Arvind Kejriwal, the national convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), visited the Jantar Mantar protest site in New Delhi on Thursday to show support for Sonam Wangchuk, an activist engaged in an indefinite hunger strike. Kejriwal praised Wangchuk as a prominent educationist and highlighted his past participation in hunger strikes for the benefit of students in Ladakh. During his visit, Kejriwal expressed concern over the recent leakage of NEET exam papers, which he claimed has undermined the confidence of students. He warned that the government must heed the calls of activists like Wangchuk or risk facing consequences similar to those faced by the previous administration. Kejriwal drew parallels between the current protests and the 2011 movement led by Anna Hazare, recalling how both movements had taken place at Jantar Mantar. He emphasized that the government should take the protesters' demands seriously, stating that failure to do so could lead to adverse outcomes. In a direct challenge to the ruling government, Kejriwal suggested that Prime Minister Narendra Modi might fear the potential for radical actions by Wangchuk. He also proposed Wangchuk as a candidate for the position of education minister, urging the removal of current minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The protest, organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), is centered around allegations of corruption and malpractice in the NEET examination process. Wangchuk and other activists are demanding the resignation of Pradhan due to the leaked exam papers, which they claim have created uncertainty and distress among students. Kejriwal echoed these sentiments, asserting that the leaking of such sensitive information poses a threat to the educational system and the aspirations of millions of students. He criticized the granting of bail to individuals implicated in the leaks, citing the case of a key accused in the 2024 paper leak as an example. During his address to the gathering, Kejriwal shared personal experiences related to competitive exams, including his own success in clearing the IIT entrance exam and the education of his children through the same institutions. He stressed that exams represent more than just academic assessments, they symbolize hope and opportunity for students. According to him, the integrity of these exams is crucial for maintaining trust in the educational framework. Kejriwal also called upon the government to engage in meaningful dialogue with the youth and to consider the perspectives of activists and protestors. He encouraged citizens across the nation to participate in a planned march to Parliament on July 20, which was announced by the CJP. His remarks were supported by AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj, who also urged people to join the demonstration. Bharadwaj made light of the political situation, suggesting that the BJP-led government should avoid appointing Smriti Irani as the new education minister if they intend to replace Pradhan. Meanwhile, Telangana Transport and BC Welfare Minister Ponnam Prabhakar expressed condemnation over the use of force by the police against students and youth participating in the march to Parliament. He described the incident as undemocratic and lamented the lack of response from the central government to the legitimate grievances raised by the protesters. Prabhakar pointed to the irregularities in the NEET exams as a major cause of anxiety among students and their families. He called for the resignation of the education minister, questioned the silence of Prime Minister Modi on the matter, and advocated for the withdrawal of legal cases against the protesters. Additionally, he demanded accountability for those responsible for the police action and urged the government to implement transparent reforms in the conduct of NEET examinations.
3 reports
Hindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 7016 days agoArvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), visited the Jantar Mantar protest site to show support for Sonam Wangchuk, an activist on an indefinite hunger strike demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over alleged NEET exam paper leaks. Kejriwal praised Wangchuk as a significant educationist and suggested him as a potential replacement for Pradhan. He drew parallels between Wangchuk’s protest and his own 2011 movement with Anna Hazare, warning that ignoring Wangchuk could lead to similar unrest as experienced during the UPA government. Kejriwal criticized the current administration for failing to address the issue, calling the paper leaks dangerous for students' futures and urging systemic changes to prevent student suicides.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest and Kejriwal's support for Wangchuk as a legitimate call for accountability and reform, using strong language like 'revolutionary things' and 'dangerous for the country.' It emphasizes the urgency of listening to activists and highlights criticism of the current regime
Why factuality (88): The article provides a detailed account of the detention of Rahul Gandhi and others, the ongoing protests, and legal developments involving Sonam Wangchuk. It aligns with other sources on the key events and the government's response. The information is consistent with the broader narrative.
Why objectivity (70): The article has a slightly negative tone towards the government, emphasizing the detention of leaders and the use of force. It portrays the protests as legitimate and the government's actions as dismissive.
The HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 6012 days agoTelangana Transport and BC Welfare Minister Ponnam Prabhakar condemned the police use of batons (lathi charge) against students and youth groups who marched to Parliament in Delhi on July 20, 2026, to protest the actions of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The protesters, aligned with the Cockroach Janta Party, accused the central government of using force instead of addressing their concerns over irregularities in the NEET examination. Prabhakar criticized the government's handling of the situation, called for the resignation of the education minister, and urged accountability for the police action. He emphasized the need for transparency in the NEET process and expressed disappointment in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's lack of response.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a violation of democratic principles and highlights criticism of the central government's response to student protests. The emphasis on the misuse of force by authorities and the call for governmental accountability aligns with left-leaning perspectives that often側
Why factuality (80): The article accurately details the CJP's three demands and the interactions with Health Minister JP Nadda. It provides specific information about the memorandum submission and the minister's response, aligning with other reports.
Why objectivity (60): The article presents the CJP's demands and the minister's response without overt bias. However, it emphasizes the protesters' perspective and the demands made, which could be seen as slightly favoring the CJP's stance.
The WireIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 7012 days agoA group of academics and public figures in India has issued an open letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, criticizing the government's handling of student protests and urging a more respectful approach toward demonstrators. The letter calls for an end to what they describe as 'callous disregard' of students and advocates for open dialogue with protesters. The signatories include scholars, activists, and other prominent individuals who argue that the current methods used by authorities to manage dissent are counterproductive and fail to address underlying concerns. The open letter reflects growing frustration among intellectuals and civil society members over perceived authoritarian tendencies in governance and the lack of meaningful engagement with protest movements.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism of the government's actions as a call for democratic values and respect for dissent, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize civil liberties and institutional accountability. The emphasis on 'open dialogue' and condemnation of 'callous disregard' leans
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Arvind Kejriwal's visit to the CJP protest and his support for Sonam Wangchuk. It aligns with other accounts of the protests and the political dynamics involved. The article provides context about the hunger strike and the political implications of the movement.
Why objectivity (70): The article is presented from the perspective of Kejriwal and his supporters, emphasizing their alignment with the protesters. While it remains relatively neutral, it lacks balance by not including opposing viewpoints or independent analysis of the situation.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
India
