ON
← Back to feed
‘Pitiful’: Perth mum to appeal after DV thug sentenced without magistrate viewing crucial CCTV footage
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives12 days ago

‘Pitiful’: Perth mum to appeal after DV thug sentenced without magistrate viewing crucial CCTV footage

A Perth woman, Chloe Wright, has expressed outrage after her abusive ex-partner, Guy Cramp, received a 'pitiful' sentence despite critical CCTV evidence of his violent assault on her and their child. Cramp, who had prior convictions for domestic violence, attacked Wright in November 2025, resulting in severe facial injuries requiring surgery. Prosecutors failed to present the full assault footage to the court, including the attack outside her home, and provided limited information about the extent of her injuries. Wright fled with her children after the incident, seeking safety through protective measures. Cramp was released on bail but repeatedly violated court orders, evading police for 12 hours. Wright criticized the judicial process, feeling her suffering was dismissed due to lack of visible harm, and shared the footage publicly to highlight systemic failures in addressing domestic violence.

A Perth woman has vowed to appeal against the sentence handed down to her abusive ex-partner after she claims crucial evidence, footage of the violent attack, was never shown to the magistrate during sentencing. Chloe Wright, who fled the country with her children following the assault, described the outcome as “pitiful.” The incident occurred in November 2025 at her home in Stratton, where her ex-partner, Guy Cramp, attacked her while holding their newborn son. Cramp, 33, had recently been released from jail after serving a brief term for assaulting a taxi driver over a $20 fare. He had previously been incarcerated twice for violent assaults against former partners and had been convicted of attacking his own parents. The assault on Wright took place after she informed him she was going out with a friend. In a fit of jealousy, Cramp punched her in the face while she held their child on the couch. Prosecutors provided the magistrate, Paul Lyons, with limited details about the attack, citing uncertainty regarding the severity of Wright’s injuries. They only mentioned a single instance of physical contact, despite the fact that the assault extended beyond the initial punch and was recorded on Wright’s CCTV system. The footage, which showed Cramp repeatedly striking her and holding their infant during the attack, was shared with the public earlier this year and gained widespread attention online. Wright, who required extensive medical treatment, including rhinoplasty and septoplasty, said she was never given access to the footage and that the prosecution failed to present the full context of the assault to the court. She explained that without her victim impact statement, the court might have been entirely unaware of the extent of her injuries and the long-term consequences of the attack. “I have to have a rhinoplasty and a septoplasty, and I’m on the wait list at Royal Perth Hospital, none of that was brought up by the prosecution,” she said outside court. Following the assault, Wright was placed under protective custody by the Department of Communities with her children. Cramp was released on bail in February to attend a domestic violence offender program but failed to complete more than half of the required sessions. He later removed his ankle monitoring device and evaded police for 12 hours before being apprehended. His actions led to a further charge related to tampering with electronic surveillance equipment. Cramp was ultimately sentenced to 15 months in prison for the assault on Wright and an additional eight months for removing his ankle monitor. He is now eligible for parole and could potentially be released in March 2027, based on time already served. He was also added to the serial domestic violence register, a measure intended to track individuals with repeated offenses. Wright expressed deep frustration over the lack of transparency in the judicial process and the perceived disregard for the harm caused by the attack. “It seemed because I wasn’t stabbed or permanently deformed that I didn’t matter, and what I’ve done doesn’t matter, and I’ve had to change everything in my life. It’s so, it’s so wrong,” she said. She plans to file a formal complaint with Western Australia Police and seek legal recourse through an appeal. The case has sparked broader discussions about the handling of domestic violence cases in the region, particularly regarding the use of video evidence and the responsibilities of prosecutors to ensure all relevant information is presented to the court. Wright’s decision to release the footage publicly highlights ongoing efforts to increase awareness and accountability within the justice system.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8812 days ago
‘Pitiful’: Perth mum to appeal after DV thug sentenced without magistrate viewing crucial CCTV footage

A Perth woman, Chloe Wright, has expressed outrage after her abusive ex-partner, Guy Cramp, received a 'pitiful' sentence despite critical CCTV evidence of his violent assault on her and their child. Cramp, who had prior convictions for domestic violence, attacked Wright in November 2025, resulting in severe facial injuries requiring surgery. Prosecutors failed to present the full assault footage to the court, including the attack outside her home, and provided limited information about the extent of her injuries. Wright fled with her children after the incident, seeking safety through protective measures. Cramp was released on bail but repeatedly violated court orders, evading police for 12 hours. Wright criticized the judicial process, feeling her suffering was dismissed due to lack of visible harm, and shared the footage publicly to highlight systemic failures in addressing domestic violence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the judicial system's handling of domestic violence cases as inadequate and dismissive of victims' experiences. It emphasizes the failure of prosecutors to present full evidence and highlights systemic issues in how such crimes are addressed, aligning with progressive concerns for

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the sequence of events involving Chloe Wright and Guy Cramp, including the assault, prior convictions, and the lack of presentation of CCTV footage to the court. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from The Sydney Morning Herald, providing consistent details abou

Why objectivity (88): The tone of the article leans towards sympathy for Chloe Wright, using phrases like 'pitiful' to describe the sentence. While the facts are presented objectively, the emotional framing suggests a bias toward the victim's perspective.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8812 days ago
‘Pitiful’: Perth mum to appeal after DV thug sentenced without magistrate viewing crucial CCTV footage

A Perth woman, Chloe Wright, expressed frustration after her ex-partner, Guy Cramp, received a lenient sentence for a violent domestic assault that left her with serious injuries. Cramp, who had prior convictions for assault, attacked Wright during a jealous episode while she was holding their infant son. Despite the severity of the incident, the court was not shown critical CCTV footage capturing the assault, which was later shared publicly. Wright required extensive medical treatment, including facial reconstructive surgery, but these details were omitted by prosecutors during sentencing. She criticized the legal system for failing to recognize the gravity of her ordeal, stating that her injuries, though severe, did not seem to matter to the court.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights systemic failures in the justice system regarding domestic violence cases, emphasizing the victim's perspective and criticizing the lack of accountability for the perpetrator. The tone underscores the inadequacy of current legal responses to domestic abuse, aligning with a pro

Why factuality (95): This article mirrors the factual content of the first article, confirming the details about Chloe Wright, Guy Cramp, the assault, and the absence of CCTV footage during sentencing. It maintains consistency with the first article and does not introduce new or conflicting information. The reporting re

Why objectivity (88): Similar to the first article, this piece exhibits a sympathetic tone toward Chloe Wright, using emotionally charged language to frame the situation. While the facts are reported consistently, the narrative subtly supports the victim's perspective, indicating a potential bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories