ON
← Back to feed
‘Paul O’Sullivan was a double agent’
ZA🏛️ PoliticsConservative3 days ago

‘Paul O’Sullivan was a double agent’

Former forensic examiner Paul O'Sullivan faces renewed allegations of being a double agent, with former head of the Gauteng Hawks, Major-General Prince Mokotedi, claiming in a podcast that O'Sullivan worked for foreign intelligence agencies while posing as an anti-corruption activist. These claims resurface after Mokotedi and members of the South African intelligence community allegedly confirmed in 2017 that O'Sullivan was engaged in espionage. O'Sullivan has denied these accusations, stating he was involved with British military intelligence focused on counterterrorism but not acting as a spy. Mokotedi alleges O'Sullivan sought to withdraw his South African citizenship and cooperate with authorities in exchange for having charges against him dropped. Multiple legal cases against O'Sullivan, including charges of extortion, fraud, and espionage, have been filed or are under investigation.

Paul O’Sullivan, a forensic examiner known for his work in anti-corruption investigations, has once again found himself at the center of controversy following new allegations that he operated as a double agent for foreign intelligence agencies. These claims, made by Major-General Prince Mokotedi, former head of the Gauteng Hawks within the South African Police Service (SAPS), surfaced in a recent episode of the investigative podcast Unpopular Opinion, hosted by veteran journalist Mzilikazi wa Afrika. The episode, set to air on Saturday, 22 August, includes detailed accounts from Mokotedi, who asserts that he and other officials in the intelligence community confirmed in 2017 that O’Sullivan was engaged in espionage. O’Sullivan has categorically rejected these accusations, calling them “fictional” and accusing Mokotedi of being a criminal. He maintains that his involvement with the British Army and military intelligence was limited to counterterrorism efforts, particularly targeting Irish-related threats. During a parliamentary ad hoc committee session earlier this year, O’Sullivan testified that he had arrived in South Africa as a tourist and denied any role as a spy. However, Mokotedi claims that O’Sullivan approached him directly in July 2016, offering to renounce his South African citizenship and assist the police in exchange for having criminal charges against him dropped. The alleged meeting took place at SAPS provincial offices in Parktown, Johannesburg, with Mokotedi accompanied by two senior officers, Colonel Bongani Gininda and Commissioner Mpho Mmutle. According to Mokotedi, O’Sullivan's purported offer was part of a broader strategy to gain access to South Africa’s law enforcement and security networks. Mokotedi further stated that O’Sullivan’s true mission was to identify sleeper cells associated with radical Islamic groups, using his anti-corruption activism as a cover. Legal proceedings against O’Sullivan began in early 2017, with multiple cases filed under charges including extortion, fraud, intimidation, and possession of multiple passports. Among these, a case involving the unauthorized possession of three passports led to appearances in court on 26 and 27 January 2017. Additional charges, such as fraud linked to a pilot license, extortion, espionage, and money laundering, were either under investigation or transferred to the National Prosecuting Authority. Mokotedi claimed that their formal meeting occurred in late September 2017, during a gathering in Cape Town that included Major General Zamile Kulele, then head of Crime Intelligence in Gauteng, along with Major General Mzwandile Tiyo and agents from the State Security Agency (SSA). Despite these claims, O’Sullivan insists that all legal actions against him were fabricated, asserting that he was consistently found not guilty or that cases were dismissed outright. In response to Mokotedi’s allegations, O’Sullivan has accused him of being a political ally of former President Jacob Zuma, suggesting that Mokotedi’s motives stem from personal vendetta rather than genuine concern for national security. He has described Mokotedi as a “delusional” figure who should be incarcerated, emphasizing that Mokotedi’s continued public denouncements are aimed at influencing Zuma supporters. As the situation unfolds, both parties remain entrenched in their positions, with O’Sullivan preparing to challenge the credibility of Mokotedi’s claims in ongoing legal and public discourse. The outcome of these developments could have significant implications for the integrity of South Africa’s intelligence and law enforcement sectors.

1 reports

Mail & Guardian logoMail & GuardianIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
‘Paul O’Sullivan was a double agent’

Former forensic examiner Paul O'Sullivan faces renewed allegations of being a double agent, with former head of the Gauteng Hawks, Major-General Prince Mokotedi, claiming in a podcast that O'Sullivan worked for foreign intelligence agencies while posing as an anti-corruption activist. These claims resurface after Mokotedi and members of the South African intelligence community allegedly confirmed in 2017 that O'Sullivan was engaged in espionage. O'Sullivan has denied these accusations, stating he was involved with British military intelligence focused on counterterrorism but not acting as a spy. Mokotedi alleges O'Sullivan sought to withdraw his South African citizenship and cooperate with authorities in exchange for having charges against him dropped. Multiple legal cases against O'Sullivan, including charges of extortion, fraud, and espionage, have been filed or are under investigation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the allegations against O'Sullivan as credible and serious, emphasizing the involvement of high-ranking officials like Mokotedi and suggesting potential national security implications. The focus on foreign intelligence ties and the portrayal of O'Sullivan's actions as covert and s

Why factuality (85): The article reports on claims that Paul O'Sullivan was a double agent, citing statements from Major-General Prince Mokotedi and references to a podcast by Mzilikazi wa Afrika. These claims align with previous parliamentary committee discussions where O'Sullivan addressed his background. While no pri

Why objectivity (70): The article frames the claims as 'explosive' and emphasizes Mokotedi's accusations, suggesting a potential bias toward the allegations. The language used ('double agent', 'criminal') carries a negative connotation, and the focus on Mokotedi's claims may reflect a particular perspective rather than p

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories