Pirc Musar Sharp: Such a man should not work in the U.S.
The article discusses comments made by the President of the National Assembly, Alenka Pirc Musar, regarding the actions of MP Boris Mijič from the Resnica party. She criticized his behavior as unacceptable and stated that individuals acting in such a manner should not hold positions in the 'temple of democracy.' The controversy stems from Mijič's claim before the election that he was a graduate engineer, which contradicts information later provided in his biography on the National Assembly website, where he listed the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty confirmed that Mijič is not registered as a graduate there. This discrepancy has led to accusations of misleading the public about his education, prompting calls for disciplinary action within his party. In addition, Pirc Musar emphasized the need for broader political cooperation on key issues like energy self-sufficiency, electoral system reforms, constitutional changes, regional development, demographic challenges, youth care, economic growth, climate change adaptation, and improving political dialogue. She also condemned efforts to obstruct parliamentary democracy by hind
Afera Around MP Boris Mijič Sparks Strongest Measures Threat From Party Leader The controversy surrounding MP Boris Mijič has escalated significantly, prompting Zoran Stevanović, leader of the political party Resnica, to threaten the strictest possible measures against him. According to reports, Mijič falsely claimed he had graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, a claim that has been debunked by the university itself. The faculty confirmed that Mijič was not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis could not be found in the public database. This revelation came after a series of allegations surfaced regarding Mijič's professional conduct, including unpaid wages to employees and financial debts owed to the state. These issues have led to calls for his resignation from both within and outside his party. Stevanović, who has previously condemned dishonesty in politics, most notably criticizing the Left for falsifying election data, has now vowed to take action against Mijič. Stevanović stated during a press conference in the National Assembly that he was only recently informed of the true nature of Mijič’s academic credentials. He emphasized that if Mijič had misled the public, this would mean he had also misled the party. “We cannot allow such things,” he said, adding that the party will not tolerate lies and will apply the strictest sanctions against Mijič. He further indicated that the party’s executive committee would meet immediately after parliamentary holidays, which end on August 31. During this meeting, he plans to propose the most severe measures against Mijič, though the final decision remains pending. Stevanović expressed disappointment over such occurrences in Slovenian politics, stating that there should be consistent standards for all MPs. He hopes that eventually, similar issues will surface with other members of parliament, leading to broader scrutiny. Despite these threats, Stevanović clarified that the party does not intend to expel Mijič from its ranks, as MPs are directly elected and can only be removed through specific procedures. However, he stressed that if Mijič refuses to resign, the party will pursue legal avenues. If the situation leads to by-elections, Stevanović believes the contest will likely be between two major parties, creating a close race. Other political figures have also weighed in. Nataša Pirc Musar, president of the Republic, criticized Mijič’s behavior, calling him unsuitable for holding public office. She noted that such individuals undermine democratic institutions and should not hold positions of power. Similarly, opposition leaders from the Freedom Party and the Slovenian Democratic Party have called for stricter oversight and transparency, emphasizing the need for accountability in political life. Meanwhile, the issue of Mijič’s business dealings continues to draw attention. Reports indicate that his company, Progros, owes substantial amounts to former employees and the state, with some workers having filed claims totaling around €41,285. The firm has also faced legal actions from the Financial Administration of Slovenia, which has initiated enforcement proceedings due to unpaid debts exceeding €30,000. Additionally, the company has been unable to settle debts with local restaurants, further complicating its financial standing. As the situation unfolds, the political landscape appears to be shifting toward greater scrutiny of individual conduct and transparency. With multiple parties and officials expressing concern over Mijič’s actions, the pressure on him, and potentially others in government, intensifies. Whether this leads to immediate consequences or continued political maneuvering remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the integrity of public office is under renewed examination.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article reports that Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. The faculty confirmed that Mijič was never registered as a graduate, and his diploma thesis is not available in the public database COBISS. Former employees at the construction company Progros, where Mijič worked before entering politics, stated he lacked basic knowledge in civil engineering and had to be constantly guided by colleagues. His father, Milan Mijič, who is the former director and owner of Progros, reportedly informed them of this lack of credentials. The article notes that other politicians, such as former DeSUS MP Ivan Simčič and former SDS MP Marjan Bezjak, have also been exposed for providing false educational information.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a broader concern about political figures misrepresenting their qualifications, which aligns with left-leaning scrutiny of political accountability. It emphasizes the credibility of academic institutions and highlights past cases of similar misconduct by other MPs, a傾
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Mijič claimed to have graduated from FGG but was not listed as such. It also references the confirmation from FGG and former employees.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the facts without personal opinion or bias.
The article reports that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliament representing the Resni.c party, falsely claimed to have a master’s degree in civil engineering from the Ljubljana Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG). Investigations by the FGG revealed that there is no record of him graduating from the university. Additionally, his official curriculum vitae lists only professional training at companies like Penetron Hellas and FDT Technologies Germany, none of which are academic institutions. Former employees at his company Progros claim he lacked basic construction knowledge and often required guidance on projects. The article also notes that Mijič continued to assert his credentials publicly after being elected, despite evidence contradicting this. It further mentions that his father, Miladin Mijič, previously owned and directed Progros.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate deception by a politician, emphasizing the potential implications for public trust in governance. While it presents factual findings from the FGG and employee testimonies, the tone leans toward criticizing Mijič's credibility and integrity, aligning more傾
Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source, confirming that Mijič did not graduate from FGG and that he listed non-academic institutions in his CV. It provides additional details from the university confirmation, which matches the primary source. No contradictions or unsupported claims are pres
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone but uses strong language like 'lagal' (lied) and emphasizes the falsehood, which may lean towards criticism. However, it avoids taking an overtly partisan stance.
VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 857 days ago
The article reports that members of the Slovenian political party Levica have condemned MP Boris Mijič for lying about his educational background. The university in Ljubljana confirmed that Mijič is not a graduate of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, despite claiming otherwise in public appearances. Levica members argue that this is another instance of Mijič misleading the public and suggest that he should resign from his position as a member of the National Assembly. They also criticize the leadership of the National Assembly, particularly its president Zoran Stevanović, for failing to uphold parliamentary standards and for supporting Mijič despite repeated scandals. The article notes that Stevanović’s office has declined to comment, and neither the party nor the assembly has responded to requests for comment.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a violation of public trust by Mijič, emphasizing his dishonesty and the need for accountability. It criticizes the political establishment for enabling such behavior and portrays the opposition (Levica) as upholding democratic values against corruption. The tone is谴责
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the primary source document's claim that Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have a degree from FGG, which was confirmed by the university. It also mentions the political response and the lack of response from Mijič, aligning with the primary source. The article does not ad
Why objectivity (85): The tone is critical of Mijič and his party, Levica, but remains focused on the facts. There is some editorializing in the form of quotes from the party, which could be seen as biased, though it doesn't overtly take sides.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 858 days ago
The article reports that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliament and owner of construction firm Progros, may be misrepresenting his educational background. According to information from the National Election Commission (DVK), Mijič claims to hold a diploma in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty has stated that Mijič was never enrolled as a graduate student there, and his thesis is not available in the publicly accessible COBISS system. The portal Necenzurirano has raised these concerns, and both the portal and MMC RTV Slovenia have asked Mijič for clarification on where and when he obtained his degree, but he has not responded.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a potential misrepresentation by a politician, which carries a critical tone toward Mijič's credibility. While the reporting remains factual, the emphasis on questioning his qualifications suggests a left-leaning perspective, particularly in highlighting the integrity
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source’s findings regarding Mijič’s false claims about his education. It includes direct quotes from the university and confirms that no degree was awarded. It also references the broader pattern of politicians lying about their qualifications, which is su
Why objectivity (85): While the article presents the facts clearly, it frames the issue in a way that highlights Mijič’s dishonesty, which could be interpreted as slightly biased. However, it remains objective in its reporting.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 656 days ago
The president of the Resnica party, Zoran Stevanović, has announced he will propose the strictest measures against MP Boris Mijič following new revelations about his official biography. The controversy stems from claims that Mijič stated he graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, but the faculty confirmed this information is false. The Resnica party explained they first learned of the discrepancy when they were informed that Mijič had not formally completed the degree he claimed during his candidacy. They emphasized that educational qualifications are not a legal requirement for holding a parliamentary position, so such data was not verified when preparing candidate lists.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, without evident bias toward either side. It reports on the allegations against Mijič, the response from the university, and the explanation provided by the Resnica party. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Mijič’s false educational claims and the university’s confirmation of this. It also explains the party’s position on the matter, which is consistent with other sources.
Why objectivity (65): The tone is slightly biased in favor of the party’s stance, particularly in emphasizing the importance of truth-telling within the political sphere.
Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 757 days ago
The Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijić from the Resni.ca party has been accused of falsifying his educational credentials. Despite claiming to be a graduate engineer in civil engineering, he is not listed as a graduate at the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. The portal Necenzurirano verified this by contacting the faculty directly, which confirmed that Mijić is not registered as a graduate and his thesis cannot be found in the publicly accessible COBISS system. Doubts about his qualifications arose during his time working at the construction company Progros, where former employees claimed he lacked basic knowledge in civil engineering and required assistance from colleagues. The Left political party has responded by calling this another instance of misleading the public and argues that Mijić is unfit to hold the position of a parliamentary representative. They demand his removal from office and expect a parliamentary committee meeting to address the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate misrepresentation by Mijić, emphasizing the implications for public trust and institutional integrity. It highlights the Left's concern over the credibility of elected representatives and calls for accountability, aligning with left-leaning values of anti
Why factuality (90): This article mirrors the content of others, confirming that Mijič was not officially recognized as a graduate by the faculty. It also references the media report and the lack of documentation in public systems like COBISS.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, presenting facts without strong emotional language. However, it emphasizes the seriousness of the issue, which may lean slightly towards criticism.
The article reports that MP Boris Mijič, owner of the failing construction company Progros, which owes tens of thousands of euros to employees and the state, has lied about his education. Before the election, Mijič claimed to have a degree in civil engineering. However, the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana confirmed he was never enrolled there as a graduate. Mijič did not mention any other higher education institutions in Slovenia or abroad in his biography. Former employees of Progros stated that Mijič lacked basic knowledge of civil engineering during his time working at the company and had to be trained by colleagues. They also said Mijič’s father, Milan Mijič, previously director of Progros, mentioned this issue multiple times.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents information suggesting that a politician has lied about their qualifications, which is typically viewed as a negative aspect in politics. The tone and content imply criticism toward Mijič, focusing on his dishonesty and lack of competence, aligning more with left-leaning values,
Why factuality (90): The article confirms the primary source’s claims, including the lack of documentation and the faculty’s response. It also includes statements from former employees, adding depth to the allegations.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is factual but carries a critical undertone, suggesting possible negligence or dishonesty, which introduces a mild bias.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
Stevanović, vodja stranke Resnica, je v izjavi za medije poudaril, da bo stranka najstrožje ukrepljala proti poslancu Mijiču, če je ta zavajal javnost glede svoje izobrazbe. Stevanović je poudaril, da stranka ne sprejema laži in da bodo vsake laži obsodili, kot so naredili ob primeru leve. Po njegovih besedah ni dvojnih meril glede poslancev in upa, da bodo podobne zadeve odkriti tudi pri drugih poslancih. Portal Necenzurirano je razkril Mijičevo zavajanje, vendar ni problematiziral dejstva, da Mijič nima visokošolske izobrazbe, temveč da je zavajal javnost. Stevanović je poudaril, da ne vidi razloga za razglashanje o izobrazbi poslancev, saj ni pogoj za kandidaturo. Opozicija pa je v preteklih tednih večkrat pozivala Mijiča k odstopu.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a statement from Stevanović, leader of the 'Resnica' party, regarding potential disciplinary actions against MP Mijič if he misled the public about his education. The framing is neutral, presenting both Stevanović's claims and the context provided by the portal Necenzurirano. No
Why factuality (90): The article corroborates the primary source by stating that Mijič was not registered as a graduate at the Faculty of Civil Engineering. It also includes statements from former employees who claim he lacked basic knowledge in the field, supporting the allegations.
Why objectivity (70): While the article is factual, it has a somewhat critical tone towards Mijič, suggesting possible negligence or incompetence, which introduces a subtle bias.
ReporterIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
Stevanović, leader of the Slovenian political party 'Resnica,' announced plans to address the issue of MP Miha Mijič after parliamentary recess, which ends on August 31. According to Stevanović, he recently learned of Mijič's actual educational background, which contradicts previous claims made by Mijič. Stevanović criticized Mijič for misleading both the public and his own party, stating that such behavior would not be tolerated within 'Resnica.' He emphasized that the party would take strict measures against Mijič if confirmed, though the final decision would rest with the party's leadership. Stevanović expressed disappointment over the situation but noted that having only secondary education does not disqualify someone from being an MP, nor does it justify spreading misinformation about it. He acknowledged the role of the portal 'Necenzurirano' in exposing Mijič's alleged deception but stressed that all politicians who lie should be held accountable. Regarding potential calls for Mijič to resign, Stevanović stated this was not within his authority since MPs are directly elected.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation as a clear case of dishonesty by Mijič, using strong language like 'misleading the public,' 'strict measures,' and 'will not tolerate.' The emphasis on holding politicians accountable for lies aligns with a right-leaning perspective, particularly in the context of a党
Why factuality (90): This article repeats the core findings of the primary source, including the lack of documentation and the faculty’s confirmation. It also includes quotes from former employees, reinforcing the credibility of the claims.
Why objectivity (70): The article is factual but has a critical tone towards Mijič, implying potential negligence or dishonesty, which introduces a subtle bias.
Siol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 90Objective 707 days ago
The Slovenian opposition party Levica has called for MP Boris Mijič to resign again after the portal Necenzurirano reported that he misrepresented his educational background. Mijič previously claimed to be a civil engineering graduate, but the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana clarified that he was not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis is not publicly available. Former employees from the construction company Progros, which Mijič represented before entering politics, also pointed out discrepancies in his education. Levica criticized both Mijič and party leader Zoran Stevanović, accusing them of undermining parliamentary integrity by defending Mijič despite evidence of misconduct. The party claims that Resni.că, which supports Mijič, behaves like a political puppet of the ruling SDS coalition, prioritizing votes over accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of political accountability, criticizing the governing coalition and supporting party for shielding Mijič despite evidence of misrepresentation and financial misconduct. The language emphasizes the need for ethical governance and criticizes the current power
Why factuality (90): The article confirms the primary source’s claims about Mijič’s lack of official graduation and includes quotes from the faculty. It also highlights the internal party response, maintaining alignment with the original report.
Why objectivity (70): The article is factual but carries a tone of disappointment and criticism towards the party for not addressing the issue sooner, introducing a mild bias.
ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago
The article discusses comments made by the President of the National Assembly, Alenka Pirc Musar, regarding the actions of MP Boris Mijič from the Resnica party. She criticized his behavior as unacceptable and stated that individuals acting in such a manner should not hold positions in the 'temple of democracy.' The controversy stems from Mijič's claim before the election that he was a graduate engineer, which contradicts information later provided in his biography on the National Assembly website, where he listed the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty confirmed that Mijič is not registered as a graduate there. This discrepancy has led to accusations of misleading the public about his education, prompting calls for disciplinary action within his party. In addition, Pirc Musar emphasized the need for broader political cooperation on key issues like energy self-sufficiency, electoral system reforms, constitutional changes, regional development, demographic challenges, youth care, economic growth, climate change adaptation, and improving political dialogue. She also condemned efforts to obstruct parliamentary democracy by hind
Bias read (Center): The article presents the views of the National Assembly president and includes statements from opposition parties, providing a balanced perspective on the issue. It does not exhibit clear bias toward any particular side but rather reports on the situation and reactions.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the primary source's claims about Mijič's false educational credentials and the planned disciplinary measures by the party leadership. It includes direct quotes from the party leader and maintains alignment with the primary source.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is firm but professional, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue without resorting to emotional language. It presents the party's position without introducing personal bias or subjective commentary.
The article reports that Zoran Stevanović, President of the National Assembly and leader of the Resni.ca party, has announced plans to propose the strictest disciplinary measures against MP Boris Mijič, including potential expulsion from the party. This follows an investigation by Necenzurirano.si revealing that Mijič lied about his educational background before entering politics, claiming he graduated in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy in Ljubljana, which the faculty denies. Despite this, Mijič continued to present himself as a construction expert publicly. Stevanović stated that the party would take severe action against Mijič if confirmed that he misled both the public and the party. Mijič faces increasing pressure, but the party appears to be delaying formal action until autumn. The article also highlights multiple controversies involving Mijič’s business, Progros, including blocked bank accounts, unpaid debts, legal issues related to employment practices, and past criminal charges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about disciplinary actions within a political party and allegations of misconduct by an MP. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains focused on reported facts and quotes from involved parties, and
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the primary source document's claim that Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have a diploma from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. It cites the university’s confirmation that he was not listed as a graduate. However, it does not me
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards criticism of Mijič and his political party, particularly highlighting the consequences of his actions. While it presents facts objectively, there is an underlying implication that the party is compromised by such behavior, which introduces some bias.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
The article reports on allegations against Slovenian parliamentarian Boris Mijič regarding false information in his official biography, specifically claiming he graduated from Ljubljana Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, which the institution has denied. Zoran Stevanović, leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SD), stated he was first informed of this discrepancy today and emphasized that if Mijič misled the public, it constitutes a betrayal of the party. He warned of strict measures against such behavior and expects the party’s council to address the issue after parliamentary holidays. Stevanović called for Mijič’s expulsion from the party. Other political figures, including Robert Golob and Matjaž Han, criticized Mijič’s actions, linking them to broader issues within the current government, which they claim is based on lies. The situation highlights concerns over transparency and accountability in Slovenian politics.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Mijič's alleged dishonesty as a significant breach of trust, emphasizing the need for stricter accountability. It portrays the political leaders' reactions as urgent and severe, suggesting a left-leaning perspective that prioritizes integrity and public duty
Why factuality (85): Article accurately reports on the claim that Boris Mijič falsely stated his educational background, citing the primary source document from Necenzurirano. It includes quotes from the faculty confirming he was not a graduate, aligning with the primary source. However, it does not directly quote the p
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the issue with some emotional language, such as 'zavajal' and 'škodi ugledu', suggesting a negative stance towards Mijič. The tone leans toward criticism of the politician rather than presenting facts neutrally.
DomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The article discusses allegations against Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič regarding his educational background. It claims that he falsely stated he was a graduate engineer, but records show he is not registered as a diploma holder at the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG). Additionally, former employees of his company Progros allege he lacks basic construction knowledge and did not complete necessary tasks, requiring others to step in. The opposition party Levica has called for Mijič to resign due to these accusations, arguing they damage the credibility of the National Assembly. Party leader Zoran Stevanović defends Mijič and claims he will repay debts to workers, though Mijič has not responded to inquiries. There is speculation that Mijič may not resign before October 10th, as doing so earlier could trigger replacement elections where Resnica might lose their parliamentary seat.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a significant breach of trust by Mijič, emphasizing the potential harm to the National Assembly’s reputation. It highlights criticism from the opposition party Levica, which is generally aligned with leftist values, and portrays Mijič as unqualified and dishonest. The
Why factuality (85): This article corroborates the claims made in the primary source, including the lack of diploma from FGG and the denial by the faculty. It also mentions the financial issues with Mijič’s company, which aligns with the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): Similar to the first article, this piece uses emotionally charged language like 'naglavnih grehov' and 'še eno zavajanje', indicating a biased perspective against Mijič. The focus is on condemning his actions rather than providing an objective analysis.
DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The Slovenian Left Party has called for the resignation of Boris Mijič, a member of the Resni.ca party, over alleged misrepresentation regarding his educational background. Mijič initially claimed to be a graduate engineer but was later found not to be officially enrolled at the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy in Ljubljana, nor does his thesis appear in the public database COBISS. The Left Party argues this is another instance of misleading the public and undermines the credibility of the National Assembly. They criticize Resni.ca for defending Mijič despite revelations and for shifting blame onto the media rather than taking political responsibility. However, the Left’s push for Mijič’s removal is primarily driven by legal considerations: if he resigns within six months of being elected, a by-election would occur across the entire 8th electoral district, including Gornji Radgona, where Mijič ran. This could potentially weaken Resni.ca’s position, as they were the weakest in that district, while the ruling coalition parties like SDS are expected to gain strength.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation through the lens of the Left Party, emphasizing their criticism of Mijič and Resni.ca, portraying them as untrustworthy and politically irresponsible. It highlights the Left’s argument that Mijič’s actions damage the institution of the National Assembly and suggests杜
Why factuality (85): The article confirms the allegations from the primary source regarding Mijič’s false claims about his education, including the response from the faculty and the absence of his thesis in COBISS. It also references the internal staff concerns at Progros.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is critical of Mijič and his party, using phrases like 'politična podizvajalko' and 'škodi ugledu'. This suggests a partisan bias rather than a neutral report.
Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The article reports on a new scandal involving Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič, who was found to have lied about his educational background. According to the portal Necenzurirano, Mijič claimed to have graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, as stated in his official biography. However, the university has confirmed that he was never a graduate of their program. The article highlights concerns over Mijič’s credibility and integrity, noting that this is another instance of him misleading the public. Left-wing parties are calling for his removal from office, arguing that such behavior disqualifies him from holding public office. The article also mentions ongoing efforts by Mijič’s party, Resnica, to defend him despite these revelations.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a significant breach of trust by Mijič, emphasizing his dishonesty and the broader implications for his party, Resnica. It portrays the left-wing parties as advocating for accountability and transparency, while criticizing Resnica for defending Mijič despite evidence.
Why factuality (85): This article repeats the core facts from the primary source, including the faculty’s confirmation that Mijič did not graduate and the lack of evidence for his thesis. It also mentions the internal staff concerns at Progros.
Why objectivity (70): The language used is emotive, particularly when discussing the impact on public trust ('dodatno škodi ugledu'), which indicates a leaning towards criticizing Mijič rather than presenting a balanced view.
ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The article discusses allegations against MP Boris Mijič regarding his educational background and financial responsibilities. Mijič previously claimed to have graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana but was not officially registered as a graduate there, and his thesis is not publicly available. The Left Party criticized these discrepancies, stating they undermine Mijič's credibility as a parliament member and damage the reputation of the National Assembly. They also accused the Resnica party of shielding Mijič despite revelations about his conduct, suggesting the party acts as a political ally to the ruling coalition. Mijič's former employer, Progros, faced financial difficulties due to unpaid obligations, which were investigated by labor inspectors and the Anti-Corruption Commission. Mijič has promised to settle debts by year-end but remains the owner of the company.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents strong criticism from the Left Party toward MP Boris Mijič and his party, Resnica, accusing them of misleading the public and failing to uphold accountability. The framing emphasizes the negative implications of Mijič's actions on the National Assembly's reputation and portrays杜
Why factuality (85): The article aligns with the primary source, detailing the faculty’s response and the internal staff concerns. It also mentions the financial issues with Mijič’s company, supporting the factual claims.
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains critical, especially when discussing the implications of Mijič’s actions on public trust. Phrases like 'škodi ugledu' suggest a biased perspective.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The article reports that MP Boris Mijič may have lied about his educational background. According to the portal Necenzurirano, Mijič claimed in his biography to hold a seventh-level education and a diploma in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG) at the University of Ljubljana. However, the FGG stated that Mijič was never enrolled as a graduate and that his thesis could not be found in the publicly accessible COBISS system. Former employees at Progros, where Mijič served as a legal representative for three years, expressed skepticism about his qualifications, noting he had difficulty understanding basic construction principles and required colleagues to handle project details and work in his place. His father, Miladin Mijič, reportedly told workers that Boris lacked a diploma. The Left Party has called on Mijič to resign, but neither the party nor Mijič himself have commented on the allegations. Additionally, Mijič faces accusations of misappropriating wages, forging signatures on employee resignations, and owing significant debts to the Slovenian Financial Administration (Furs). The Anti-Corruption Commission is investigating his involvement in
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual claims about Mijič’s alleged false credentials without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It cites multiple sources—FGG, former employees, and his father—to challenge his educational background, but does not frame these allegations as part of a broader的政治
Why factuality (85): This article confirms the primary source’s claims about Mijič’s false educational credentials, including the faculty’s response and the absence of his thesis. It also references the internal staff concerns at Progros.
Why objectivity (70): The language is again emotive, focusing on the consequences of Mijič’s actions rather than presenting a neutral account. The tone is clearly critical of him and his party.
VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Borisa Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliamentary party Resnica, is facing new allegations regarding his educational background. According to the website Necenzurirano, Mijič claimed during the election campaign that he holds a degree in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, after being elected as a parliamentarian, Mijič listed this same institution as his educational background on the National Assembly’s website. The faculty confirmed that Mijič was never enrolled as a graduate there. Additionally, former employees of the construction firm Progros, where Mijič worked before entering politics, stated that he lacked basic knowledge of construction work and had to be constantly informed by colleagues while working on projects. Mijič has been involved in legal disputes over debts owed to employees and the state due to financial difficulties faced by Progros, which led to his resignation as director in June. He has promised to pay off all debts by the end of the year.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights multiple controversies involving a politician, including false claims about education and financial misconduct. The framing emphasizes the discrepancies between Mijič's public claims and verified facts, suggesting a critical stance toward his actions and credibility. The focus
Why factuality (85): The article supports the primary source by quoting the faculty’s response and mentioning the internal staff concerns. It also discusses the financial issues with Mijič’s company, reinforcing the factual claims.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is consistently critical, emphasizing the negative impact of Mijič’s actions on public trust. Emotional language is used to highlight the seriousness of the situation.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
The article reports that Boris Mijič, a member of the Respublica Party (Resnica), has allegedly lied about his educational background. According to the portal Necenzurirano, Mijič claimed to have graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, but the faculty has no record of him completing his studies or receiving a diploma. The Left (Levica) opposition party has once again called for Mijič to resign, criticizing this as another instance of misleading the public. They argue that this undermines his credibility as a representative in the National Assembly. The article also questions whether Zoran Stevanović, leader of Resnica, will now assist Mijič in passing additional exams after having previously paid off Mijič’s former employees.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate misrepresentation by Mijič, which is presented as a serious ethical failure undermining his role as a politician. The Left party is directly quoted as condemning the actions and calling for resignation, indicating a clear alignment with their perspective.
Why factuality (85): This article aligns with the primary source, confirming that Mijič did not graduate from FGG and that his thesis is missing from COBISS. It also mentions the internal staff concerns at Progros.
Why objectivity (70): The language is emotive, particularly when discussing the implications of Mijič’s actions. The tone is critical, suggesting a bias against him and his party.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
