, quoting Prime Minister Janša and outlining the positions of different member states without overtly favoring any side. It provides context on the budget dispute and Slovenia’s stance but does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language or selective,
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.