ON
← Back to feed
Order from disorder: do we need a new law of physics?
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Order from disorder: do we need a new law of physics?

The article discusses a new scientific perspective proposed by mineralogist Robert Hazen and planetary scientist Michael Wong in their book 'Time’s Second Arrow: Evolution, Order, and a New Law of Nature.' They challenge the traditional view of the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy (disorder) in an isolated system tends to increase over time. Instead, they propose a complementary principle that explains how order can emerge from disorder in various natural processes, including the formation of elements, chemical compounds, and even the evolution of life. The authors argue that this 'second arrow of time' reflects a universal tendency toward increasing organization in both biological and non-biological systems, provided certain conditions are met. While acknowledging the validity of the existing second law, they suggest that recognizing this new principle could lead to a deeper understanding of complexity in nature.

Advertisement

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Nature News logoNature NewsIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 807 days ago
Order from disorder: do we need a new law of physics?

The article discusses a new scientific perspective proposed by mineralogist Robert Hazen and planetary scientist Michael Wong in their book 'Time’s Second Arrow: Evolution, Order, and a New Law of Nature.' They challenge the traditional view of the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy (disorder) in an isolated system tends to increase over time. Instead, they propose a complementary principle that explains how order can emerge from disorder in various natural processes, including the formation of elements, chemical compounds, and even the evolution of life. The authors argue that this 'second arrow of time' reflects a universal tendency toward increasing organization in both biological and non-biological systems, provided certain conditions are met. While acknowledging the validity of the existing second law, they suggest that recognizing this new principle could lead to a deeper understanding of complexity in nature.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a scientific debate about a theoretical framework in physics and biology, rather than taking a clear ideological stance. It does not favor any particular political agenda or ideology, nor does it present evidence that leans strongly toward either side of a political spectrum. It

Why factuality (75): The article discusses the book 'Time’s Second Arrow' and presents the authors' argument that there may be an additional law of nature governing the emergence of order. While it does not provide direct evidence or experimental results, it accurately summarizes the authors' thesis based on the content

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the authors' arguments without overt bias. It uses descriptive language to explain the concept but avoids emotionally charged or subjective language. The focus remains on explaining the scientific ideas rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories