COThe article discusses three distinct cases where strategic decisions led to unintended negative consequences. The first case involves Nutresa, a Colombian food company, which acquired the fast-food chain Hamburguesas El Corral before the Gilinski administration. In an attempt to improve financial results, Nutresa introduced cheaper ingredients into their burgers while keeping prices the same, expecting higher margins. However, consumers quickly noticed the drop in quality, leading to a loss of customer trust and brand damage despite later reversing the strategy. The second example focuses on FIFA’s strategy during the World Cup, which included expanding the number of teams to 48, increasing advertising opportunities under the guise of 'hydration breaks,' and supporting teams with more marketable players. This approach was criticized for diluting the tournament's competitive integrity, increasing perceived commercialization, and raising questions about fairness due to controversial officiating decisions. The third case, though briefly mentioned, refers to the 'Historical Pact' in politics, suggesting similar issues of short-term gains at the expense of long-term credibility.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a critical analysis of strategic decisions across different sectors (business, sports, and politics), highlighting the risks of prioritizing short-term gains over long-term reputation and trust. It does not exhibit overt ideological bias but rather offers a balanced critique of
