ON
← Back to feed
Pirnat: Protecting Natasha Pirc Musar is illegal
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Pirnat: Protecting Natasha Pirc Musar is illegal

Dr. Rajko Pirnat, a professor at Ljubljana Law Faculty, stated in the 24UR Zvečer program that the protection of President Nataša Pirc Musar is illegal. He argued that the law from 2003 clearly states that the president should be protected by the police, specifically the Office for Protection and Security. This legal provision has not changed and is more legally binding than any regulation. Previous governments had created different methods of protection that were inconsistent with the system's laws regarding police authority. The current government under Janez Janša adopted a regulation stating that the president’s protection would be handled within the presidential office rather than by the police. Pirnat criticized this as unlawful, emphasizing that the only legitimate form of protection is through the police.

1 reports

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenter7 hr. ago
Pirnat: Protecting Natasha Pirc Musar is illegal

Dr. Rajko Pirnat, a professor at Ljubljana Law Faculty, stated in the 24UR Zvečer program that the protection of President Nataša Pirc Musar is illegal. He argued that the law from 2003 clearly states that the president should be protected by the police, specifically the Office for Protection and Security. This legal provision has not changed and is more legally binding than any regulation. Previous governments had created different methods of protection that were inconsistent with the system's laws regarding police authority. The current government under Janez Janša adopted a regulation stating that the president’s protection would be handled within the presidential office rather than by the police. Pirnat criticized this as unlawful, emphasizing that the only legitimate form of protection is through the police.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Dr. Rajko Pirnat's legal argument against the current method of protecting the president, citing specific legal provisions. It does not show overt bias toward either side but provides his perspective without additional commentary or counterarguments.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories