Pacto proposes a "shadow cabinet" to control Abelardo

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 852 days ago

The article discusses tensions within Colombia's political landscape ahead of the new government's assumption of power. Former President Álvaro Uribe expresses concerns that the incoming administration, led by Abelardo de la Espriella, seeks to dismantle his political movement, the Centro Democrático. De la Espriella has secured support from various coalitions, including the Green alliance and ASI, giving him 40 votes for the Senate presidency, while the uribist candidate, Honorio Henríquez, only managed 18 votes. To challenge the current majority, the Centro Democrático would need to form an unlikely coalition with their ideological rival, the Pacto Histórico. Meanwhile, the Justice and Peace Tribunal (JEP) has requested a meeting with de la Espriella to discuss its progress, despite the latter having promised during his campaign to eliminate the institution.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—Uribe's concerns about the new government's intentions and de la Espriella's efforts to secure Senate leadership—without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information on vote counts and political alliances, maintaining neutrality in its framing.

Why factuality (95): The article comprehensively covers the ongoing conflict between the new government and Álvaro Uribe, accurately reflecting the concerns expressed in the primary source document. It details the political maneuvering around the Senate presidency and the potential alliances.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced approach, presenting both sides of the argument without showing preference. It uses neutral language to describe the political dynamics at play.

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 855 days ago

The article outlines the selection of 35 senators and 32 representatives who will serve as compromisarios to determine leadership positions within Colombia's Congress. These roles include presiding over 14 committees (seven in each chamber) and the presidencies of both chambers, which will be decided on July 20. The process involves negotiations between political parties, particularly highlighting tensions between the ruling Center Democratic Party and opposition factions. The Uribismo faction seeks candidates aligned with Álvaro Uribe, while the Pacto Histórico, led by the majority in the Senate, has selected Carolina Corcho as its representative. In the Chamber of Representatives, the Pacto's group is headed by Aída Quilcué, a former leftist vice-presidential candidate. The article emphasizes the political maneuvering involved in reshaping congressional power.

Bias read (Center): While the article covers politically charged content involving competing factions and leadership appointments, it presents the information in a balanced manner by detailing multiple perspectives and outcomes without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports on the actions and strategies of各方,

Why factuality (95): The article thoroughly covers the selection process for the Senate and Chamber of Representatives, including the roles of various parties and candidates. It references the primary source document indirectly through mentions of the power struggle involving Álvaro Uribe and the Center Democratic Party

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts about the political landscape without taking sides. It provides background information on different factions and their positions.

SemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 755 days ago

El ex-presidente Gustavo Petro anunció que no asistirá a la ceremonia de posesión del nuevo presidente electo, Abelardo De La Espriella, el 7 de agosto, debido a su creencia de que hubo un fraude electoral de 848.000 votos. Petro sostiene que este fraude no ha sido comprobado judicialmente y, por ello, declara su ausencia tanto física como simbólica. Aunque tradicionalmente el presidente saliente participa en esta ceremonia, Petro argumenta que no puede reconocer públicamente a un mandatario que, según él, no representa la voluntad popular. Por otro lado, De La Espriella ha confirmado que se posesionará en una base militar del sur del país, pese a las objeciones de Petro. El proceso aún enfrenta resistencias dentro del Congreso, donde algunos grupos políticos se oponen a la celebración del juramento en un entorno militar.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta la postura de Gustavo Petro, quien, como líder izquierdista, cuestiona la legitimidad del gobierno entrante basándose en acusaciones de fraude electoral. Su declaración refleja una crítica directa al sistema electoral y una negación de la transición de poder, lo cual se alinea í

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports Asobancaria's rejection of Petro's claims and their support for De la Espriella's legitimacy. It references the official verification of the election and the international observers, aligning with other sources. The content is well-supported and free of unsubstantiated

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone while clearly stating Asobancaria's position. It avoids taking sides between Petro and De la Espriella but focuses on the implications of Petro's refusal to recognize the election results, which slightly skews the focus away from neutrality.

SemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 93Objective 609 days ago

The article discusses the final month of President Gustavo Petro's term in Colombia, highlighting his actions and rhetoric as he prepares to leave office on August 7, 2026. Petro has been refusing to acknowledge the election results where Abelardo De La Espriella narrowly defeated his ally Iván Cepeda, leading to criticism both within and outside his administration. In the last month, Petro plans to intensify his opposition to De La Espriella's government, aiming to mobilize supporters ahead of the Independence Day celebration on July 20. He intends to deliver speeches emphasizing his legacy and criticizing his successor, while also addressing the Congress to outline his governance achievements. The article notes that Petro has declined leadership roles within his former coalition, opting to remain distant from post-presidency politics.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Petro's actions as legitimate efforts to defend his legacy and mobilize support against his successor, using language that emphasizes his commitment to social issues and resistance to perceived threats. It portrays De La Espriella's government as a continuation of previous regimes

Why factuality (93): The article accurately describes Petro’s last month in office and his refusal to recognize De La Espriella’s victory. This aligns with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (60): The article uses highly biased language, calling Petro a 'dictator' and suggesting illegal activities, showing a strong preference for De La Espriella’s legitimacy over Petro’s claims.

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 803 days ago

The article discusses the ongoing negotiations within Colombia's Pacto Histórico coalition regarding the selection of a candidate to oppose the incoming government led by President Gustavo Petro. The coalition has not yet decided on a formal candidate but emphasizes a consensus-based approach. Key figures under consideration include Alfredo Deluque, backed by several parties, and Honorio Henríquez from the Centro Democrático. The article highlights tensions between supporters of Abelardo de la Espriella (abelardismo) and those aligned with former President Álvaro Uribe (uribismo). Uribe has actively promoted Henríquez, citing his party's offers of 'apertura y garantías' (openness and guarantees). Meanwhile, some members like Jota Pe Hernández have already expressed support for Henríquez due to opposition to Petro's administration.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents a contest between different political factions (abelardismo vs. uribismo), it does not clearly favor one side over the other. It reports on multiple perspectives, including statements from both sides and the internal dynamics of the Pacto Histórico. The framing remains non

Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the discussions within the Pacto Histórico regarding their stance on supporting a candidate for the Senate presidency. It reflects the uncertainty and strategic considerations mentioned in the primary source document.

Why objectivity (80): The article is generally neutral but shows some inclination towards the opposition by highlighting the need to prevent a 'fascist' government from setting the agenda. This slight bias affects the overall objectivity score.

La Silla VacíaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 755 days ago

The Pacto Histórico, led by former President Álvaro Uribe's coalition, proposes creating a 'shadow cabinet' to monitor government ministries during the administration of Abelardo de la Espriella. The idea was explained by ex-minister Carolina Corcho, now a senator, who compared it to opposition strategies used in other countries. The proposal suggests forming a technical team to track ministry activities and prepare legislative debates. While initially proposed by the Pacto alone, there is discussion about including the Alianza por la Vida, which supported Iván Cepeda during the presidential campaign. The concept is inspired by the British 'shadow cabinet,' where opposition parties form an alternative government structure. The move comes amid political tensions, with former president Nicolás Maduro criticizing the left-wing opposition as 'delirious' and accusing him of leaving the country in constitutional crisis. Meanwhile, Cepeda's call for 'civil disobedience' risks pushing the opposition beyond institutional channels into more uncertain democratic territory.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the 'shadow cabinet' initiative as a legitimate strategy for oversight, aligning with progressive values of transparency and accountability. It highlights the influence of leftist figures like Carolina Corcho and references the left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda. The critique of the左

Why factuality (90): This article details the proposal for a 'shadow cabinet' by the Pacto Histórico, including quotes from Carolina Corcho and references to similar practices in the UK. It provides specific information about the strategy and potential involvement of other groups like the Alliance for Life. The content

Why objectivity (75): While informative, the article presents the 'shadow cabinet' idea as a strategic move by the Pacto Histórico, suggesting they are taking an active role in monitoring the government. There is a slight tilt toward presenting this as a proactive opposition strategy rather than a neutral report on polit

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago

The article discusses the importance of institutional rules and checks in ensuring democratic governance, particularly in the context of Colombian politics. It critiques President Gustavo Petro's refusal to accept election results and his continued promotion of the idea that philosopher Iván Cepeda should be the next president despite losing the election. The author expresses skepticism toward both Petro and Cepeda, arguing that neither represents genuine democratic values. The piece emphasizes the need for strong institutions to constrain leaders, even if they prevent full exercise of power, as these institutions protect against tyranny and uphold constitutional order.

Bias read (Center): While the article criticizes both Gustavo Petro and Iván Cepeda, it does not clearly favor one side over the other. The tone remains balanced, focusing on the broader issue of institutional integrity rather than promoting a specific ideological stance. The critique is directed at behavior ratherthan

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the first cabinet meeting of the elected president, providing details about the location, participants, and agenda. It aligns with the primary source’s focus on political appointments and institutional processes. The information is factual and well-structured.

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, reporting on the event without taking sides or expressing personal views. It focuses on the procedural aspects of the meeting and the political context.

SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago

In an interview with SEMANA, Thierry Ways expresses moderate optimism regarding Colombia's future after August 7, noting that the election of Iván Cepeda as vice president marks a significant step forward. He acknowledges the challenges facing the new government under Abelardo De La Espriella, emphasizing that four years may not be enough to address all issues. Ways comments on the turbulent transition between Gustavo Petro’s administration and De La Espriella’s, suggesting that there may be cases of corruption requiring investigation. He notes that Petro enjoys ideological influence but lacks interest in the administrative responsibilities of governance, indicating that Petro may return to an opposition role.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced perspective on the political situation in Colombia, discussing both the challenges faced by the new government and the potential for progress. It does not exhibit strong bias toward any particular political figure or ideology, instead offering analysis based on the st

Why factuality (85): The article discusses Abelardo De La Espriella, Petro, and Cepeda, referencing Thierry Ways' comments but does not directly address the primary source document about Álvaro Uribe's statements regarding the Senate presidency and potential threats to his party. It focuses more on general political ana

Why objectivity (80): The article presents a balanced view of political optimism and challenges, using descriptive language without overt bias. However, it includes subjective terms like 'moderately optimistic' and 'personaje de reparto,' which may reflect the author’s perspective.

SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 753 days ago

Iván Cepeda, a former presidential candidate and senator from the Pacto Histórico coalition, stated that his group is open to political dialogue with the Centro Democrático and other legislative sectors regarding the election of congressional leadership. Cepeda emphasized that while his coalition does not recognize the legitimacy of Abelardo De La Espriella, they remain willing to engage in discussions with all political forces to find solutions beneficial to Colombia. The article notes that this potential dialogue is not unprecedented, as previous interactions between leftist and rightist groups have occurred. However, tensions remain high, particularly around the selection of Senate and Chamber of Representatives presidents, where the Centro Democrático seeks positions held by the Pacto Histórico. Right-wing factions warn that alliances could shift power dynamics within Congress.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Cepeda’s statements neutrally, emphasizing openness to dialogue without taking a stance on which side is more justified. It provides context about the political landscape and competing interests but avoids overtly favoring any faction. The framing remains balanced, focusing on C

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the political confrontation over Senate leadership and mentions the potential for dialogue. It aligns with the primary source’s focus on the conflict between Uribe and De La Espriella. However, it omits some specific details from the primary source, particularly the metaphor of

Why objectivity (75): The tone is neutral, presenting the political conflict and possible resolutions without taking sides. It avoids emotional language and sticks to factual reporting.

La Silla VacíaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

Claudia Sheinbaum, Presidenta de México, envió una carta de felicitación al presidente electo de Colombia, Abelardo de la Espriella, tras su victoria en las elecciones del 21 de junio. La carta fue firmada el 2 de julio, siete días después de que De la Espriella recibiera su credencial de elección. Sheinbaum, aliada política de Gustavo Petro y Iván Cepeda, reconoció el espíritu democrático del pueblo colombiano y destacó la relación bilateral entre México y Colombia basada en la amistad y principios compartidos. Además, expresó confianza en colaborar en temas como el combate al narcotráfico y el desarrollo económico. Esta alianza refleja una conexión entre líderes izquierdistas de América Latina, mientras que De la Espriella no tuvo contacto directo con México durante su campaña, a diferencia de Cepeda, quien mantuvo reuniones con figuras mexicanas.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo presenta a Claudia Sheinbaum como una figura progresista con alianzas políticas claras con líderes izquierdistas como Gustavo Petro y Iván Cepeda. La carta de felicitación se enmarca dentro de un contexto de cooperación entre gobiernos progresistas de América Latina, con énfasis en temas

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the competition for the Senate leadership positions, referencing political alliances and potential conflicts. It aligns with the general theme of political maneuvering and provides factual updates on the situation.

Why objectivity (75): While the article is factual, it has a slight leaning toward political analysis, particularly in highlighting the tensions between political factions. The tone is informative but carries some partisan undertones.

El EspectadorIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 852 days ago

Iván Cepeda, a prominent Colombian politician, has stated he will not attend the swearing-in ceremony of Abelardo de la Espriella on August 7th. This decision comes amid ongoing political tensions and debates surrounding de la Espriella's appointment to his position. Cepeda's absence could signal disagreement with the new administration's policies or reflect broader factional divisions within the political landscape. The move may influence the dynamics of power and cooperation among different political groups in Colombia.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on a political decision without taking a stance or emphasizing one side over another.

Why factuality (75): The article mentions Iván Cepeda’s refusal to attend Abelardo de la Espriella’s inauguration but does not provide specific details from the primary source document. The primary source focuses on Álvaro Uribe’s comments about the Senate presidency and his relationship with the Centro Democrático. Whi

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information neutrally, stating Cepeda’s decision without apparent bias or emotional language. It avoids taking sides or editorializing, maintaining a balanced tone.

SemanaIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 608 days ago

Federico Gutiérrez, alcalde de Medellín, respondió públicamente al presidente Gustavo Petro después de que este último afirmara haber cumplido con su promesa de respetar a la oposición. Petro mencionó específicamente su compromiso con Álvaro Uribe Vélez y destacó el traslado de su hermano a una guarnición militar. Sin embargo, Gutiérrez cuestionó esta postura, argumentando que las acciones del gobierno han mostrado falta de respeto hacia la oposición. Se refirió al 'Tarimazo', un evento en el que Petro se encontró con líderes de grupos criminales, describiéndolo como una grave ofensa. Gutiérrez criticó abiertamente a Petro por lo que considera insultos y mentiras constantes durante su mandato.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the criticism of President Petro as politically motivated and highlights actions by his administration that are perceived as disrespectful to opposition figures. The tone suggests skepticism towards Petro’s claims of respecting the opposition, implying a right-leaning perspective.

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a public exchange between President Gustavo Petro and Mayor Federico Gutiérrez regarding Petro’s comments on the opposition and the transfer of Álvaro Uribe’s brother. It references specific events like the 'Tarimazo' incident on June 21, 2025, and includes quotes from both le

Why objectivity (60): The tone leans toward portraying Petro as having failed to respect the opposition, using emotionally charged language such as 'la peor ofensa para una sociedad víctima de la mafia.' The article frames Gutiérrez’s criticism as justified while implying Petro’s actions contradict his stated principles,

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 659 days ago

The article discusses the current state of opposition in Colombia, emphasizing that opposing views are a constitutional right under Article 112 of the Constitution. It argues that this right has been increasingly undermined, leading to hostility between opposing groups rather than constructive dialogue. The piece highlights the polarization between the ruling party led by Gustavo Petro and the opposition group ADLE, noting that dissenting voices are often attacked or dismissed. It references Karol G’s letter to Petro, which was criticized from both sides, illustrating the growing hostility toward those who do not align with either faction. The author warns against viewing opposition as revenge and criticizes the 'pernicious polarization' described by political scientist Jennifer McCoy, where opposing viewpoints are seen as inherently evil. The article concludes by suggesting that the current climate fosters distrust and reduces political discourse to a zero-sum game.

Bias read (Center): While the article critiques the polarization and hostility between political factions, it does not take a clear ideological stance in favor of one side over the other. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of balanced political discourse and the dangers of extreme partisanship. The framing remains客观

Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): This piece focuses on the right to opposition and includes constitutional references. While it touches on relevant legal aspects, it uses emotionally charged language and frames the discussion in a way that may favor one political perspective over another.

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 705 days ago

Abelardo de la Espriella, a prominent figure in Colombian politics, is promoting the creation of 'Bloques de Defensa para la Seguridad Urbana,' specialized security units aimed at addressing rising crime rates such as theft and extortion in urban areas. These blocks have gained support from mayors who are aligned with De la Espriella, many of whom have been in conflict with President Gustavo Petro. While the initiative appears beneficial for local leaders seeking to address public safety concerns, especially among middle-class voters who supported the right-wing president, opposition figures like Iván Cepeda have raised alarms, suggesting these groups could evolve into paramilitary-like structures. The article discusses the potential implications of forming these security units.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—support from mayors and concerns from opposition figures—without overtly favoring one side. It provides context about the political dynamics and does not use biased language or selectively omit information.

Why factuality (65): The article discusses the 'Bloques de Defensa para la Seguridad Urbana' strategy by Abelardo de la Espriella and the involvement of mayors. It does not reference the primary source document about Álvaro Uribe’s comments regarding the Senate presidency contest or his concerns about political threats.

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral and informative, discussing political strategies and community responses without overt bias. The article presents both sides of the debate around the security blocks, including opposition concerns, maintaining a balanced perspective.

SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 709 days ago

The article discusses concerns over potential legal repercussions in the United States stemming from decisions by Colombian officials under President Gustavo Petro's administration regarding peace agreements. It highlights the possibility of U.S. authorities investigating alleged obstruction of justice if these decisions were part of corrupt exchanges involving money, political support, or protection of criminal activities. The piece features comments from U.S. attorney David Anthony Nunez, who explains how U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could apply to actions occurring abroad if they involve U.S. entities or promote illegal schemes within the U.S., including the use of American financial systems.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of legal implications without overtly favoring any political side. It provides explanations from a U.S. legal expert without taking a clear ideological stance, focusing on the legal framework rather than promoting a specific political agenda.

Why factuality (65): The article discusses legal implications of decisions made by Colombian officials related to 'paz total' and quotes an American lawyer, David Anthony Nunez, who explains potential U.S. legal consequences. While the content is based on expert opinion and aligns with general legal principles, there is

Why objectivity (70): The article presents information from an expert source without overt bias, though it frames the situation as potentially problematic for U.S. law enforcement. It remains largely neutral in tone, focusing on explaining legal risks rather than taking sides.

SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5510 days ago

The article criticizes the Colombian government for attempting to challenge the results of recent elections, comparing this behavior to past controversial actions by other leaders. It highlights concerns over alleged manipulation of data during the transition process and draws parallels to the governance of former Argentine leader Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. The piece expresses disappointment at the potential loss of a constructive opposition and warns against escalating tensions, especially amid existing challenges like violence and insecurity. It references historical figures such as Gandhi, Mandela, and Martin Luther King Jr., emphasizing peaceful resistance and democratic principles. The author calls for moving forward despite these difficulties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents criticism of the current administration but does not explicitly favor any specific political side. It uses historical comparisons and rhetorical questions to express concern over democratic processes and governance, without clearly aligning with either the ruling party or the反对派

Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 55): The article introduces Omar Bula Escobar as the new foreign minister but offers little substantive information about his background or qualifications. It lacks depth and appears more promotional than informative.

SemanaIndependentProgressiveyesterday

The Pacto Histórico, a leftist political coalition in Colombia, has declared itself in opposition to President Abelardo De La Espriella's government, which took office on July 20. While the coalition does not recognize De La Espriella as the legitimate head of state, it plans to challenge his election through judicial demands, citing alleged evidence of fraud that remains unknown to the public. In an interview with SEMANA, congressman Gabriel Becerra explained that the coalition will act as an opposition force within constitutional and institutional frameworks, such as Congress, while emphasizing the need for civic participation. The group also discussed forming an 'alternative cabinet' to monitor and critique the government's policies, offering alternative proposals and oversight. Additionally, Iván Cepeda, a prominent member of the coalition, stated he would not attend De La Espriella’s inauguration and reiterated his stance on civil disobedience.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the Pacto Histórico's plan to oppose the current government, including challenging the legitimacy of the president's election and forming an alternative governance structure. The framing emphasizes the coalition's rejection of the current administration and their commitment to a

SemanaIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Senator Iván Cepeda attended a public event in Tunja, Boyacá, supporting candidate Nicolás Cortés, who is running for mayor in upcoming atypical elections on July 26. During his speech, Cepeda urged young people to support Cortés and emphasized the importance of gaining power through politics. He reiterated that Gustavo Petro will be the main opposition leader against President Abelardo De La Espriella. Cepeda proposed that once Petro leaves the presidency, he should take over as president of the Pacto Histórico political party, a proposal expected to gain unanimous support from party members. Cepeda praised Petro’s commitment to social transformation within democracy and expressed the left’s goal of returning to executive power by 2030. He also highlighted Petro’s 'radical humanism' and his role in addressing poverty, while stating he would adopt a stance of 'civil disobedience' toward De La Espriella’s administration.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Iván Cepeda's endorsement of Gustavo Petro and the Pacto Histórico as a strategic move to maintain leftist influence in Colombian politics. The language used emphasizes Petro's leadership, 'radical humanism,' and the need for social transformation, which aligns with progressive or

La Silla VacíaIndependentCenteryesterday

The article discusses ongoing tensions between the Uribe movement and the government of De la Espriella over the presidency of the Colombian Senate. The Centro Democrático party criticized Interior Minister Rodrigo Lara after he publicly supported Alfredo Deluque, a candidate from La U, for the Senate presidency. The Centro Democrático argued that as the largest governing party, they deserve the position, while the government backs Deluque, who has fewer seats but enjoys support from other parties. The dispute reflects broader political tensions from the presidential campaign, where De la Espriella defeated the Uribe faction. Deluque currently holds a numerical advantage but faces uncertainty as some parties have yet to commit their support.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the conflict without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes quotes from both the Centro Democrático and the government, providing context on the political dynamics and arguments from each side. There is no clear editorializing or biased language that til츠

El EspectadorIndependentProgressive2 days ago

Iván Cepeda, un político colombiano, declaró públicamente que no asistirá a la ceremonia de posesión del presidente electo Abelardo de la Espriella el 7 de agosto. Esta declaración refleja una postura política personal y potencialmente crítica hacia el nuevo mandatario. La noticia fue reportada por El Espectador, un periódico colombiano con influencia en temas políticos y sociales del país. No se proporcionaron detalles adicionales sobre las razones específicas de la ausencia de Cepeda ni sobre la reacción oficial del gobierno o partidos involucrados.

Bias read (Progressive): La noticia presenta una declaración de un político que se abstiene de participar en una ceremonia oficial relacionada con el ascenso al poder de otro líder político. Esto puede interpretarse como una señal de desacuerdo o distanciamiento, lo cual suele estar asociado con posiciones más progresistas.