Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita, optužuje novinara Telegrama, Denis Mahmutovića, za to da mu naređuje institucije poput DORH-a da ga progone. U epizodi 'Prvi glas' na Telegramu, Mahmutović razgovara o Kerumovim imotenjima, uključujući privatište u Rogoznici koje je proglašeno ilegalnim, te o njegovom dugotrajnom utjecaju u Splitu i Dalmaciji. Mahmutović navodi da je Kerumova reakcija na objave sve nervoznija i paranoičnija, posebno nakon što je objavio optužbe protiv institucija. Također se diskutira mogućnost da splitsko Gradsko vijeće ostane bez Kerumove većine ako dođe do političkog pada, te status SDP-a u Splitu.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between Željko Kerum and Denis Mahmutović, highlighting both Kerum's claims and Mahmutović's counterpoints without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on factual allegations and responses rather than taking a clear stance.
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about Zeljko Kerum's claims regarding being targeted by institutions like DORH and others, citing Denis Mahmutović as a source. It also references legal issues around property in Rogoznica and construction in Pršut. These points align with general reporting on K
Why objectivity (65): The article presents information from Denis Mahmutović but frames it in a way that suggests Kerum is acting suspiciously and paranoid. The tone leans toward skepticism of Kerum’s actions, using phrases like 'paranoičnija' and implying his behavior is questionable. This introduces a subtle bias rathe





