Pirc Musar Sharp: Such a man should not work in the U.S.
The article discusses comments made by the President of the National Assembly, Alenka Pirc Musar, regarding the actions of MP Boris Mijič from the Resnica party. She criticized his behavior as unacceptable and stated that individuals acting in such a manner should not hold positions in the 'temple of democracy.' The controversy stems from Mijič's claim before the election that he was a graduate engineer, which contradicts information later provided in his biography on the National Assembly website, where he listed the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty confirmed that Mijič is not registered as a graduate there. This discrepancy has led to accusations of misleading the public about his education, prompting calls for disciplinary action within his party. In addition, Pirc Musar emphasized the need for broader political cooperation on key issues like energy self-sufficiency, electoral system reforms, constitutional changes, regional development, demographic challenges, youth care, economic growth, climate change adaptation, and improving political dialogue. She also condemned efforts to obstruct parliamentary democracy by hind
Resnica's President Threatens Harsh Measures Against MP Mijič Over Fraud Allegations On July 15, 2026, Zoran Stevanović, president of the political party Resnica, announced he would propose the strictest possible measures against MP Boris Mijič following revelations that the politician had falsely claimed to hold a university degree. The allegations emerged after media reports uncovered discrepancies in Mijič’s official biography, which stated he had graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty confirmed that Mijič was never officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis could not be found in public databases. Stevanović emphasized that the false claims were not just personal dishonesty but a betrayal of the party’s core values. He described Resnica as a party committed to transparency and rejecting lies, stating that such actions undermined public trust in the institution. “If someone has lied to the public, they have also lied to us,” he said, adding that the party would not tolerate such behavior. He warned that the consequences would be severe, though he did not specify whether expulsion from the party was among them. The controversy over Mijič’s credentials came amid broader concerns about his financial dealings and alleged misconduct. Reports revealed that Mijič’s company, Progros, owed thousands of euros in unpaid taxes and wages to employees, while also failing to pay debts to local restaurants that supplied meals for workers during construction projects. Additionally, internal audits of Progros showed irregularities in payroll records, including missing signatures on employment documents and delayed payments to staff. These issues led to legal action, with some employees reporting that their contracts were signed by unknown parties, raising questions about the legitimacy of Mijič’s management practices. Stevanović’s announcement followed weeks of growing pressure from opposition parties and civil society groups demanding accountability. On July 15, several members of the opposition, including representatives from the Left Party, expressed concern over the lack of transparency surrounding Mijič’s qualifications and business activities. Asta Vrečko, coordinator of the Left Party, criticized the party for allegedly avoiding taking decisive action against Mijič, suggesting that the decision to remain silent might stem from fears of losing support. She called Mijič one of the most fraudulent MPs in Slovenia’s 35-year history, citing his repeated violations of labor rights and financial obligations. Meanwhile, other political figures, including former Prime Minister Robert Golob and SD leader Matjaž Han, echoed similar sentiments. Golob accused Mijič of undermining democratic principles by misleading the public and failing to uphold ethical standards. Han pointed to October 10th as a critical date, noting that after six months in office, any MP who resigns before this deadline can be replaced by another candidate from the same party, potentially triggering early elections. Stevanović himself acknowledged the complexity of the situation, acknowledging that not all MPs with secondary education are inherently problematic. He argued that the issue was not the level of education itself but the deliberate deception involved in presenting false credentials. “There is nothing wrong with having a secondary education,” he said, “but lying about it is unacceptable.” He also defended the party’s stance, stating that it would not tolerate fraud in its ranks, even if it meant taking harsh disciplinary actions. Despite these statements, the debate over Mijič’s conduct continues to intensify. Some within the opposition argue that the proposed measures, while firm, are insufficient given the scale of alleged wrongdoing. Others suggest that the case highlights deeper systemic flaws in Slovenian politics, particularly regarding the lack of oversight and transparency in parliamentary conduct. As the parliament prepares for its summer recess, the outcome of the upcoming party meeting will likely determine the extent of action taken against Mijič, setting a precedent for how future cases of corruption or deceit will be handled.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article reports that Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. The faculty confirmed that Mijič was never registered as a graduate, and his diploma thesis is not available in the public database COBISS. Former employees at the construction company Progros, where Mijič worked before entering politics, stated he lacked basic knowledge in civil engineering and had to be constantly guided by colleagues. His father, Milan Mijič, who is the former director and owner of Progros, reportedly informed them of this lack of credentials. The article notes that other politicians, such as former DeSUS MP Ivan Simčič and former SDS MP Marjan Bezjak, have also been exposed for providing false educational information.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a broader concern about political figures misrepresenting their qualifications, which aligns with left-leaning scrutiny of political accountability. It emphasizes the credibility of academic institutions and highlights past cases of similar misconduct by other MPs, a傾
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that Mijič claimed to have graduated from FGG but was not listed as such. It also references the confirmation from FGG and former employees.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the facts without personal opinion or bias.
The article reports that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliament representing the Resni.c party, falsely claimed to have a master’s degree in civil engineering from the Ljubljana Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG). Investigations by the FGG revealed that there is no record of him graduating from the university. Additionally, his official curriculum vitae lists only professional training at companies like Penetron Hellas and FDT Technologies Germany, none of which are academic institutions. Former employees at his company Progros claim he lacked basic construction knowledge and often required guidance on projects. The article also notes that Mijič continued to assert his credentials publicly after being elected, despite evidence contradicting this. It further mentions that his father, Miladin Mijič, previously owned and directed Progros.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate deception by a politician, emphasizing the potential implications for public trust in governance. While it presents factual findings from the FGG and employee testimonies, the tone leans toward criticizing Mijič's credibility and integrity, aligning more傾
Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source, confirming that Mijič did not graduate from FGG and that he listed non-academic institutions in his CV. It provides additional details from the university confirmation, which matches the primary source. No contradictions or unsupported claims are pres
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone but uses strong language like 'lagal' (lied) and emphasizes the falsehood, which may lean towards criticism. However, it avoids taking an overtly partisan stance.
VečerIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 856 days ago
The article reports that members of the Slovenian political party Levica have condemned MP Boris Mijič for lying about his educational background. The university in Ljubljana confirmed that Mijič is not a graduate of the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, despite claiming otherwise in public appearances. Levica members argue that this is another instance of Mijič misleading the public and suggest that he should resign from his position as a member of the National Assembly. They also criticize the leadership of the National Assembly, particularly its president Zoran Stevanović, for failing to uphold parliamentary standards and for supporting Mijič despite repeated scandals. The article notes that Stevanović’s office has declined to comment, and neither the party nor the assembly has responded to requests for comment.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a violation of public trust by Mijič, emphasizing his dishonesty and the need for accountability. It criticizes the political establishment for enabling such behavior and portrays the opposition (Levica) as upholding democratic values against corruption. The tone is谴责
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the primary source document's claim that Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have a degree from FGG, which was confirmed by the university. It also mentions the political response and the lack of response from Mijič, aligning with the primary source. The article does not ad
Why objectivity (85): The tone is critical of Mijič and his party, Levica, but remains focused on the facts. There is some editorializing in the form of quotes from the party, which could be seen as biased, though it doesn't overtly take sides.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 857 days ago
The article reports that Boris Mijič, a member of the Slovenian parliament and owner of construction firm Progros, may be misrepresenting his educational background. According to information from the National Election Commission (DVK), Mijič claims to hold a diploma in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty has stated that Mijič was never enrolled as a graduate student there, and his thesis is not available in the publicly accessible COBISS system. The portal Necenzurirano has raised these concerns, and both the portal and MMC RTV Slovenia have asked Mijič for clarification on where and when he obtained his degree, but he has not responded.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a potential misrepresentation by a politician, which carries a critical tone toward Mijič's credibility. While the reporting remains factual, the emphasis on questioning his qualifications suggests a left-leaning perspective, particularly in highlighting the integrity
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source’s findings regarding Mijič’s false claims about his education. It includes direct quotes from the university and confirms that no degree was awarded. It also references the broader pattern of politicians lying about their qualifications, which is su
Why objectivity (85): While the article presents the facts clearly, it frames the issue in a way that highlights Mijič’s dishonesty, which could be interpreted as slightly biased. However, it remains objective in its reporting.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 655 days ago
The president of the Resnica party, Zoran Stevanović, has announced he will propose the strictest measures against MP Boris Mijič following new revelations about his official biography. The controversy stems from claims that Mijič stated he graduated from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, but the faculty confirmed this information is false. The Resnica party explained they first learned of the discrepancy when they were informed that Mijič had not formally completed the degree he claimed during his candidacy. They emphasized that educational qualifications are not a legal requirement for holding a parliamentary position, so such data was not verified when preparing candidate lists.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, without evident bias toward either side. It reports on the allegations against Mijič, the response from the university, and the explanation provided by the Resnica party. There is no overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Mijič’s false educational claims and the university’s confirmation of this. It also explains the party’s position on the matter, which is consistent with other sources.
Why objectivity (65): The tone is slightly biased in favor of the party’s stance, particularly in emphasizing the importance of truth-telling within the political sphere.
The article discusses legal and financial issues involving the company Progros, owned by Slovenian politician Boris Mijič. Thirteen former employees of Progros have filed claims totaling over €41,285 for unpaid wages, refunds, and other payments they are owed. The workers approached the labor advisory organization Delavska svetovalnica, which has hired a detective to assist in recovering the money. However, efforts to locate Mijič’s family members have been unsuccessful, and the situation remains unresolved. Additionally, Progros no longer has any active bank accounts, making it unclear whether the company can fulfill its obligations. The article highlights the prolonged struggle of these workers, some of whom have already passed away, and notes that the total debt includes both net amounts and additional contributions and taxes that the employer would be responsible for.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a legal dispute involving a politician's company and its former employees. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content focuses on documented claims and ongoing legal challenges without apparent slant.
Why factuality (90): The article covers the main points from the primary source, including the verification of Mijič’s educational claims and the lack of response from him. It also touches on the financial issues at Progros, which are mentioned in the primary source. However, it briefly mentions the Delavska svetovalnic
Why objectivity (80): The tone leans toward concern for the workers and the company, which could be seen as slightly sympathetic to the employees rather than remaining strictly neutral. This introduces a minor bias.
Primorske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 752 days ago
The article discusses the ongoing scandal involving Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič from the party Resnica, who continues to face scandals despite public pressure. Coalition parties refuse to comment on the matter, and parliamentary speaker Zoran Stevanović is protecting his colleague, planning to propose Mijič’s expulsion from the party after summer holidays but not pressing him to resign as a parliamentarian. If Mijič resigns before October 10th, early elections would be held in his constituency, potentially affecting Resnica’s parliamentary representation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of political culture, implying that Mijič's behavior reflects systemic issues within the political system. The emphasis on the potential impact on Resnica's parliamentary seats suggests a concern over the integrity of the political process, aligning more
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source, including the confirmation from the faculty and the internal party response. It maintains consistency with the reported facts and adds context about the political implications.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but leans towards criticizing the party for protecting Mijič, which introduces a slight bias.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 756 days ago
The article discusses allegations against Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijič regarding his educational background and financial responsibilities. It states that the parliamentary committee will investigate the matter and review the issue with the party's organs. Mijič claimed during his candidacy that he was a civil engineering graduate, but the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana clarified that he is not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis is not available in the public database. Additionally, former employees at his construction company Progros have raised concerns about his lack of knowledge in the field. The article also mentions that Mijič owes workers and the state tens of thousands of euros, leading to financial difficulties for the company. The labor inspectorate and anti-corruption commission have identified irregularities in the company, and while Mijič has stepped down as director, he remains the owner. Former president of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović has reportedly paid some of the outstanding debts, though the company still owes him money.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about Mijič’s education and financial obligations without overtly criticizing or praising him. It reports on official findings and statements from multiple institutions, including the university and the anti-corruption commission, which suggests a balanced approach.
Why factuality (90): The article aligns perfectly with the primary source, providing detailed confirmation from the faculty and referencing the media report. It includes quotes and contextual information that support the claims made.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but leans towards emphasizing the severity of the situation, which could be interpreted as slightly biased.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 756 days ago
The Slovenian political party Resnica has announced plans to investigate claims that their parliamentary candidate Boris Mijič misrepresented his educational background. According to reports, Mijič claimed to be a civil engineering graduate during his candidacy but later listed the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy (FGG) in his CV without being formally recognized as a graduate. The FGG confirmed he was not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis could not be found in public records. Additionally, former employees at his company Progros have raised concerns about his qualifications. This issue has sparked public interest and calls for Mijič’s resignation due to alleged financial mismanagement and unpaid debts. The party leader Zoran Stevanović has pledged to cover some of these debts, highlighting the controversy surrounding Mijič.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents allegations against Mijič, it does not take a clear partisan stance. It provides both the claims made by critics and the responses from the FGG and the party leadership. The tone remains objective, focusing on factual reporting rather than promoting a specific ideological,
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on Mijič’s alleged false credentials and confirms the faculty’s response. It aligns with the primary source and includes additional context about the party’s stance.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral but leans towards highlighting the seriousness of the issue, which may introduce a slight bias.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 756 days ago
The Slovenian newspaper Dnevnik reports that MP Boris Mijič claimed to be a graduate engineer before parliamentary elections, but this claim has been challenged. The National Election Commission (DVK) and his political party, Resnica, have announced they will investigate the accuracy of these claims. According to the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana, Mijič is not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis is not available in the public database Cobiss. Additionally, former employees at his construction company Progros have raised concerns about his educational background. This controversy comes amid broader scrutiny of Mijič’s financial obligations to his company, which has faced liquidity issues and was investigated by labor inspectors and anti-corruption authorities.
Bias read (Center): While the article highlights potential inaccuracies in Mijič's educational claims, it presents information from multiple sources including the university, former employees, and official investigations. It does not overtly criticize or praise Mijič personally, nor does it frame the issue as a clear '
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on Mijič’s claimed education and confirms through the university that he was not officially graduated. It aligns closely with the primary source and provides direct quotes from the faculty confirming the lack of documentation.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents information objectively, citing sources and quoting officials. However, there is a slight leaning towards highlighting the controversy, which could be seen as slightly biased.
Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 756 days ago
The Slovenian parliament member Boris Mijić from the Resni.ca party has been accused of falsifying his educational credentials. Despite claiming to be a graduate engineer in civil engineering, he is not listed as a graduate at the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. The portal Necenzurirano verified this by contacting the faculty directly, which confirmed that Mijić is not registered as a graduate and his thesis cannot be found in the publicly accessible COBISS system. Doubts about his qualifications arose during his time working at the construction company Progros, where former employees claimed he lacked basic knowledge in civil engineering and required assistance from colleagues. The Left political party has responded by calling this another instance of misleading the public and argues that Mijić is unfit to hold the position of a parliamentary representative. They demand his removal from office and expect a parliamentary committee meeting to address the issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a deliberate misrepresentation by Mijić, emphasizing the implications for public trust and institutional integrity. It highlights the Left's concern over the credibility of elected representatives and calls for accountability, aligning with left-leaning values of anti
Why factuality (90): This article mirrors the content of others, confirming that Mijič was not officially recognized as a graduate by the faculty. It also references the media report and the lack of documentation in public systems like COBISS.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, presenting facts without strong emotional language. However, it emphasizes the seriousness of the issue, which may lean slightly towards criticism.
The article reports that MP Boris Mijič, owner of the failing construction company Progros, which owes tens of thousands of euros to employees and the state, has lied about his education. Before the election, Mijič claimed to have a degree in civil engineering. However, the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana confirmed he was never enrolled there as a graduate. Mijič did not mention any other higher education institutions in Slovenia or abroad in his biography. Former employees of Progros stated that Mijič lacked basic knowledge of civil engineering during his time working at the company and had to be trained by colleagues. They also said Mijič’s father, Milan Mijič, previously director of Progros, mentioned this issue multiple times.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents information suggesting that a politician has lied about their qualifications, which is typically viewed as a negative aspect in politics. The tone and content imply criticism toward Mijič, focusing on his dishonesty and lack of competence, aligning more with left-leaning values,
Why factuality (90): The article confirms the primary source’s claims, including the lack of documentation and the faculty’s response. It also includes statements from former employees, adding depth to the allegations.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is factual but carries a critical undertone, suggesting possible negligence or dishonesty, which introduces a mild bias.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 705 days ago
Stevanović, vodja stranke Resnica, je v izjavi za medije poudaril, da bo stranka najstrožje ukrepljala proti poslancu Mijiču, če je ta zavajal javnost glede svoje izobrazbe. Stevanović je poudaril, da stranka ne sprejema laži in da bodo vsake laži obsodili, kot so naredili ob primeru leve. Po njegovih besedah ni dvojnih meril glede poslancev in upa, da bodo podobne zadeve odkriti tudi pri drugih poslancih. Portal Necenzurirano je razkril Mijičevo zavajanje, vendar ni problematiziral dejstva, da Mijič nima visokošolske izobrazbe, temveč da je zavajal javnost. Stevanović je poudaril, da ne vidi razloga za razglashanje o izobrazbi poslancev, saj ni pogoj za kandidaturo. Opozicija pa je v preteklih tednih večkrat pozivala Mijiča k odstopu.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a statement from Stevanović, leader of the 'Resnica' party, regarding potential disciplinary actions against MP Mijič if he misled the public about his education. The framing is neutral, presenting both Stevanović's claims and the context provided by the portal Necenzurirano. No
Why factuality (90): The article corroborates the primary source by stating that Mijič was not registered as a graduate at the Faculty of Civil Engineering. It also includes statements from former employees who claim he lacked basic knowledge in the field, supporting the allegations.
Why objectivity (70): While the article is factual, it has a somewhat critical tone towards Mijič, suggesting possible negligence or incompetence, which introduces a subtle bias.
ReporterIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 705 days ago
Stevanović, leader of the Slovenian political party 'Resnica,' announced plans to address the issue of MP Miha Mijič after parliamentary recess, which ends on August 31. According to Stevanović, he recently learned of Mijič's actual educational background, which contradicts previous claims made by Mijič. Stevanović criticized Mijič for misleading both the public and his own party, stating that such behavior would not be tolerated within 'Resnica.' He emphasized that the party would take strict measures against Mijič if confirmed, though the final decision would rest with the party's leadership. Stevanović expressed disappointment over the situation but noted that having only secondary education does not disqualify someone from being an MP, nor does it justify spreading misinformation about it. He acknowledged the role of the portal 'Necenzurirano' in exposing Mijič's alleged deception but stressed that all politicians who lie should be held accountable. Regarding potential calls for Mijič to resign, Stevanović stated this was not within his authority since MPs are directly elected.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation as a clear case of dishonesty by Mijič, using strong language like 'misleading the public,' 'strict measures,' and 'will not tolerate.' The emphasis on holding politicians accountable for lies aligns with a right-leaning perspective, particularly in the context of a党
Why factuality (90): This article repeats the core findings of the primary source, including the lack of documentation and the faculty’s confirmation. It also includes quotes from former employees, reinforcing the credibility of the claims.
Why objectivity (70): The article is factual but has a critical tone towards Mijič, implying potential negligence or dishonesty, which introduces a subtle bias.
Siol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
The Slovenian opposition party Levica has called for MP Boris Mijič to resign again after the portal Necenzurirano reported that he misrepresented his educational background. Mijič previously claimed to be a civil engineering graduate, but the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana clarified that he was not officially registered as a graduate, and his thesis is not publicly available. Former employees from the construction company Progros, which Mijič represented before entering politics, also pointed out discrepancies in his education. Levica criticized both Mijič and party leader Zoran Stevanović, accusing them of undermining parliamentary integrity by defending Mijič despite evidence of misconduct. The party claims that Resni.că, which supports Mijič, behaves like a political puppet of the ruling SDS coalition, prioritizing votes over accountability.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of political accountability, criticizing the governing coalition and supporting party for shielding Mijič despite evidence of misrepresentation and financial misconduct. The language emphasizes the need for ethical governance and criticizes the current power
Why factuality (90): The article confirms the primary source’s claims about Mijič’s lack of official graduation and includes quotes from the faculty. It also highlights the internal party response, maintaining alignment with the original report.
Why objectivity (70): The article is factual but carries a tone of disappointment and criticism towards the party for not addressing the issue sooner, introducing a mild bias.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
The article discusses the financial disputes between Boris Mijič, a member of parliament for the Slovenian Radical Party, and the owners of a restaurant in Slovenia. Mijič's company, Progros, was involved in providing meals to construction workers over three months at a reduced cost. However, after the first month, Mijič failed to settle four bills totaling over €3,600. The restaurant owners attempted to recover the debt through legal channels, but Mijič closed his company’s accounts, preventing them from accessing funds despite a court order. Mijič now works through his wife’s company, which has shifted focus to construction. His parents, who previously owned Progros, continue to be involved in related businesses, including new companies that may absorb debts from Progros. The article highlights public skepticism towards Mijič’s parliamentary role, noting that many voters are disillusioned with politicians and believe he should resign due to past legal issues.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Mijič's actions and personal connections in a manner that suggests potential conflicts of interest and ethical concerns, particularly highlighting his family's continued involvement in business despite his legal troubles. It emphasizes public distrust in politicians and implies a左
Why factuality (85): This article provides detailed accounts of the workers’ claims against Mijič, including the total debt amount and the legal steps they’ve taken. It supports the primary source by detailing the extent of the financial and ethical violations attributed to Mijič.
Why objectivity (75): The article remains neutral, presenting the workers’ perspectives without taking an explicit stance. It reports the situation based on available evidence and does not introduce subjective commentary.
ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago
The article discusses comments made by the President of the National Assembly, Alenka Pirc Musar, regarding the actions of MP Boris Mijič from the Resnica party. She criticized his behavior as unacceptable and stated that individuals acting in such a manner should not hold positions in the 'temple of democracy.' The controversy stems from Mijič's claim before the election that he was a graduate engineer, which contradicts information later provided in his biography on the National Assembly website, where he listed the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. However, the faculty confirmed that Mijič is not registered as a graduate there. This discrepancy has led to accusations of misleading the public about his education, prompting calls for disciplinary action within his party. In addition, Pirc Musar emphasized the need for broader political cooperation on key issues like energy self-sufficiency, electoral system reforms, constitutional changes, regional development, demographic challenges, youth care, economic growth, climate change adaptation, and improving political dialogue. She also condemned efforts to obstruct parliamentary democracy by hind
Bias read (Center): The article presents the views of the National Assembly president and includes statements from opposition parties, providing a balanced perspective on the issue. It does not exhibit clear bias toward any particular side but rather reports on the situation and reactions.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the primary source's claims about Mijič's false educational credentials and the planned disciplinary measures by the party leadership. It includes direct quotes from the party leader and maintains alignment with the primary source.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is firm but professional, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue without resorting to emotional language. It presents the party's position without introducing personal bias or subjective commentary.
The article reports that Zoran Stevanović, President of the National Assembly and leader of the Resni.ca party, has announced plans to propose the strictest disciplinary measures against MP Boris Mijič, including potential expulsion from the party. This follows an investigation by Necenzurirano.si revealing that Mijič lied about his educational background before entering politics, claiming he graduated in civil engineering from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy in Ljubljana, which the faculty denies. Despite this, Mijič continued to present himself as a construction expert publicly. Stevanović stated that the party would take severe action against Mijič if confirmed that he misled both the public and the party. Mijič faces increasing pressure, but the party appears to be delaying formal action until autumn. The article also highlights multiple controversies involving Mijič’s business, Progros, including blocked bank accounts, unpaid debts, legal issues related to employment practices, and past criminal charges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about disciplinary actions within a political party and allegations of misconduct by an MP. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains focused on reported facts and quotes from involved parties, and
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the primary source document's claim that Boris Mijič falsely claimed to have a diploma from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy at the University of Ljubljana. It cites the university’s confirmation that he was not listed as a graduate. However, it does not me
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards criticism of Mijič and his political party, particularly highlighting the consequences of his actions. While it presents facts objectively, there is an underlying implication that the party is compromised by such behavior, which introduces some bias.
The article reports on findings by the labor inspection regarding violations at Borisa Mijič's company, Progros. Mijič, who previously served as a prosecutor, was found to have withheld vacation pay from employees and failed to report workers to social insurance systems. The inspections, conducted in February and November 2024, revealed systemic issues despite the company's record profits. Despite fines and being added to a blacklist by the Financial Administration, Progros continued operations, leaving employees unpaid. The documents obtained under the law on access to public information show that Mijič's debts to employees and the state exceed tens of thousands of euros.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic abuse of employee rights by a politician (Mijič), highlighting his role as a former prosecutor and his connections to political figures like Zoran Stevanović. It emphasizes the legal and ethical failures of a public figure, using terms like 'systematic' and
Why factuality (85): This article provides detailed reports from the inspection records, confirming Mijič’s company had multiple violations, including non-payment of wages and incorrect documentation. These findings align closely with the primary source and offer concrete evidence supporting the allegations against Miji
Why objectivity (70): The article remains objective by presenting the facts from the inspection records without overtly blaming Mijič. It avoids emotional language and sticks to reporting the documented issues without taking sides.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 705 days ago
The article reports on allegations against Slovenian parliamentarian Boris Mijič regarding false information in his official biography, specifically claiming he graduated from Ljubljana Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, which the institution has denied. Zoran Stevanović, leader of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SD), stated he was first informed of this discrepancy today and emphasized that if Mijič misled the public, it constitutes a betrayal of the party. He warned of strict measures against such behavior and expects the party’s council to address the issue after parliamentary holidays. Stevanović called for Mijič’s expulsion from the party. Other political figures, including Robert Golob and Matjaž Han, criticized Mijič’s actions, linking them to broader issues within the current government, which they claim is based on lies. The situation highlights concerns over transparency and accountability in Slovenian politics.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Mijič's alleged dishonesty as a significant breach of trust, emphasizing the need for stricter accountability. It portrays the political leaders' reactions as urgent and severe, suggesting a left-leaning perspective that prioritizes integrity and public duty
Why factuality (85): Article accurately reports on the claim that Boris Mijič falsely stated his educational background, citing the primary source document from Necenzurirano. It includes quotes from the faculty confirming he was not a graduate, aligning with the primary source. However, it does not directly quote the p
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the issue with some emotional language, such as 'zavajal' and 'škodi ugledu', suggesting a negative stance towards Mijič. The tone leans toward criticism of the politician rather than presenting facts neutrally.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
