ON
← Back to feed
The Duchess's father's alleged accusations were first brought to your attention by his ex-wife?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter

The Duchess's father's alleged accusations were first brought to your attention by his ex-wife?

Police in London are investigating Thomas Markle Sr., the father of Meghan Markle, on suspicion of child abuse and possession of child pornography. According to reports citing sources close to the family, Markle’s ex-wife, Roslyn Loveless, first alerted authorities to these concerns in a letter sent to the Metropolitan Police in 2019. Although Loveless passed away in 2024, she had been married to Markle between 1964 and 1975. The investigation was initially triggered by a complaint filed by Markle’s son, who allegedly discovered compromising photos and videos at his father’s home in the Philippines and handed them over to law enforcement. While the Metropolitan Police confirmed they received the 2019 letter and informed Meghan Markle, they stated they did not conduct their own inquiry into those specific claims. Markle Sr., aged 82, has denied all allegations, describing them as lies in an interview with the Daily Mail, while his son maintains that the evidence provided to police will reveal the truth.

Thomas Markle, the estranged father of Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, has publicly admitted to paying for sexual services in the Philippines while denying all charges of child sexual abuse. In an interview with the British newspaper The Daily Mail, the 82-year-old former Hollywood lighting technician stated that he traveled to the archipelago at least twice while single and engaged in sexual relations with sex workers. He firmly rejected accusations that he possessed or created illegal imagery involving minors, describing such claims as lies designed to ruin his reputation. Markle said he has never had sexual contact with anyone under the age of eighteen and expressed willingness to submit to forensic examinations of his personal devices to prove his innocence. The revelations emerged as Philippine authorities confirmed they are actively investigating the case. A task force dedicated to combating human trafficking and child sexual exploitation is examining the allegations. The probe follows reports that Markle’s son, Thomas Markle Jr., known as Tom, discovered a collection of photographs and video files depicting child sexual abuse at their father’s former residence in the Philippines. According to accounts, the illicit materials were stored alongside ordinary family memorabilia. Tom notified local police of his findings and subsequently alerted the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation in July. The FBI has acknowledged awareness of the allegations. Markle Sr. resides in a care facility in Florida, where he is currently undergoing rehabilitation to learn how to walk again. His recovery follows the amputation of a leg during life-saving surgery performed in 2025. Citing poor health resulting from previous strokes, he stated he is physically unable to travel to the Philippines for questioning. However, he offered to cooperate with investigators and suggested that any incriminating digital evidence found on his computer was planted by others to frame him. He also clarified that books described by critics as pornographic actually relate to Hollywood history and photography. The situation has intensified scrutiny on the Metropolitan Police in London. The force admitted on Saturday that it received a letter in January 2019 containing specific allegations regarding criminal offenses committed by Markle outside the United Kingdom. At the time, officers reviewed the document and forwarded it to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for their information. The police department confirmed that the details contained in the letter were not passed on to other law enforcement agencies, including those in the United States, Mexico, or the Philippines. This admission comes amid questions about why the force held onto the claims for over seven years without further action. New reporting suggests the author of that 2019 letter was Roslyn Loveless, Markle’s first wife. Loveless, who was married to Markle from 1964 until their divorce in 1975, died in 2024. She is the mother of Markle’s current children, Samantha Markle and Thomas Markle Jr. Sources close to the family indicated that Loveless raised concerns about her ex-husband’s behavior in correspondence sent to the unit responsible for protecting members of the royal family. While the exact contents of the letter remain private, its origin adds a new dimension to the ongoing dispute within the family. Meghan Markle issued a statement on Friday expressing deep distress over the allegations. She described the claims as troubling and disturbing, stating that her thoughts are with any children who may have been harmed. The Duchess revealed that she had been informed about these issues in the past and believed they were being investigated. She explained that prior allegations contributed to her decision to sever ties with her father in 2018, the year of her marriage to Prince Harry. Meghan stated that she does not allow her father contact with their children, Archie and Lilibet, citing safety concerns. Tom Markle Jr., who is 60 years old, maintains that the evidence he submitted to police will establish the truth. He apologized to his sister for previously supporting their father during their long-standing estrangement, admitting he had protected the wrong person for nearly a decade. Samantha Markle, the couple’s eldest daughter, has sided with her father, asserting that the accusations are part of an attempt to plant false evidence. She disputes the narrative presented by her brother and stands by her father’s denial of involvement in any abusive conduct. The family dynamic has become increasingly public, with both sides engaging through media interviews. Markle Sr. characterized the accusations as a pile of lies and vowed to do whatever necessary to clear his name. He emphasized that he likes Asian women but viewed that preference as harmless. Meanwhile, Meghan reiterated that she had cut off communication with her father last year, sending him a message indicating that she and authorities were aware of alleged abuses. The letter was reportedly sent while he was hospitalized in the Philippines following his leg amputation. Philippine officials continue their inquiry into the digital materials found in Markle’s former home. One specific item mentioned in reports is a 35-millimeter photograph showing a bearded man resembling Markle in a sexual act with a young Asian girl. Markle denied appearing in such an image. As the legal and investigative processes unfold in multiple jurisdictions, the focus remains on verifying the authenticity of the digital files and determining whether any laws were violated. The Metropolitan Police has stated it is reviewing its handling of the 2019 letter, though it has not announced any new investigations into Markle himself in the UK.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 85
The Duchess's father's alleged accusations were first brought to your attention by his ex-wife?

Police in London are investigating Thomas Markle Sr., the father of Meghan Markle, on suspicion of child abuse and possession of child pornography. According to reports citing sources close to the family, Markle’s ex-wife, Roslyn Loveless, first alerted authorities to these concerns in a letter sent to the Metropolitan Police in 2019. Although Loveless passed away in 2024, she had been married to Markle between 1964 and 1975. The investigation was initially triggered by a complaint filed by Markle’s son, who allegedly discovered compromising photos and videos at his father’s home in the Philippines and handed them over to law enforcement. While the Metropolitan Police confirmed they received the 2019 letter and informed Meghan Markle, they stated they did not conduct their own inquiry into those specific claims. Markle Sr., aged 82, has denied all allegations, describing them as lies in an interview with the Daily Mail, while his son maintains that the evidence provided to police will reveal the truth.

Bias read (Center): The article covers a criminal investigation involving a private citizen, which falls under the politics category due to the involvement of law enforcement and public figures. The tone remains largely neutral and factual, relying on direct quotes from both the accused and the accuser, as well as clar

Why factuality (90): This article provides higher fidelity to the complex details of the case, specifically distinguishing between the Metropolitan Police (who received a letter from the late ex-wife Roslyn Loveless in 2019) and the current investigations by the FBI/Philippine police based on the son's recent tips. It c

Why objectivity (85): The writing style is significantly more neutral and journalistic compared to Article 0. It uses cautious language such as 'alleged,' 'reportedly,' and 'sources said' when discussing unverified claims. It balances the father's denial with the son's persistence and the mother's past actions without in

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 60
The royal family is embarrassed as Meghan's father reveals his sexual secrets.

Thomas Markle, father of Meghan Markle, has publicly admitted to paying for sexual services with prostitutes during visits to the Philippines while claiming he never engaged in relations with minors. His son, Thomas Markle Jr., alleges that he discovered photographs and videos of child sexual abuse in his father's former home in the Philippines and reported the findings to local police and the US FBI. Senior Markle denies these serious allegations, suggesting the material was planted by others, and has offered to submit his computer to forensic examination. The Metropolitan Police confirmed they received a letter detailing these claims in January 2019 but stated they did not share the information with other agencies at the time, prompting a review of their actions. Meghan Markle described herself as deeply distressed by the revelations, noting she has had no contact with her father since 2018.

Bias read (Center): The article covers a scandal involving a member of the British Royal Family, which carries some political weight due to the institution's status, but the specific content focuses on personal criminal allegations and family dynamics rather than partisan policy debates. The tone remains largely report

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the core narrative found in the cross-source consensus regarding Thomas Markle Sr.'s interview with the Daily Mail, his son's allegations, and the involvement of police agencies. It correctly identifies the timeline of events (2025 leg amputation, 2026 date) and the s

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'sexual secrets' and 'shocking scandal' in the headline and body. While it presents both sides (Markle Sr.'s denial vs. the son's accusations), the framing leans towards the dramatic aspects of the story rather than a dry, neutral report. The q

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories