ON
← Back to feed
Ombudsman dismisses complaints vs UP officials over DiliMall
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 hr. ago

Ombudsman dismisses complaints vs UP officials over DiliMall

The Office of the Ombudsman in the Philippines dismissed graft and administrative complaints against current and former University of the Philippines (UP) officials regarding the DiliMall development project on the UP Diliman campus. The complainants alleged that UP officials failed to consult stakeholders and imposed higher rental rates through master lease agreements, violating the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. However, the Ombudsman concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, finding no proof of corrupt motives or legal violations. The ruling stated that disagreements with university decisions do not constitute criminal liability and that the contracts were legally sound. Affected stallholders were given priority in the redevelopment process.

1 reports

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenter6 hr. ago
Ombudsman dismisses complaints vs UP officials over DiliMall

The Office of the Ombudsman in the Philippines dismissed graft and administrative complaints against current and former University of the Philippines (UP) officials regarding the DiliMall development project on the UP Diliman campus. The complainants alleged that UP officials failed to consult stakeholders and imposed higher rental rates through master lease agreements, violating the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. However, the Ombudsman concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, finding no proof of corrupt motives or legal violations. The ruling stated that disagreements with university decisions do not constitute criminal liability and that the contracts were legally sound. Affected stallholders were given priority in the redevelopment process.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Ombudsman's ruling as a neutral assessment based on legal standards, without overtly criticizing or praising either side. It reports the findings of an official investigation without apparent ideological slant, focusing on the legal merits of the case rather than taking a立场.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories