ON
← Back to feed
Only threat, not ‘hitman,’ matters in VP Senate trial – prosecutor
PH🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservativenow

Only threat, not ‘hitman,’ matters in VP Senate trial – prosecutor

In a Senate impeachment trial against Vice President Sara Duterte, prosecutors emphasized that identifying the alleged 'hitman' mentioned in her controversial remarks is not a prerequisite for the trial. Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong, a House prosecution spokesperson, clarified that the trial focuses on determining Duterte's fitness and accountability in office under Article 4 of the impeachment charges, which accuse her of betraying public trust through her public statements. He noted that the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)'s ongoing probe into the identity of the individual Duterte allegedly discussed is a separate legal matter. Adiong stated that the NBI's ability to identify the person is not relevant to the impeachment proceedings, which aim to assess Duterte's conduct rather than establish criminal guilt. He warned that the NBI might only confirm the identity of the individual after the Senate trial concludes.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentConservativenow
Padilla told: Prosec’s task is push case, be shocked if we defend the VP

During the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, Senator-judge Robinhood Padilla urged the prosecution to avoid being 'one-sided.' However, prosecutors Gerville Luistro and Lorna Kapunan emphasized that their role is to present evidence against Duterte, with the defense tasked with proving her innocence. Luistro stated that it would be shocking if the prosecution chose neutrality or defended Duterte, highlighting the adversarial nature of the trial. Padilla criticized the prosecution for disrupting his remarks, though the prosecutors acknowledged the emotional responses typical in legal proceedings.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the prosecution's role as inherently biased toward the accused, implying that neutrality is unexpected and undesirable. Prosecutors explicitly state that their duty is to build a case against Duterte, reinforcing a right-leaning perspective that emphasizes accountability and the '

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow
Only threat, not ‘hitman,’ matters in VP Senate trial – prosecutor

In a Senate impeachment trial against Vice President Sara Duterte, prosecutors emphasized that identifying the alleged 'hitman' mentioned in her controversial remarks is not a prerequisite for the trial. Rep. Zia Alonto Adiong, a House prosecution spokesperson, clarified that the trial focuses on determining Duterte's fitness and accountability in office under Article 4 of the impeachment charges, which accuse her of betraying public trust through her public statements. He noted that the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)'s ongoing probe into the identity of the individual Duterte allegedly discussed is a separate legal matter. Adiong stated that the NBI's ability to identify the person is not relevant to the impeachment proceedings, which aim to assess Duterte's conduct rather than establish criminal guilt. He warned that the NBI might only confirm the identity of the individual after the Senate trial concludes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced perspective by quoting the prosecution's stance without overtly criticizing or praising the accused. It explains both the impeachment process and the NBI's separate investigation, avoiding biased language or selective emphasis. The framing remains neutral, focusing on

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow
Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial: Article IV highlights

The House prosecution panel has finished presenting Article IV of the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte, accusing her of making grave threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez. The presentation took place over nine days, though the court only spent six days directly addressing Article IV due to procedural delays. Duterte did not attend the first day of the trial, relying solely on her legal team to represent her. On the second day, Duterte unexpectedly arrived at the Senate but did not participate in the trial itself, instead meeting with her lawyers and delivering a defiant statement to reporters. The prosecution cited a November 2024 press conference where Duterte allegedly revealed a 'kill plot,' and presented forensic evidence from the NBI to authenticate video footage.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the impeachment proceedings, detailing both the prosecution's arguments and Duterte's absence and actions. It includes direct quotes from both sides and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing.

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenter8 hr. ago
FACT CHECK: Video of VP Sara arguing with Escudero over impeachment is AI-generated

An AI-generated video falsely claims that Vice President Sara Duterte argued with Senator Francis 'Chiz' Escudero during her impeachment trial. The video, shared on Facebook by the page 'Kapampatut', shows Duterte responding to accusations of avoiding the trial, with dialogue suggesting personal conflict. Multiple AI detection tools, including DetectVideo AI and Hive Detect, flagged the video as highly likely AI-generated, with probabilities ranging from 64% to 99.6%. The video lacks any disclaimer indicating it is AI-created. Official records confirm that Duterte did not attend the impeachment proceedings in person, and Escudero, acting as presiding officer, has been overseeing the trial since July 6. The impeachment process is ongoing, with Duterte represented by her legal team.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual correction regarding an AI-generated video, without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It provides evidence from AI detection tools and official records, maintaining neutrality in its presentation of the issue.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories