The article discusses the ongoing impeachment process against South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, highlighting procedural delays caused by internal debates within the ANC-led parliamentary committee. Opposition parties accuse the ANC of using delay tactics to stall progress, particularly regarding the appointment of evidence leaders and finalizing terms of reference. Key issues include whether the Section 89 independent panel report, which found Ramaphosa had a case to answer over Phala Phala, should be presented to MPs. Despite parliamentary legal advice indicating the report belongs to Parliament, ANC members argue for additional scrutiny. The process has been further complicated by calls for the panel's chairperson to brief MPs, similar to past impeachments. While a vote temporarily resolved some disputes, the focus remains on prolonging the process, with key legal deadlines approaching. The article suggests these delays serve to protect Ramaphosa, mirroring past strategies used during the impeachment of former President Jacob Zuma.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the ANC's actions as attempts to 'protect' President Ramaphosa through procedural delays and legalistic arguments, implying a lack of genuine commitment to accountability. It portrays the opposition as being hindered by ANC obstructionism, suggesting a left-leaning perspective on




![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2F27july2026sona111.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)

