Approximately one year after the signing of a U.S.-brokered peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda, tensions remain high in the volatile eastern region of the DRC. The agreement, signed in June 2025 under the mediation of then-U.S. President Donald Trump, aimed to bring an end to years of conflict in the area, which has seen persistent clashes involving government forces, rebel groups, and foreign actors. However, local residents and officials from both nations suggest that the deal has failed to deliver on its promises, leaving the situation largely unchanged.
According to Patrick Muyaya, the DRC’s Minister of Communications and government spokesperson, the lack of progress in implementing the peace agreement can be attributed to the actions of Rwandan President Paul Kagame. In an interview with France 24, Muyaya claimed that Rwanda has never shown genuine intent to abide by the terms of the agreement. He specifically criticized the Rwandan government for conducting military offensives that have disrupted the peace process. Muyaya argued that Rwanda’s actions indicate a deliberate strategy to occupy parts of the DRC using force rather than diplomacy.
Olivier Nduhungirehe, Rwanda’s Foreign Minister, countered these accusations during a separate interview with France 24. He expressed disappointment over what he described as increasing bias in U.S. mediation efforts. Nduhungirehe accused the United States of imposing sanctions solely on Rwanda while failing to hold the DRC accountable for its obligations under the 2025 Washington Accords. He emphasized that the agreement required both sides to implement a ceasefire and disarm the FDLR, a militia that Rwanda claims is responsible for genocide. Nduhungirehe alleged that the DRC has instead supplied the FDLR with weapons, undermining the peace process.
The dispute over the FDLR has become a central point of contention between the two nations. According to Nduhungirehe, the DRC has not taken effective measures to neutralize this group, despite having committed to doing so under the agreement. He further accused the DRC government of supporting the FDLR militarily and politically, which he described as a contradiction given the international community’s focus on sanctions against Rwanda. Meanwhile, Muyaya denied these claims, calling them a false pretext and asserting that Rwanda has a deliberate plan to occupy DRC territory through violence.
Residents of Goma, a city in eastern DRC controlled by the M23 rebel group, have expressed deep frustration with the ongoing instability. Many believe that the peace agreement has done little to improve their living conditions. Delphin Kulongwa, a local resident, stated that initial optimism following the signing of the agreement quickly faded as violence continued unabated. Similarly, Elysé Gisanagabo noted that despite the formal commitment to peace, there has been no visible change in the security situation or the well-being of civilians.
Political analysts have also weighed in on the stalled implementation of the agreement. Jacinthe Maarifa, an independent analyst, suggested that a fundamental lack of trust between the DRC and Rwanda has hindered the peace process. He pointed out that shortly after the agreement was signed, both sides began interpreting its provisions in ways that favored their respective interests, leading to continued hostility and distrust. Maarifa added that the involvement of external mediators, particularly the United States, has further complicated matters, especially when sanctions were imposed on one party without addressing the other’s shortcomings.
The situation has also drawn attention from international bodies. On June 26, the DRC filed a case against Rwanda at the International Court of Justice, accusing it of conducting a genocidal campaign since 1996. Rwanda’s Foreign Minister dismissed this action as a political maneuver, suggesting that the DRC is attempting to deflect blame onto Rwanda while continuing to support the FDLR. He also accused the DRC government of inciting hatred against Congolese Tutsis, citing incidents where such individuals were lynched and burned.
With the peace agreement showing few signs of success, the future of the region remains uncertain. Both the DRC and Rwanda face mounting pressure to resolve their differences, yet the absence of mutual trust and the influence of external factors complicate any prospects for lasting peace. As residents of eastern DRC continue to endure the consequences of prolonged conflict, the hope for a stable and secure future appears distant, with the promise of peace remaining just that—a promise.
4 reports
AfricanewsIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 757 days agoOne year after the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict in eastern DRC, residents report that violence and instability persist. The agreement, mediated by former U.S. President Donald Trump, was expected to bring stability to the mineral-rich region, but areas like Goma remain under the control of the M23 rebel group, with ongoing clashes between government forces, rebels, and other armed groups. Local residents express disappointment, stating that the peace deal has failed to deliver tangible improvements. Independent analysts suggest that a lack of trust between the involved parties and actions taken by mediators, such as sanctions, undermined the agreement from the start. As a result, the conflict continues to displace people and worsen the humanitarian crisis in the region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the situation, highlighting the perspectives of local residents, independent analysts, and the broader context of the conflict. It does not favor one side over the other and focuses on the failure of the peace agreement rather than attributing blame to any one
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): This article offers a more neutral overview of the situation, citing local perspectives and an independent analyst. It avoids taking sides and provides a broader picture of the ongoing conflict and challenges in implementing the peace agreement.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 88Objective 687 days agoThe head of Rwanda's diplomacy, Olivier Nduhungirehe, criticized the United States for what he called 'increasingly blatant partiality' in imposing sanctions solely against Rwanda while ignoring similar actions by Kinshasa. He accused the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) of failing to implement a peace agreement signed in June 2025, which aimed to disarm the FDLR armed group. Nduhungirehe claimed that DRC has instead strengthened these groups politically and militarily, and questioned why the U.S. targets only Rwanda. He also rejected claims by the DRC that Rwanda is conducting a genocide since 1996, calling such accusations cynical and politically motivated, and alleged that President Felix Tshisekedi and his military collaborate with the FDLR and incite hatred against Congolese Tutsis.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of U.S. sanctions as a justified response to perceived double standards, emphasizing Rwanda's perspective and questioning U.S. impartiality. It highlights Rwanda's diplomatic stance and accuses the DRC of hypocrisy, aligning more closely with narratives that support,
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 68): The article closely matches the content of the first one, providing detailed quotes from the Rwandan foreign minister. It includes additional context about the accusations of genocide and the presence of Rwandan troops. The tone remains biased in favor of Rwanda.
France 24 (English)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 707 days ago DR Congo conflict: Rwandan FM 'disappointed by increasingly biased US mediation'Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe criticized U.S. mediation in the conflict with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), calling it 'increasingly biased.' He argued that the U.S. imposed sanctions solely on Rwanda while the DRC failed to uphold commitments under the 2025 Washington Accords, including a ceasefire and disarming the FDLR militia, which Rwanda labels as genocidal. Nduhungirehe highlighted that the DRC continues to supply weapons to the FDLR and cited civilian casualties, including the death of French UNICEF worker Karine Buisset. He rejected the DRC’s recent legal action against Rwanda at the International Court of Justice, calling it a 'political maneuver' and emphasizing that peace requires mutual compliance with the agreement.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict through Rwanda's perspective, highlighting perceived U.S. bias and diplomatic pressure. The emphasis on the DRC's alleged failure to honor agreements and the dismissal of the ICJ case as a 'political maneuver' suggests a sympathetic stance toward Rwanda. While the DRC
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article presents specific claims about the US mediation being biased and Rwanda's accusations against the DRC regarding the FDLR. These align with statements made in other articles. However, some details like the exact number of casualties or the timeline of events may not be fully corroborated.
France 24 (Français)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 80Objective 656 days ago Muyaya: Peace deal not moving forward 'because of Kagamé's actions'In an interview with France 24, Patrick Muyaya, the Minister of Communication and spokesperson for the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) government, accused the Rwandan government of undermining the peace agreement signed one year ago. He stated that Rwanda has 'never truly had the will' to honor the pact and blamed the president's actions for the lack of progress, particularly in security implementation. Muyaya claimed that Rwanda has conducted military offensives that disrupted the peace process. In contrast, Rwanda’s Foreign Minister, Olivier Nduhungirehe, accused Kinshasa of strengthening the FDLR, a rebel group the DRC had committed to disarming. Muyaya dismissed these claims as a deliberate strategy by Rwanda to occupy Congolese territory through violence.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as stemming from Rwanda's alleged aggression against the DRC, emphasizing accusations from the DRC side while presenting Rwanda's counterclaims as dismissive. The language used to describe Rwanda's actions (e.g., 'agissements', 'violence') carries a critical tone, and
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): This article provides similar information to others but focuses more on the Congolese perspective. It accurately reflects the dispute over the implementation of the peace agreement but leans toward the Congolese viewpoint, showing some bias.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
France
