Convicted son of Anđeo Marić, confessed to savage attack on delivery men in Zagreb: "I repent... "

A 22-year-old man, identified as G. D., has been sentenced to two years and eight months in prison for a violent attack on delivery drivers in Zagreb last December. The court in Zagreb ruled that the sentence was partially conditional, with eight months of mandatory incarceration and the remaining two years suspended for five years. The verdict, however, has been deemed invalid by some legal experts, according to reports. G. D., the son of singer Andja Marić, admitted guilt during his trial at the Municipal Criminal Court in Zagreb for four criminal acts, damaging property, robbery, and two instances of violent behavior. One of these incidents occurred while he was under the influence of alcohol, which he acknowledged during the proceedings. He expressed regret for his actions and stated he feels remorseful. The court ordered G. D. to serve less than a month in prison after accounting for the time already spent in investigative detention from December 7, 2023, to July 2, 2024. If he does not commit another crime within the five-year probation period, he will avoid serving the remaining two years of his sentence. In addition to the prison term, the court mandated compulsory treatment for alcohol dependence under the supervision of the probation office, which can last up to three years. G. D. must also pay 600 euros in compensation to a company based in Varazdin that he damaged during the incident. During the trial, G. D. claimed he was angry with drivers he believed were speeding and that he was highly aggressive at the time of the attack. Two of the victims are foreign nationals working as Glovo delivery drivers. According to court documents, G. D. initially denied the charges before admitting responsibility. The case has drawn attention due to both the severity of the crimes and the high-profile nature of the defendant’s family. Andja Marić, a well-known Croatian singer, has not publicly commented on her son's sentencing, though she has reportedly expressed concern over his health and future. G. D. mentioned during the trial that he wishes to help his ill mother and resume a normal life, including finding employment. Legal experts have questioned the validity of the sentence, suggesting that the court may have erred in its assessment of the circumstances surrounding the attack. Some argue that the mandatory treatment for alcohol dependency should have been considered more heavily in determining the appropriate punishment. Others believe the conditional aspect of the sentence provides sufficient deterrence while allowing for rehabilitation. The incident itself took place in Rudeš, a neighborhood in Zagreb, where G. D. allegedly attacked the delivery drivers. Details of the attack remain largely unpublicized, but witnesses described it as chaotic and involving physical violence. The attackers were reportedly intoxicated and showed signs of aggression toward the victims. Authorities have emphasized the importance of addressing alcohol-related offenses and ensuring public safety. Probation officers will monitor G. D.’s compliance with the court’s conditions, including attending mandatory treatment sessions and avoiding further criminal activity. His case highlights ongoing concerns about youth crime and substance abuse in urban areas. The court’s decision reflects a balance between punitive measures and opportunities for reform. While the mandatory portion of the sentence ensures accountability, the conditional release allows for personal growth and societal reintegration. As the case moves forward, the focus will remain on whether G. D. adheres to the terms set by the court and avoids repeating past mistakes.