ON
← Back to feed
Ninamedie's poll. Who are they lying to?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive19 hr. ago

Ninamedie's poll. Who are they lying to?

The article by Tone Kuzma critiques a survey conducted by Ninamedia, questioning its methodology and results. It describes the survey findings as a 'miracle' where politicians' popularity rankings shifted unexpectedly. The piece humorously suggests that the survey results were so surprising that the computer analyzing them turned off, opened a paper tray, and wrote that people still believe in something. It then lists the top three politicians based on this fictional survey—President Nataša Pirc Musar, President of SD Matjaž Han, and Robert Golob from Gibanje Svoboda—with satirical commentary on their political careers. The tone is critical of the survey's credibility while using hyperbole and irony to highlight perceived flaws in political polling.

(PISMO BRALCA) A survey conducted by Ninamedia has revealed surprising results regarding public perception of political figures, with unexpected outcomes that have left analysts baffled. The survey, carried out between July 13th and 15th, involved 700 participants who were contacted via phone and online. The methodology was described as highly unconventional, respondents were asked to set aside their daily routines, including tasks such as searching for socks, watching empty spaces, and pondering why their electricity bill had risen. They were then presented with the question: “Which politician is currently most appealing to you?” This approach, according to the report, was based on a unique blend of crystal balls, three telephone calls, and one individual who had just come from a store and had no idea they were participating in a historical event. The results defied expectations. At the top of the popularity list stood President of the Republic Nataša Pirc Musar, scoring 3.67. This outcome surprised even the computer system responsible for processing the data, which reportedly shut down after the calculation, opened a drawer for paper, and wrote: “I don’t know what I just calculated, but clearly people still believe in something.” Political analysts, particularly those specializing in modern human behavior, have called this phenomenon historic. They suggest that while individuals often forget where they placed their phone, why they opened the refrigerator, or where they put their glasses, they somehow manage to assess the popularity of politicians on a scale from one to five. Scientific explanations for this phenomenon remain elusive. One prevailing theory suggests that voters receive a secret message overnight specifically for the purpose of answering the survey question. However, this remains unverified. Second place went to SD president Matjaž Han. His success appears to validate an old political rule: if you stand quietly near a microphone long enough and repeat the word “dialogue” several times, there’s a high chance people will notice you. Han achieved something almost supernatural in politics, he became popular without scandal, drama, or a video clip showing someone looking in the wrong direction. In the political laboratory, his case has been labeled as “an unusually stable phenomenon.” Experts plan to send his example to German forensic scientists to determine whether he is truly human or simply a well-programmed diplomatic robot. Third place was claimed by Robert Golob from the Freedom Movement. Once a political meteor, known for his dramatic weather forecasts, Golob now circles within the gravitational pull of political space. Observers note that even the brightest comets eventually lose their shine and begin orbiting among other lost objects. Golob’s rise demonstrates that in politics, one can become a supernova in one moment and explain the sudden decrease in stellar dust the next, blaming it on Janez Janša. He has thus proven that it is possible to transition from being a meteor to becoming a forgotten object in the night sky. Following Golob, the list features a range of political figures, each occupying a distinct position in the hierarchy of public favor. Alenka Bratušek, known for her ability to survive all possible political weather conditions, ranks prominently. Matjaž Nemec successfully navigates European corridors, where discussions sometimes take hours over matters that could be resolved with a single phone call. Luka Mesec, master of coalition acrobatics, must maintain balance on three stools, five promises, and one press conference. Asta Vrečko from the Left Party secured the 11th position, placing her in a magical zone of political space, low enough to be questioned about opinions yet high enough to appear in media. Experts refer to this area as the “comfortable political darkness,” a space where one exists without needing to explain why they exist. The survey, conducted by Ninamedia, highlights the unpredictable nature of public sentiment and the complex mechanisms behind it.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 25Objective 1019 hr. ago
Ninamedie's poll. Who are they lying to?

The article by Tone Kuzma critiques a survey conducted by Ninamedia, questioning its methodology and results. It describes the survey findings as a 'miracle' where politicians' popularity rankings shifted unexpectedly. The piece humorously suggests that the survey results were so surprising that the computer analyzing them turned off, opened a paper tray, and wrote that people still believe in something. It then lists the top three politicians based on this fictional survey—President Nataša Pirc Musar, President of SD Matjaž Han, and Robert Golob from Gibanje Svoboda—with satirical commentary on their political careers. The tone is critical of the survey's credibility while using hyperbole and irony to highlight perceived flaws in political polling.

Bias read (Progressive): The article uses sarcastic and exaggerated language to critique the survey's methodology and outcomes, implying skepticism toward political institutions and possibly aligning with a more progressive viewpoint. While not overtly partisan, the tone leans left through its mocking of traditional power-h

Why factuality (25): The article presents a fictionalized and fantastical account of a political popularity poll conducted by Ninamedia, using absurd methods like a crystal ball and a person who just came from a store. There is no evidence or credible sources supporting these claims. The narrative includes fabricated de

Why objectivity (10): The tone is highly sensationalist and lacks neutrality. The article uses exaggerated and imaginative language to describe the poll results, presenting them as if they were factual. It does not present alternative viewpoints or provide balanced analysis, instead focusing solely on the whimsical and u

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories