ON
← Back to feed
Parle, retailer ordered to pay ₹50,000 for underweight biscuit packet
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Parle, retailer ordered to pay ₹50,000 for underweight biscuit packet

The Kannur district Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled that Parle Products Private Limited and Metro Hypermarket must collectively pay ₹50,000 to a consumer who discovered that a Parle 20-20 biscuit packet labeled as 150 grams actually contained only 126.6 grams. The commission found that the packet was a genuine Parle product based on its GST details and other identifiers, rejecting the manufacturer's claim that the packet might not have been theirs. Metro Hypermarket admitted to selling a genuine Parle product but shifted responsibility to the manufacturer. The commission held both the manufacturer and retailer liable for the underweight product, ordering Parle to pay ₹35,000 (₹25,000 compensation and ₹10,000 litigation costs) and Metro Hypermarket ₹15,000 (₹10,000 compensation and ₹5,000 litigation costs). The ruling emphasizes that both manufacturers and sellers share responsibility for ensuring product quality and accuracy.

A consumer in Kerala has secured a ruling against Parle Products Private Limited and Metro Hypermarket after alleging that a pack of biscuits was significantly underweight. The Kannur district Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has ordered both entities to jointly pay ₹50,000 as compensation for the alleged deficiency in the product's weight. The decision was made following a complaint filed by T.P. Ashik, who claimed that a packet of Parle 20-20 biscuits, purchased from Metro Hypermarket in Chakkarakkal, contained less than the advertised weight. T.P. Ashik bought the biscuit packet on July 26, 2024, from Metro Hypermarket. Upon weighing the packet at a nearby shop, he discovered that it measured approximately 125 grams instead of the stated 150 grams. He subsequently filed a complaint with the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. During the investigation, the Legal Metrology department verified the packet's weight, confirming it to be 126.6 grams, thereby validating the claim of underweight packaging. The commission's bench, consisting of President Ravi Susha and members Molukutty Mathew and K.P. Sajeesh, ruled that the packet in question was indeed a genuine product of Parle. Despite the manufacturer's argument that the packet might not have been produced by them and that all items were machine-packed in bulk, the court noted that the packet bore the company's GST details and other identifying information. Additionally, the retailer confirmed that it had sold a genuine Parle product, thus dismissing the manufacturer's defense. The commission further determined that the retailer could not absolve itself of responsibility by claiming the item was sealed. It emphasized that selling an underweight product constitutes a deficiency in service on the part of both the manufacturer and the seller. As a result, Parle was ordered to pay ₹25,000 and Metro Hypermarket ₹10,000 as compensation. In addition, each party was required to contribute ₹10,000 and ₹5,000 respectively toward litigation costs, bringing the total amount to ₹50,000. Both parties were instructed to settle the payment within one month of receiving the order. If they fail to comply, the outstanding amount will accrue 12% annual interest from the date of the order. Mr. Ashik expressed his motivation for pursuing the case, stating that he believed many consumers unknowingly received underweight products and sought to ensure accountability among companies while empowering consumers to take legal action. K.P. Mohammed Sinan, representing the complainant, highlighted that the judgment reinforces the enforceability of consumer rights, regardless of the product's value or the amount involved. He added that the ruling encourages awareness among consumers and serves as a reminder to manufacturers and retailers of their ongoing legal obligations.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 782 days ago
Parle, retailer ordered to pay ₹50,000 for underweight biscuit packet

The Kannur district Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled that Parle Products Private Limited and Metro Hypermarket must collectively pay ₹50,000 to a consumer who discovered that a Parle 20-20 biscuit packet labeled as 150 grams actually contained only 126.6 grams. The commission found that the packet was a genuine Parle product based on its GST details and other identifiers, rejecting the manufacturer's claim that the packet might not have been theirs. Metro Hypermarket admitted to selling a genuine Parle product but shifted responsibility to the manufacturer. The commission held both the manufacturer and retailer liable for the underweight product, ordering Parle to pay ₹35,000 (₹25,000 compensation and ₹10,000 litigation costs) and Metro Hypermarket ₹15,000 (₹10,000 compensation and ₹5,000 litigation costs). The ruling emphasizes that both manufacturers and sellers share responsibility for ensuring product quality and accuracy.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a consumer rights issue involving a court ruling against a manufacturer and retailer for providing an underweight product. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. The content is factual and balanced, focusing on the legal process and责任分

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about a consumer dispute case involving Parle biscuits being underweight. It cites the decision of the Kannur district Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, including the specific weights measured and the arguments presented by both the manufacturer and th

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the facts of the case neutrally but includes quotes from the commission president explaining the reasoning behind the decision. There is some editorializing in the phrasing, such as 'explaining the Commission’s reasoning,' which slightly leans toward presenting the official pers

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
Ordered WeCool earbuds, received BoAt instead: commission orders Rs 8K compensation

A consumer in Kerala filed a complaint against an e-commerce platform after receiving incorrect earbuds (BoAt instead of WeCool Moonwalk Mini). The Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ruled in favor of the consumer, ordering the platform to refund the purchase price of Rs 359 and provide additional compensation of Rs 8,000. The commission determined that delivering the wrong product and failing to respond to the consumer’s concerns constituted a deficiency in service and an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection Act. The e-commerce platform did not appear before the commission or provide any counter-evidence, leading to the ruling against them.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual legal ruling without overt ideological framing. While the issue involves consumer rights and corporate accountability, which can have political implications, the tone remains neutral, focusing on the legal process and outcome rather than taking a partisan stance. The '

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories