ON
← Back to feed
Opinion: New billing codes likely to raise maternity care costs
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Opinion: New billing codes likely to raise maternity care costs

The article discusses proposed changes to the billing codes for maternity care services in the United States, which are expected to increase the cost of childbirth without necessarily improving maternity outcomes. The American Medical Association (AMA), following recommendations from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, plans to replace global payment codes—used for delivering care after birth—with fee-for-service codes that cover prenatal and postpartum visits, fetal monitoring, and other procedures. Global payment codes, introduced in the 1990s, have not significantly improved maternity care, despite rising cesarean section rates from 22.9% in 2000 to 32.5% in 2025. The U.S. continues to have the highest maternity mortality and severe maternal morbidity rates among wealthy nations. Critics argue that the shift to fee-for-service billing could lead to higher costs without clear evidence of better outcomes, while proponents suggest it may improve transparency and allow for better tracking of care through electronic medical records. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will determine the relative payment rates for the new codes, though the AMA claims the move

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (11)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

STAT News logoSTAT NewsIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Opinion: Good riddance to bundled ‘global’ maternal care billing

An opinion piece discusses an upcoming change in how obstetricians bill for maternity care services in the United States. Beginning January 1, 2027, the billing system will transition from a bundled 'global obstetric payment' to a fee-for-service model. This change aims to improve transparency by separating charges for prenatal visits, labor and delivery, and postpartum care. Currently, the bundled system leads to confusion for patients and clinicians due to unclear cost-sharing arrangements, with 93% of health insurance plans not requiring copayments for preventive services like prenatal care. The new system will eliminate copayments for prenatal visits and screenings but retain them for procedures like ultrasounds and labor. While the change is intended to enhance transparency and data collection for maternal health outcomes, critics argue it could lead to increased costs for certain services.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the change in billing practices as a neutral reform aimed at improving transparency and data collection for maternal health. While it highlights potential challenges such as increased costs for specific services, it does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize partisan,

STAT News logoSTAT NewsIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Opinion: New billing codes likely to raise maternity care costs

The article discusses proposed changes to the billing codes for maternity care services in the United States, which are expected to increase the cost of childbirth without necessarily improving maternity outcomes. The American Medical Association (AMA), following recommendations from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, plans to replace global payment codes—used for delivering care after birth—with fee-for-service codes that cover prenatal and postpartum visits, fetal monitoring, and other procedures. Global payment codes, introduced in the 1990s, have not significantly improved maternity care, despite rising cesarean section rates from 22.9% in 2000 to 32.5% in 2025. The U.S. continues to have the highest maternity mortality and severe maternal morbidity rates among wealthy nations. Critics argue that the shift to fee-for-service billing could lead to higher costs without clear evidence of better outcomes, while proponents suggest it may improve transparency and allow for better tracking of care through electronic medical records. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will determine the relative payment rates for the new codes, though the AMA claims the move

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the potential impacts of the new billing code changes, discussing both the financial concerns and possible benefits. It cites data from multiple sources, including the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and health organizations, without overtly favoring one立场

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories