The ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government in Taiwan faces growing criticism from opposition leaders who accuse it of neglecting the island's longstanding territorial claims in the South China Sea. Opposition party members, particularly representatives from the Kuomintang (KMT), argue that Taiwan's administration has failed to take a firm stance against external powers challenging its maritime boundaries. The controversy stems from the Philippines' recent actions regarding the Scarborough Shoal, known locally as Huangyan Island in China and Minzhu Reef in Taiwan. On Sunday, KMT culture and communications committee director Chen I-hsin criticized the government for its lackluster response to the Philippines’ attempt to define territorial sea baselines around the shoal. The dispute over Scarborough Shoal has intensified after the Philippines submitted its official nautical chart to the United Nations, asserting its claims to the area. The shoal, which lies approximately 200 kilometers northeast of the Philippine capital, is a point of contention among China, Taiwan, and the Philippines. Each side refers to the feature by different names, Scarborough Shoal, Huangyan Island, and Minzhu Reef, and each maintains exclusive sovereignty over the site. The Philippines’ submission to the UN marks a formal step in its effort to delineate its maritime boundaries, a move that has drawn sharp rebukes from Chinese officials and raised concerns within Taiwan’s political circles. Meanwhile, the Philippines continues to pursue broader maritime ambitions in the South China Sea, focusing on seabed rights under international law. On July 28, Manila officially presented its partial submission to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, detailing its claims to an extended continental shelf in waters it considers its territory. This submission, according to the Department of Foreign Affairs, underscores the Philippines’ commitment to upholding the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Article 76 of UNCLOS allows coastal nations to extend their jurisdiction over seabed and subsoil resources beyond the traditional 200-nautical-mile limit, though the process requires rigorous scientific validation. Analysts suggest that the Philippines’ push for seabed rights could complicate ongoing negotiations aimed at establishing a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. These discussions, led by ASEAN nations, aim to promote stability and prevent conflict in one of the world’s most contentious regions. However, the Philippines’ focus on legal and technical aspects of maritime claims may delay progress toward a comprehensive agreement. The DFA emphasized that the submission aligns with the Philippines’ goal of securing peace and prosperity through adherence to international law, highlighting the strategic importance of the issue for national security and economic interests. Separately, the Philippines is exploring new defense strategies, drawing inspiration from Ukraine’s successful use of drones in countering Russian advances. During a high-level meeting in Kyiv on July 24, Philippine officials discussed potential collaboration with Ukraine to enhance maritime surveillance and coastguard operations. While some experts view this partnership as a promising development, others caution that adapting Ukraine’s tactics to the complex environment of the South China Sea may require careful consideration. The proposed “Drone Deal” aims to deepen bilateral defense ties, potentially providing the Philippines with advanced technologies to bolster its presence in the region. As tensions continue to mount in the South China Sea, the Philippines’ multifaceted approach, ranging from territorial disputes to seabed rights and technological alliances, reflects its determination to assert influence in the region. Meanwhile, Taiwan’s leadership faces mounting pressure to clarify its position on maritime issues, especially as external actors increasingly challenge its claims. The coming months will likely witness heightened diplomatic activity, as all parties seek to navigate the intricate web of legal, geopolitical, and strategic considerations shaping the future of the South China Sea.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
HK
