One of the victims was fucked for more than 10,000 euros, the other one for a few thousand euros.
The Slovenian police reported two cases of online fraud involving cryptocurrency. In one case, an individual was scammed out of over 10,000 euros after being contacted by unknown perpetrators who claimed they could offer high financial returns through a crypto scheme. The fraudsters also obtained personal data from the victim. In another incident in Ajdovščina, a scammer impersonated a company representative via phone, guided the victim through a fake payout process, and convinced her to make two transactions abroad. Despite warnings from her bank and account blockage, she lost several thousand euros. Police emphasized the importance of caution with unsolicited investment offers, especially those involving cryptocurrency, and warned against sharing personal or banking information with strangers.
A woman from Piran alerted her son to a potential scam involving online fraud, preventing thousands of euros from being transferred to unknown individuals. The incident has prompted local police to investigate and issue warnings about the dangers of unsolicited offers promising quick returns. According to reports, the victim received multiple calls from foreign numbers urging her to deposit money into an account. She was convinced to proceed, but her son’s timely intervention stopped the transaction before the funds could be sent abroad. Police in Piran are currently examining the case, emphasizing how the son's prompt action helped prevent financial loss. The situation unfolded over several days, beginning with the woman receiving a suspicious online advertisement offering fast earnings. Shortly after, she began receiving frequent calls from unknown callers who insisted she invest money. These callers claimed the investment would yield substantial returns. The woman, initially skeptical, eventually decided to follow their instructions. However, she quickly realized something was wrong and called her son. His immediate response allowed the bank to block the transaction before the money reached the scammers' hands. This timely action prevented a significant financial loss. In another similar case in the northern part of Slovenia, a woman lost more than 10,000 euros through an online scam involving cryptocurrency. In this instance, the perpetrators tricked the victim into sending money to foreign accounts by posing as representatives of a legitimate company. They guided her through a fake withdrawal process, leading her to confirm two transactions. Despite warnings from the bank, which blocked her account due to detected risks, the woman still suffered a loss of several thousand euros. Meanwhile, in Ajdovščina, another case saw a woman lose around a few thousand euros after being contacted by an unknown individual pretending to be a representative of a company. He presented a story about cryptocurrency investments and led her through a fraudulent withdrawal process. Authorities have issued repeated warnings against falling for such scams, especially when dealing with unsolicited offers promising high returns. Police in Nova Gorica emphasize the importance of caution when encountering such situations, particularly when they come from unknown sources. They advise against providing personal or banking information to strangers, clicking on links from unverified sources, or allowing remote access to one’s devices. These precautions are crucial, as scammers often create the illusion of existing investments or unpaid benefits, luring victims into making transfers. In a separate case, a woman from Piran fell victim to a phishing attempt disguised as support from Microsoft. She was contacted by an unknown caller who claimed to represent Microsoft technical support. Following their instructions, she revealed sensitive security elements of her online bank account. When she noticed something was wrong, she informed her husband, who then contacted the bank. The bank employee, upon hearing about the call, advised blocking all accounts. However, the scammers had already initiated three transfers totaling approximately 73,901 euros. By the time the woman returned to the bank, the funds were gone. The woman filed a complaint against the bank, arguing that its lack of vigilance contributed to the loss. She claimed that despite her husband’s warning, the bank only blocked credit cards and did not secure her online and mobile banking accounts. She believed that a more thorough response from the bank would have prevented the theft. The bank responded by stating that the fraudsters accessed the account using the security elements provided by the customer. It argued that the customer had not clearly indicated the need for a complete account lockdown, and thus the bank could not be held fully responsible. The case was heard at the Supreme Court, where the court ruled that the bank had acted with insufficient care. While acknowledging the woman’s negligence in sharing sensitive information, the court emphasized that banks must take greater responsibility in protecting customers from such threats. The ruling cited the Law on Payment Services, Electronic Money Issuance, and Payment Systems (ZPlaSSIED), which outlines obligations for financial institutions to safeguard user data and prevent unauthorized access. The court concluded that the bank had failed to fully respond to the customer’s request for account protection, leaving her vulnerable to the fraud.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
A higher court has ruled that a bank shares responsibility for financial loss caused by fraud, awarding the victim half compensation of €36,950. The case involved a woman who lost €73,901 after being scammed via a fake call from someone impersonating Microsoft support. She followed instructions to share personal banking details, leading to unauthorized transfers. Her husband immediately requested a block on all accounts, but the bank only blocked credit cards, not online or mobile banking. The lower court had dismissed her claim, calling her actions negligent, but the higher court found the bank had acted with insufficient care. It acknowledged the bank’s failure to fully secure the account and assigned partial liability.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling without overt ideological framing. While the outcome involves a financial institution and consumer protection, there is no clear partisan angle. The focus remains on the legal interpretation of duty of care and negligence rather than political advocacy or ideology
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a court decision where a higher court ruled that the bank was partially responsible for damages caused by fraud. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles discussing the same case. The details about the amount lost (73,901 euros) and the specific actions ta
Why objectivity (78): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner but uses emotionally charged language such as 'prevare' (fraud) and describes the victim's experience in a way that emphasizes the injustice. While it does not overtly take sides, the narrative leans slightly towards portraying the bank as negligent
A woman fell victim to an online scam where she was impersonated by someone claiming to be Microsoft support. Following instructions, she provided personal security elements of her online banking account. The fraudster then transferred three amounts totaling €73,901 from her account. The bank initially blocked her cards but did not block online and mobile banking access, allowing the transfers to proceed. The woman filed a lawsuit against the bank, arguing it failed to act with sufficient care. The court ruled that the bank acted negligently and contributed to the damage. The case has been referred to the Supreme Court.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced legal analysis of the case, focusing on the responsibilities of both the victim and the bank. It does not take a clear ideological stance on financial regulation or consumer protection policies, nor does it emphasize any particular political agenda. The framing is non
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the sequence of events as described by the woman, including her interaction with the fake Microsoft support, disclosure of security elements, and the subsequent fraudulent transfers. It mentions the court ruling assigning responsibility to both the woman and the bank,
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the case from the perspective of the woman and includes her statements, which can introduce some bias. However, it also mentions the court's decision and the bank's response, providing a somewhat balanced view. There is some emotional language when describing the woman's experie
An elderly woman from Piran noticed an online scam offering quick earnings and was contacted multiple times by unknown callers urging her to invest money. She suspected something was wrong and called her son, who promptly alerted the bank, allowing them to block the transaction before the money reached the scammers. Police are now investigating the incident and warn against falling for such schemes, especially those involving strangers contacting victims over the phone.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a cybercrime incident without taking a political stance. It focuses on public safety warnings and does not frame the issue through any ideological lens. The narrative remains neutral, emphasizing the importance of vigilance rather than promoting any specific
Why factuality (80): This article describes a similar cyber fraud case where a woman from Piran was scammed by individuals claiming to offer quick profits through cryptocurrency investments. It highlights the role of her son in preventing the transaction and confirms the police are investigating. The facts are consisten
Why objectivity (85): The article uses a slightly more narrative style but remains objective in its reporting. It emphasizes the importance of being cautious with unsolicited investment offers and includes a photo caption, which is common in media but does not introduce bias.
The Slovenian police reported two cases of online fraud involving cryptocurrency. In one case, an individual was scammed out of over 10,000 euros after being contacted by unknown perpetrators who claimed they could offer high financial returns through a crypto scheme. The fraudsters also obtained personal data from the victim. In another incident in Ajdovščina, a scammer impersonated a company representative via phone, guided the victim through a fake payout process, and convinced her to make two transactions abroad. Despite warnings from her bank and account blockage, she lost several thousand euros. Police emphasized the importance of caution with unsolicited investment offers, especially those involving cryptocurrency, and warned against sharing personal or banking information with strangers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about online fraud incidents without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on practical advice and warnings from law enforcement rather than taking a partisan stance. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing public safety without promoting specific
Why factuality (75): The article reports on a cyber fraud case involving cryptocurrency, detailing the victim was scammed out of over 10,000 euros in Slovenia and another victim in Ajdovščina lost several thousand euros. It mentions police are investigating the circumstances and provides general warnings about phishing
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on reporting the incident and providing public safety advice. It avoids taking sides or expressing personal opinions, keeping the focus on factual information and preventive measures.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
