Warning from the United States: Vučić is just a puppet so that the Chinese Communists in Europe can make robots
Serbian President Aleksander Vučić visited a factory producing humanoid robots in Šabac, owned by the company Mint. The visit was highlighted by American Republican congressman Joe Wilson, who criticized Vučić for allegedly serving as a puppet for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), enabling China's technological influence in Europe. Wilson accused Vučić of planning a state funeral for war criminal Ratko Mladić, comparing it to Germany honoring Adolf Hitler. Wilson has previously introduced a legislative proposal called 'Serbia,' urging the US government to increase pressure on Serbia’s ruling regime, including sanctions and travel bans for individuals undermining stability in Western Balkan countries.
On September 7, 2026, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić was accused by U.S. Congressman Joe Wilson of being a “puppet” for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), enabling Beijing’s expansion of robotic technology in Europe. Wilson claimed that the CCP uses Vučić to establish a foothold in Europe and that this undermines American interests. He called for the rejection of Chinese communist technology, stating, “The Chinese Communist Party is building robots through their Serbian puppet Vucic. This is the CCP beachhead in Europe and runs counter to American interests. Chinese communist technology must be rejected!” This accusation came shortly after Wilson criticized Vučić for planning a state funeral for war criminal Ratko Mladić, whom he described as “nepredstavljivo”, meaning “unthinkable”, for receiving such honors. Wilson compared the situation to how Germany might honor Adolf Hitler, emphasizing the gravity of the issue. Earlier, Vučić had been sharply criticized for his intentions to organize a state funeral for Mladić, who was convicted of genocide and war crimes during the Bosnian War. The controversy led to condemnation in the region, with some officials expressing concern over the symbolic implications of honoring a war criminal. Meanwhile, Mladić’s funeral proceeded as planned in Belgrade. Thousands gathered at the Church of Saint Luke in the city neighborhood of Vidikovac, waiting in long lines to pay their respects. His body was brought back to Serbia from The Hague, where he died on August 27, 2026, at age 85, after serving a life sentence for war crimes and genocide. According to reports, Mladić had suffered from poor health in his final years, including multiple strokes and heart attacks, and his family had repeatedly requested better medical care in Serbia. At the funeral, Mladić’s son, Darko, urged mourners to attend in large numbers and “dostojanstveno pospremiti na zadnjo pot,” which translates to “honourably escort him on his last journey.” His family has previously criticized the conditions of his treatment in The Hague, claiming inadequate medical care. Serbian Prime Minister Nenad Vujić mentioned that Mladić could have been buried with the highest state honors in Serbia, but this sparked regional backlash. Vučić himself did not attend the funeral, citing an official visit to Uzbekistan. His son, Danilo Vučić, attended, along with Russian Ambassador Alexander Bocan-Harčenko. The funeral included a religious service at the Church of Saint Luke, led by Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church. After the ceremony, Mladić’s remains were taken to the Topčider Cemetery, where he will be laid to rest beside his daughter Ana. Security forces escorted the casket, followed by a military salute and speeches. European Commission Vice-President Marta Kos canceled her visit to Serbia, condemning the glorification of Mladić’s death. She stated, “The return of his remains to Belgrade reminds us of the darkest pages of our recent history. The glorification accompanying his death does not align with the values upon which our path to the EU is built.” In Belgrade, tensions remained high, with police reporting heavy traffic due to the large crowd. Some citizens expressed solidarity with the mourning process, even as political figures debated the implications of the funeral. Football legend Dragan Bogavčić, once a player for Red Star Belgrade, also attended, having recently converted to religion and grown a long beard, making him unrecognizable to many passersby. As the funeral concluded, the focus shifted to the broader implications of Mladić’s legacy and the political dynamics surrounding his burial. While the event drew widespread attention, the accusations against Vučić and the role of external powers remain unresolved, leaving room for further debate and scrutiny.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Serbian President Aleksander Vučić visited a factory producing humanoid robots in Šabac, owned by the company Mint. The visit was highlighted by American Republican congressman Joe Wilson, who criticized Vučić for allegedly serving as a puppet for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), enabling China's technological influence in Europe. Wilson accused Vučić of planning a state funeral for war criminal Ratko Mladić, comparing it to Germany honoring Adolf Hitler. Wilson has previously introduced a legislative proposal called 'Serbia,' urging the US government to increase pressure on Serbia’s ruling regime, including sanctions and travel bans for individuals undermining stability in Western Balkan countries.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Vučić as a puppet of the Chinese Communist Party, using strong language like 'puppet' and 'beachhead in Europe.' It emphasizes Wilson's criticism of Vučić's actions and aligns with his stance against Chinese influence, suggesting a pro-Western, anti-China perspective. The framing,
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Congressman Joe Wilson's public statements regarding alleged Chinese influence through Serbia's leadership under Aleksandar Vučić. It references specific actions by Vučić, such as planning a state funeral for Ratko Mladić, and mentions Wilson's previous criticism. While these
Why objectivity (40): The article presents Wilson's statements in a highly charged and emotionally charged manner, using terms like 'marionette' and 'puppet,' which imply a strong political bias. The language suggests a clear anti-Chinese and pro-American stance, with little attempt to present alternative viewpoints or c
V Srbiji se v nedeljo, 7. septembra 2026, potekal pomembni pogreb ex-generala Ratka Mladića, ki je bil obsojen za vojne zločine in genocid med vojno v Bosni in Hercegovini. Pogreb je potekal na pokopališču Topčider, kjer so ga pokopali ob njegovi hčeri Ani. Pred tem je potekel obred v cerkvi svetega Luke v Vidikovcu, kjer so se priklonili tisoče ljudi. Srbski predsednik Aleksandar Vučić ni udeležil pogreba zaradi uradnega obiska v Srbiji, medtem ko je srbski minister za pravosodje Nenad Vujić izrazil željo, da bi ga pokopali z najvišjimi državnimi častmi. Mladić je umrl v Haagu, kjer je prestajal dosmrtno zaporno kazen zaradi svojih zločinov.
Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje dogodek, ki je politično narekovati, vendar ne uporablja enstranih besed ali podrobno izpostavlja politične stališča. Poudarek je na dejstvih in kontekstu, ne pa na političnem stališču. Pogreb Mladića je politično pomembna tema, vendar artikel ne izpostavlja enstranih političnih stål
BH Telecom, bosanski telekomunikacijski operator, je prekinil predvajanje programov Radiotelevizije Republike Srbske (RTRS) med posebnim programom o pogrebu Ratka Mladića, obsojenega za genocid in druge vojne zločince. V sporočilu so objavili, da prekiniti distribucijo signala zaradi možnega neposrednega ali posrednega poveličevanja obsojenih vojnih zločinca ter škodovanja javnemu interesu in čustvom žrtev. Prekiniti so tudi signal Alternativni televiziji. Na pogrebu so napovedali udeležbo politični igrači, med drugimi Milorad Dodik in Draško Stanivuković. Pogreb je napovedan za 12. ure na beograjskem pokopališču Topčider.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel podčrtava pravno in etično občutljivo naravo pogreba Ratka Mladića, kar je politično narekovano. Spletna stran uporablja formalno in resno besedilo, ki podpira pravno in moralno stališče proti vojnim zločincem. Prav tako se osredotoča na vpliv takšnih vsebin na javni interes in čustva žrtev,
Ratko Mladić, obsojen za genocid in vojne zločine v Bosni in Hercegovini, je umrl med prestajanjem dosmrtne zaporne kazni v Haagu. Danes bo v Beogradu potekal njegov pogreb, kjer ga bodo pokopali ob svoji hčerki Ani. Več tisoč ljudi se je zbralo pred cerkvijo svetega Luke, da bi izkazali spoštovanje Mladiću. Evropska komisarka Marta Kos je odpovedala obisk v Srbiji zaradi poveličevanja smrti vojnega zločinca, medtem ko je predsednik Srbije Aleksandar Vučić opisal njen komentar kot 'kratko, a neumno'.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the event with strong emphasis on the large crowd honoring a war criminal, highlights the absence of high-profile European officials due to criticism of Serbia’s stance, and quotes Serbian officials defending the honor given to Mladić. The tone suggests approval of the ceremony, a
Ratko Mladić, vojni zločinec, ki je bil zaradi genocida v Srebrenici obsojen na dosmrten zapor, je umrl v Haagu, star 84 let. Danes se v Beogradu odvija njegov pogreb, kjer se zbirajo velike skupine ljudi, vključno z Danilom Vučićem, sinom srbskega predsednika, in ruskim veleposlanikom. Pogreb je potekal mirno, s podporo tudi nekdanjih sportskih igralcev, medtem ko so ceste v Beogradu bile zaradi pogreba ovirane. Mladić je preživel zadnje leta v slabem zdravstvenem stanju, s več možganskimi kapami, in njegova družina je zahtevala njegovo premesto v Srbijo za zdravljenje.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of Mladić's funeral, highlighting the involvement of political figures like Vučić's son and the Russian ambassador, which could suggest a political angle. However, the tone remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather than taking a clear ideological slt
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.