Pigeon commented on Slovenia's drop in the IMD ranking and the new government's statement
Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement and former prime minister, commented on Slovenia's drop in the IMD competitiveness ranking and the new government's statement. He emphasized distinguishing between concrete data and survey responses. Slovenia fell three places to 49th out of 70 countries this year, with the biggest decline in governmental efficiency. The IMD report evaluates countries' ability to maintain environments supporting business competitiveness, based on 262 indicators across four pillars: economic success, governmental efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure. A
In June 2026, Slovenia was ranked 49th on the International Institute for Management Development (IMD) World Competitiveness Index. This marks a decline of three positions compared to the previous year, placing Slovenia within the group of countries with medium-high competitiveness. Despite this drop, Slovenia remains relatively stable within the broader European context, as most other European Union (EU) member states also experienced a decline in their rankings. The country continues to perform well in areas such as international trade, infrastructure, safety, low income inequality, and the quality of human capital—factors that remain crucial foundations for future economic growth.
The IMD ranking evaluates a nation's ability to create and maintain an environment that fosters business competitiveness and long-term prosperity for its citizens. It is based on 262 indicators that combine statistical data and evaluations from managers of micro, small, medium, and large businesses. These indicators assess competitiveness through four main pillars: economic success, government efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure. The overall ranking reflects a country’s relative competitive position over time when compared to others. Slovenia remains in the group of nations with medium-high competitiveness, characterized by distinct areas of excellence.
According to Irena Meterc, head of the entrepreneurship sector at SPIRIT Slovenia, understanding a country's competitive position during times of intense global competition for investments, talents, and development projects is essential. She emphasized that national competitiveness is not self-evident but rather the result of decisions made today and the ability to respond promptly to findings from such research. SPIRIT Slovenia has supported the IMD competitiveness study for many years, using its methodology alongside the World Economic Forum (WEF) to promote the Slovenian economy abroad, engage with investors, and shape policies aimed at internationalization and attracting investments.
The results of the 2026 IMD study highlight that national competitiveness increasingly depends on strong institutions, effective state management, and the ability to adapt to uncertain international environments. The top-performing countries include Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland, which consistently rank among the best in terms of government efficiency. These nations demonstrate the critical role of institutional credibility, adaptability, and resilience. Four EU member states are among the top ten countries in the ranking.
Slovenia ranks 49th out of 70 countries. Similar to most EU countries, Slovenia has worsened its position by three places. The decline primarily reflects lower ratings in government efficiency and economic success. On individual aspects, Slovenia ranks 42nd in economic success, 55th in government efficiency, 56th in business efficiency, and 38th in infrastructure, where it shows improvement and remains one of the stronger areas of its competitive profile.
Despite a slight decline since 2024, Slovenia maintains several significant competitive advantages, including strong international trade integration, high levels of security, low income inequality, and developed research infrastructure. Key macroeconomic factors continue to influence these outcomes.
Sonja Uršič from the Institute for Economic Research (IER), which conducts the study in collaboration with Ljubljana University's Faculty of Economics and is supported by SPIRIT, noted that the key message of this year's IMD report is that economic success relies heavily on robust institutions and the ability to manage uncertainty and shocks. National competitive advantage is increasingly dependent on institutional credibility, adaptability, and resilience.
Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland lead the rankings, maintaining their top positions in government efficiency. Singapore has advanced on several fronts, particularly in business efficiency, while Hong Kong excels in all four categories. Switzerland dropped from first to third place due to a notable decline in economic success, attributed to reduced direct investment flows.
Among EU countries, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, and Sweden occupy positions six through nine. Fifteen EU countries have seen a decline in their rankings, with Lithuania and Romania experiencing the most significant drops. The United States rose to tenth place, aided by improved manager sentiment, while China climbed to twelfth. Five EU countries retained their rankings, including Croatia at 53rd. Seven EU countries improved their standings, with Poland rising eleven places to 41st.
The IMD ranking assesses a country's ability to sustain an environment supporting business competitiveness. The composite index is based on 262 indicators across four pillars—economic success, government efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure. Approximately two-thirds of the indicators are statistical, while a third is derived from surveys conducted with leading managers. In Slovenia, these surveys were carried out in March, during the pre-election period.
In the pillar of economic success, Slovenia fell five places to 42nd. The decline resulted from a drop in the domestic economy subcategory to 56th, due to slowed economic growth and weaker resistance to cycles. Improvements were observed in corporate investment growth and the economic complexity index. In the pricing subcategory, Slovenia dropped to 22nd, mainly due to higher housing, office space, and fuel prices.
Uršič highlighted that Slovenia gained two positions in international trade, moving to eighth place—a historically competitive area. However, in the foreign investment subcategory, Slovenia maintained its 58th position. The situation regarding direct foreign investment is significantly lower than in neighboring or higher-tier countries, with companies strongly downgrading the risk of relocating business activities from Slovenia, resulting in a 30-place drop to 65th.
In the employment subcategory, Slovenia ranked 40th, performing better than the previous year. Lower rankings were recorded in the labor force participation rate, influenced by aging populations, but better performance was noted in unemployment rates.
In the government efficiency pillar, Slovenia experienced the largest decline, dropping seven places to 55th. It performed poorly in all subcategories except tax policy, where the competitive advantage lies in low taxation of legal entities, though high taxation of labor remains a weakness.
The greatest declines according to survey-based indicators occurred in business legislation (ranked 61st) and the effectiveness of managing state-owned enterprises (67th), hiring foreigners (55th), and government protectionism (50th). Competitive weaknesses persist in labor law (67th), where companies likely considered the recent introduction of winter regression and increased minimum wage. Slovenia also lags behind in the effectiveness of legislation governing unemployment (68th). Companies view the adequacy of investment incentives for implementing artificial intelligence as insufficient.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Prime Minister Janez Janša will attend a European Council meeting in Brussels alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to discuss further support for Ukraine. The agenda includes strengthening economic competitiveness and trade relations with China. Hungary's new Prime Minister Peter Magyar will make his first appearance at the European Council meeting. Discussions may also touch upon direct talks with Moscow.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or emphasis. It reports on scheduled meetings and discussions without taking a stance on their implications or outcomes. The content remains neutral in tone and does not favor any particular political perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): Highly accurate with detailed analysis from GZS. Maintains a balanced perspective while presenting the facts clearly.
Maribor24IndependentRightFactual 95Objective 8515 days ago
Prime Minister Janez Janša commented during a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels on Slovenia's decline in competitiveness according to the Swiss Institute IMD rankings. Slovenia dropped three places to rank 49th out of 70 countries. Janša emphasized that strengthening economic competitiveness is crucial for Slovenia's success and criticized the lack of focus on this issue at the current European Council session.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Prime Minister Janez Janša's comments emphasizing the need to strengthen Slovenia's economic competitiveness, which aligns with his political agenda. The framing highlights his concerns and critiques of the European Council's priorities, suggesting a right-leaning perspective by
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Accurate reporting of the drop in Slovenia's competitiveness ranking and Janša's comments. Some minor omissions but overall faithful to the primary source.
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8515 days ago
Slovenia has dropped three places to 49th position on this year's competitiveness ranking by the Swiss institute IMD among 70 countries. The biggest decline was recorded in governmental efficiency, where Slovenia fell seven places to 55th. Poorer ratings were received in business legislation, management of state-owned companies, employment of foreigners, and public finances. The research also notes worse perceptions of the efficiency of the rule of law and stability of the institutional environment. Public finances were affected mainly by an increase in the fiscal deficit. Despite these issues
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from the IMD report without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on Slovenia's drop in rankings and attributes it to specific factors like governmental efficiency and public finances, citing statements from experts without taking a clear stance.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with specific details about Slovenia's drop in ranking and reasons like government efficiency. Slightly less objective due to emphasis on infrastructure as a strength.
Si21IndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 8515 days ago
Slovenia has dropped further down the International Institute for Management Development (IMD) competitiveness ranking, now placing 49th out of 70 countries, the lowest since 2015. The head of the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce, Vesna Nahtigal, emphasizes the need for a development agreement, a stable business environment, and swift implementation of systemic measures to improve Slovenia's attractiveness to investors. She calls for decisive action and collaboration between the government, unions, civil society, and businesses to achieve economic breakthroughs.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts about Slovenia's drop in the competitiveness index and includes direct quotes from an official source (Vesna Nahtigal, head of the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce). It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains客观
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 85): Well-researched report with comprehensive data and expert commentary. Maintains neutrality throughout.
The Slovenia TimesIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 9015 days ago
Hong Kong has risen to the second position in the 2026 World Competitiveness Ranking, according to the International Institute for Management Development (IMD). This marks Hong Kong's highest ranking since 2019 and follows three consecutive years of improvement. The HKSAR Government welcomed the report, highlighting Hong Kong's sustained upward trajectory. According to the report, Hong Kong ranks second in 'Government efficiency' and third in 'Business efficiency', while 'Infrastructure' and 'Economic performance' rank eighth and 11th respectively.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information based on an official report from the International Institute for Management Development (IMD), with no apparent ideological framing, loaded language, or selective sourcing. The content focuses on economic competitiveness metrics without taking a stance on any
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 90): Very factual with specific rankings and historical context. Highly objective with neutral reporting of the data and comparisons.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 92Objective 8216 days ago
Slovenia has dropped three places on the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking 2026, now ranking 49th out of 70 countries. The decline is attributed mainly to lower scores in government efficiency and economic success. Slovenia ranks 42nd in economic success, 55th in government efficiency, 56th in business efficiency, and 38th in infrastructure, where it shows improvement. Despite the drop, Slovenia remains relatively stable within Europe, as most EU countries also saw declines. The report highlights the need for long-term improvements in productivity, institutional efficiency, innovation, and the
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from the IMD World Competitiveness Report without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It discusses both the decline and areas of improvement in Slovenia's competitiveness, providing balanced context about the broader European trend and necessary reforms.
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 82): Accurate and thorough coverage with direct quotes from Janša. Slight bias detectable in the framing of the issue.
DemokracijaParty-alignedRightFactual 92Objective 8015 days ago
Prime Minister Janez Janša commented on Slovenia's drop in the competitiveness ranking by the Swiss Institute IMD, stating that improving the country's economic competitiveness will require significant effort. He noted that the current European Council meeting does not focus enough on competitiveness. Slovenia ranked 49th out of 70 countries, dropping three places compared to last year. The country performed best in infrastructure but worst in business efficiency and government effectiveness.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Prime Minister Janša's comments emphasizing the need to improve Slovenia's competitiveness, which aligns with his government's agenda. The framing highlights the challenges facing the economy under his leadership without providing counterpoints or alternative perspectives. The o
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 80): Reliable coverage of the event with direct quotes from Janša. Slightly less detailed than others but still factually sound.
Siol.netState / PublicRightFactual 90Objective 8015 days ago
Slovenia has dropped three places on the IMD competitiveness ranking, now sitting at 49th out of 70 countries. The country performed best in infrastructure but worst in business efficiency and government effectiveness. Prime Minister Janez Janša commented on the decline, stating that improving Slovenia's competitiveness will require significant effort. He also noted that the current European Council meeting does not place enough emphasis on competitiveness.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Prime Minister Janez Janša's comments directly, emphasizing his concerns about Slovenia's economic competitiveness and the lack of focus on this issue at the European Council. The framing highlights the need for 'significant effort' and implies criticism of current priorities, a
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Reliable reporting with good contextual information. Slightly more emotive language but remains mostly factual.
LokalecIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 7815 days ago
Prime Minister Janez Janša commented on Slovenia's drop in the competitiveness ranking by the Swiss Institute IMD, stating that improving the country's economic competitiveness will require significant effort. He noted that the current European Council meeting does not focus enough on competitiveness. Slovenia ranked 49th out of 70 countries, dropping three places compared to last year. The country performed best in infrastructure but worst in business efficiency and government effectiveness.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Prime Minister Janša's comments on Slovenia's decline in competitiveness, emphasizing his assertion that 'we have a lot of work to do' to improve the economy. The framing highlights Janša’s emphasis on competitiveness as a key priority for the new government, aligning with his '
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 78): Correctly reports the main facts but has some structural issues and missing details compared to the primary source.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 7514 days ago
Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement and former prime minister, commented on Slovenia's drop in the IMD competitiveness ranking and the new government's statement. He emphasized distinguishing between concrete data and survey responses. Slovenia fell three places to 49th out of 70 countries this year, with the biggest decline in governmental efficiency. The IMD report evaluates countries' ability to maintain environments supporting business competitiveness, based on 262 indicators across four pillars: economic success, governmental efficiency, business efficiency, and infrastructure. A
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Slovenia's position in the IMD competitiveness index and includes quotes from Robert Golob without overtly biased language or framing. It does not take a clear stance on the issue but reports on Golob's comments and the findings of the IMD report.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Factual but includes political commentary from Golob. Less objective due to clear political stance and reference to previous government policies.
The Slovenia TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8015 days ago
Slovenia has fallen three places in the latest global competitiveness rankings by the Swiss IMD institute, now ranked 49th out of 70 countries. The decline is attributed primarily to poor government efficiency, while Slovenia performs best in infrastructure and worst in business efficiency. Key challenges identified include an unpredictable business environment, low productivity, inefficient public services, excessive administrative burdens, fiscal sustainability concerns, and housing affordability issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Slovenia's drop in the global competitiveness ranking without overtly favoring any political side. It cites the IMD institute's findings and includes a statement from Sonja Uršič of the Institute for Economic Research, providing balanced perspectives on
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides specific details about Slovenia's drop in rankings, mentions the IMD institute, and includes quotes from experts. It cites sources and explains methodology. However, some interpretation of the report's implications may go beyond direct statements.
Žurnal24IndependentRightFactual 85Objective 7515 days ago
Prime Minister Janez Janša expressed disappointment over Slovenia's drop in the competitiveness ranking by the Swiss Institute IMD, stating that the country faces significant challenges in improving its economic competitiveness. He emphasized that the current European Council meeting did not focus enough on this issue. Slovenia ranked 49th out of 70 countries, with the worst performance in governmental efficiency.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Prime Minister Janša's perspective without counterpoints or alternative viewpoints. It emphasizes his concerns about Slovenia's economic competitiveness and frames them as critical issues requiring immediate attention, aligning with a right-leaning emphasis on national economic
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Contains accurate information but lacks depth and has some incomplete sections. The tone is slightly more opinionated.
Si21IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 9016 days ago
Slovenia ranked 49th in the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking for 2026, dropping three places compared to last year. However, it remains relatively stable within the broader European context, as most EU countries also saw declines. Slovenia continues to perform well in areas such as international trade, infrastructure, safety, low income inequality, and quality of human capital. The report highlights the need for long-term improvements in productivity, institutional efficiency, innovation environment, and attracting and developing talent to enhance competitiveness.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from the IMD ranking without overtly positive or negative commentary. It notes both the decline in rank and the relative stability within Europe, while highlighting strengths and areas needing improvement. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 90): This article presents Slovenia's 49th position on the IMD 2026 competitiveness ranking accurately and includes relevant contextual details about its performance relative to other European countries. It avoids overt bias and maintains a neutral tone while discussing both strengths and areas needing i
Zanima.meIndependentLeftFactual 80Objective 7015 days ago
A Swiss report indicates that Slovenia has significantly declined in global competitiveness during the tenure of Prime Minister Janez Janša, with the most notable drop in the efficiency of the government.
Bias read (Left): The article highlights a decline in government efficiency under Prime Minister Janez Janša, who is associated with the right-wing Slovenian Democratic Party. The framing emphasizes negative outcomes during his leadership, suggesting criticism of his administration's performance.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): Provides correct basic facts but lacks contextual details and has a more interpretive tone rather than objective reporting.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 8515 days ago
The article discusses Slovenia's drop to 49th place on the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking, citing factors such as institutional strength, adaptability, and resilience. The report was presented by Sonja Uršič from the Institute for Economic Research (IER), which collaborates with Ljubljana University's Faculty of Economics and is supported by the agency Spirit. Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland lead the ranking, while several European Union countries have seen their positions decline, including Lithuania and Romania. The United States improved to 10th place, and Poland made significant进步
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Slovenia's position in the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking without overtly favoring any political side. It includes quotes from an academic institution and mentions various countries' rankings objectively.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed information about Slovenia's ranking on the IMD competitiveness index, citing specific details such as the drop to 49th place and mentions of other countries' rankings. However, some specifics like the exact reasons for Slovenia's decline are not clearly supported by ot
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 6015 days ago
Prime Minister Janez Janša commented on Slovenia's decline in the competitiveness ranking by the Swiss institute IMD, stating that strengthening Slovenia's economic competitiveness will require significant effort. He emphasized that the current European Council meeting focuses too little on competitiveness and other key issues such as the EU budget and internal market conditions. Slovenia ranked 49th out of 70 countries, dropping three places compared to last year, with the lowest score in governmental efficiency.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Prime Minister Janša's comments without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports his views on Slovenia's economic challenges and the focus of the European Council meeting neutrally, without emphasizing one political perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article accurately reports Slovenia's drop in the IMD ranking but includes some subjective commentary from Janša about the EU agenda being too focused on war. It cites the ranking details correctly but leans into political interpretation.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 50Objective 5015 days ago
Slovenia has dropped to 49th place on the International Institute for Management Development (IMD) competitiveness ranking. The article provides historical data showing Slovenia's highest placement was 32nd in 2009 and its lowest was 52nd in 2005. In recent years, Slovenia's best performance was 38th in 2022. The top three countries on the latest ranking are Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland, with Singapore advancing due to improved business efficiency and Hong Kong performing well across all categories. Switzerland fell to third place due to a decline in economic performance linked to a放缓
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual rankings without overtly biased language, framing, or emphasis. It reports on international economic competitiveness rankings objectively, citing specific positions and reasons for changes in rankings without taking a stance.
The article discusses the upcoming State Assembly ceremony on the Day of Statehood, where Robert Golob, leader of the Freedom Movement, will attend for the first time. Previously, Urška Klakočar Zupančič, former President of the National Assembly, was the main attendee, but her relationship with Golob has deteriorated since he introduced his new partner, Tino Gaber. Klakočar Zupančič resigned from her position as deputy party leader in 2023, citing her focus on leading the National Assembly. She expressed disappointment over Golob’s absence from previous ceremonies, noting he had attended only once before. In 2023, speculation arose that Golob avoided attending due to his partner’s inability to sit beside him, though this was denied by his cabinet. This year, however, Golob is expected to attend the ceremony, marking a change from past behavior.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Klakočar Zupančič’s criticism of Golob’s absence and the explanation provided by his cabinet—without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the event neutrally, focusing on the facts and quotes from both parties involved.
Slovenia has dropped further down the IMD competitiveness ranking, falling from 38th to 49th place among 70 countries between 2022 and 2026. The decline is attributed to worsening economic conditions, including inefficiencies in state governance, an unfavorable business environment, excessive regulation, and administrative burdens on businesses. The Trade Chamber of Slovenia highlights structural challenges such as unpredictable economic conditions linked to energy risks, insufficient productivity growth, inefficient delivery of public services, and high administrative costs for companies. These issues have led to reduced attractiveness for domestic and foreign investments, weakened trade, and a loss of purchasing power within the country. The organization calls for urgent action to improve the business climate and address these systemic problems.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual assessment of Slovenia's declining position in the IMD competitiveness index, citing specific data and expert opinions from the Trade Chamber of Slovenia. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, nor does it favor one political side over another. Instead, it frames
Slovenia has dropped to 49th place out of 70 countries on the competitiveness index published by the Swiss Institute IMD, according to the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce (TZS). The decline reflects ongoing challenges such as an unpredictable business environment linked to energy risks, low productivity growth, inefficient public services, and excessive administrative burdens on businesses. The chamber attributes this drop primarily to past economic policies that have led to accumulated financial and administrative burdens on the economy. They criticize previous political decisions for being made without sufficient expert discussion or consideration of their impact on the economy. The trade sector is expected to feel the most immediate effects of the uncompetitive business environment, with consumers also experiencing consequences through reduced purchasing power. The chamber calls for constructive engagement from the government and stronger collaboration with the private sector, emphasizing that the success of future measures will depend largely on the quality of social dialogue and the willingness of ministries and the government to cooperate with stakeholders.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a critical assessment of Slovenia's economic performance and past policies but does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It quotes the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce, which provides a balanced perspective on the issues facing the economy. There is no clear倾向
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
