This opinion piece commemorates the 10th anniversary of the 2016 Arbitral Award, which ruled in favor of the Philippines in the South China Sea dispute. The author explains that the award invalidated China's 'nine-dash line' claims under international law and established that none of the Spratly Islands qualify for exclusive economic zones due to lack of habitation. The article argues that the Philippines retains sovereignty over its 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone in the West Philippine Sea. The author criticizes former President Rodrigo Duterte's 2017 public statement that he was 'setting aside' the arbitral award, arguing that such a declaration could legally abandon the ruling. The Department of Foreign Affairs quickly corrected the misinterpretation, clarifying that Duterte intended to 'put aside' the award temporarily rather than abandon it.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Arbitral Award as a significant legal victory for the Philippines and criticizes Duterte's public statements as potentially undermining the ruling. While the content is factual, the emphasis on the legal implications of Duterte's remarks and the defense of the arbitration's合法性
![[OPINION] The Arbitral Award is forever, unless…](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.rappler.com%2Ftachyon%2F2026%2F07%2FThe-Arbitral-Award-is-forever-unless.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)





