PAN demands that the CDMX Congress approve the Law on Territorial Planning; accuses six years of delay

The political landscape in Mexico City has taken a new turn as the National Action Party (PAN) has formally demanded that the City Congress approve the Territorial Ordering Law, which has been pending for six years. This demand comes amid growing concerns over the lack of progress on critical legislative matters that affect urban planning and governance in the capital.

According to Luisa Gutiérrez, president of the PAN's local branch, the delay in passing this law reflects a lack of seriousness on the part of the ruling party, Morena, which controls the majority in the City Congress. She criticized Morena’s approach, stating that their tendency to act quickly without consultation or consensus has led to stagnation in essential legislation. Gutiérrez emphasized that Morena, having held the majority in previous legislative sessions, should have prioritized the creation of the Territorial Ordering Law but instead neglected it.

Federico Döring, a federal deputy and spokesperson for the PAN in Mexico City, pointed out that since the adoption of the City Constitution in 2018, the local Congress had a clear mandate to enact the Territorial Ordering Law. However, he noted that two full presidential terms have passed without any significant progress. Instead of focusing on creating the necessary legal framework, resources were allegedly misused on projects deemed ineffective, such as the "ajolote" branding campaign, which symbolizes the city's identity but does not address the real issues facing its residents.

Döring highlighted the legal and social consequences of this legislative omission. He stated that the continued use of the 2010 Urban Development Law, which is now considered incompatible with the 2017 constitutional framework, creates a legal vacuum. Experts warn that the current planning instruments lack adequate legal support, contributing to corruption in the real estate sector. Additionally, there is a violation of rights, particularly concerning the participation of indigenous communities and neighborhoods in territorial management, as required consultations have not been carried out.

The situation underscores broader challenges related to urban governance and transparency in Mexico City. The absence of a comprehensive Territorial Ordering Law leaves gaps in how the city plans for growth, infrastructure, and community engagement. Without this law, officials face difficulties in making informed decisions about land use, zoning, and public services, leading to potential inefficiencies and conflicts.

Reactions from various stakeholders highlight the significance of this issue. Local experts stress the need for inclusive and legally sound policies to ensure sustainable development. Community leaders from indigenous groups and historic neighborhoods argue that their voices must be heard in shaping the future of the city. Meanwhile, civil society organizations call for greater accountability from both the executive and legislative branches to address these long-standing delays.

Looking ahead, the PAN continues to push for the approval of the Territorial Ordering Law, emphasizing that it is crucial for effective urban planning and equitable governance. They expect the City Congress to take immediate action, given the urgency of the matter and the legal obligations that have been ignored for years. If the law is finally enacted, it could mark a turning point in how Mexico City approaches its development challenges, ensuring that all communities have a say in the processes that shape their environment and future.