Ibadan content creator denies filming Oloolu Masquerade

Vanguard NigeriaIndependentCenter20 hr. ago

A female TikTok content creator in Ibadan, Nigeria, has denied allegations that she filmed the sacred Oloolu Masquerade during the annual Oloolu Masquerade Festival. The woman, identified as Wasilat, spoke on Lagelu FM's program and claimed she did not film the revered figure nor did she die, dismissing rumors that spread on social media. She stated that she filmed a different individual, Alawo Oloolu, whom she mistakenly believed to be the actual Oloolu masquerade. Chief Adeola Oloko, spokesperson to the Olubadan of Ibadanland, confirmed that the woman had indeed mistaken Alawo for the real Oloolu masquerade and that she underwent traditional cleansing rites due to health issues following the incident. Videos circulated online showed the content creator participating in a traditional cleansing ceremony.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the content creator's denial and the official clarification from the Olubadan spokesperson, providing balanced perspectives without evident bias toward either side. There is no overtly loaded language or one-sided sourcing.

The PunchIndependentCenter22 hr. ago

A female TikToker involved in a controversy over the Oloolu Masquerade Festival in Ibadan, Oyo State, has denied claims that she filmed the sacred Oloolu masquerade or died as rumors suggested. Speaking on Lagelu FM, the woman, known as Wasilat, explained that she inadvertently filmed Alawo Oloolu, a figure associated with the tradition, rather than the main Oloolu masquerade. She stated she did not record the revered figure and faced backlash after posting the video on social media. The Olubadan of Ibadanland, Chief Adeola Oloko, clarified that the woman mistakenly captured Alawo Oloolu and that her family sought traditional remedies after she experienced unusual symptoms. The incident highlights tensions between modern practices and traditional customs within the community.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the TikToker's denial and the traditional authority's explanation. It does not overtly favor either side, maintaining a balanced approach by quoting both parties without evident ideological slant.