In a significant move that has sparked both celebration and controversy, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, has lifted a decades-old ban on gay sex bathhouses. The decision comes amid growing calls from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and progressive lawmakers to revisit policies they argue were rooted in outdated prejudices. The repeal of the ban, signed into law by Frey on Monday, marks a pivotal moment in the city's approach to LGBTQ+ rights and public health.
The original ban on commercial sex venues, commonly referred to as bathhouses, was enacted in 1988 during the peak of the AIDS crisis. At that time, local officials, including several who identified as gay, viewed these establishments as high-risk environments for the spread of HIV. The Washington Post noted that Minneapolis had three such venues back then, which were frequently visited by gay men seeking sexual encounters. Similar actions were taken in other cities, with San Francisco shutting down its bathhouses in 1984 and New York following suit in 1985 as part of broader efforts to curb the spread of the virus.
The recent decision to repeal the ban was approved by the Minneapolis City Council in a 9-2 vote. Two council members opposed the change, with one abstaining and another being absent. Among the dissenters was Democrat Elizabeth Shaffer, who expressed concerns about constituent feedback and the city's anticipated budget challenges. She argued that the issue should not take precedence over other pressing matters related to city services. Despite these reservations, the majority of the council members supported the repeal, emphasizing their commitment to supporting the LGBTQ+ community.
Supporters of the repeal highlighted the potential benefits of allowing such venues to operate openly. Advocacy groups, including Action Network, contended that the previous ban had inadvertently hindered public health initiatives by driving sexual activities underground. They pointed out that commercial sex spaces can foster safer sex practices, increase access to HIV testing and treatment, and promote a sense of identity and belonging among LGBTQ+ individuals. These arguments were echoed by Socialist council member Jason Chavez, who co-authored the repeal. He emphasized the historical context of the ban, noting that it was steeped in homophobia and targeted the LGBTQ+ community specifically.
The repeal aligns with a broader initiative known as the "Pride in Policy" package, which aims to demonstrate Minneapolis' support for its LGBTQ+ residents. This package encompasses updates to city codes with more gender-inclusive language, a study on expanding all-gender restrooms throughout the city, and revisions to public indecency laws to be more inclusive of the LGBTQ+ community. Following the repeal, the council will need to establish new zoning and safety regulations for these venues, ensuring they meet contemporary standards while protecting public health.
As Minneapolis moves forward with this new policy, it joins other cities in Minnesota, such as Duluth and St. Paul, which already permit commercial sex venues under varying degrees of regulation. The decision reflects a shift in attitudes toward LGBTQ+ rights and public health, acknowledging the complex interplay between personal freedoms and communal well-being. With Pride weekend approaching, the timing of this repeal adds an additional layer of significance, highlighting the city's evolving stance on inclusivity and acceptance within its diverse population.
2 reports
The Daily WireIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 5510 days agoThe Minneapolis City Council voted to repeal a 38-year-old ban on commercial sex venues, including gay bathhouses, just days before the Twin Cities Pride Festival. All nine voting members were Democrats, though some aligned with the DFL or DSA. One Democrat, Elizabeth Shaffer, opposed the repeal, citing constituent concerns and budget constraints. The ban originated in 1988 amid the AIDS crisis, linking homosexual activity to disease transmission. Advocacy groups argued the ban hindered public health by driving sexual activity into unsafe, hidden spaces. Socialist council member Jason Chavez highlighted the ban’s roots in homophobia and emphasized the lack of LGBTQ+ representation in decision-making. The repeal aligns with Minneapolis’ broader 'Pride in Policy' initiative, which includes gender-inclusive language updates and plans for all-gender restrooms. The council now needs to establish zoning and safety rules for these venues, following examples set by other Minnesota cities.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the repeal of a historically discriminatory policy rooted in homophobia, highlights the role of progressive politicians and organizations like the DSA, and frames the decision as part of a larger effort to advance LGBTQ+ rights. It presents the opposition as a minority view, c
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 55): The article accurately reports the repeal of the bathhouse ban and includes relevant details from the primary source. However, it frames the event as happening 'just days before the Twin Cities Pride Festival,' which isn't mentioned in the primary source. It also adds context about the political aff
Breitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 60Objective 356 days agoMinneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) signed an ordinance repealing a decades-old ban on adult bathhouses, which were previously restricted due to concerns over the spread of HIV during the AIDS crisis. The ban, enacted in 1988, was lifted after the Minneapolis City Council voted 9-2 to remove it, citing that the restriction was discriminatory. The decision comes amid broader debates about LGBTQ rights and public health policies. Frey expressed support for the repeal, stating Minneapolis would stand with its LGBTQIA+ community. Notably, Frey had recently celebrated Somalia's Independence Day, a country where homosexuality is criminalized.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the repeal of the bathhouse ban as a progressive action while highlighting Frey's celebration of Somalia's Independence Day—a country with anti-LGBTQ laws—as a potential contradiction. This juxtaposition suggests a critical stance toward Frey's actions, implying a conservative or右
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 35): This article contains several inaccuracies and biased language. It incorrectly states that the ban was lifted by the mayor directly, when the primary source indicates the city council voted to repeal it, and the mayor's office plans to sign it. The article uses inflammatory language such as 'gay sex
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
