ON
← Back to feed
Number of UK millionaires falls to lowest level since 2008 financial crisis
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives26 days ago

Number of UK millionaires falls to lowest level since 2008 financial crisis

The number of millionaires in the UK fell to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, according to an index tracker by the Adam Smith Institute (ASI). This decline, which represents a 7% drop from 2024 to 442,000, is attributed to factors such as falling asset prices, high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) leaving the UK, and a low household saving rate. The ASI, a right-leaning think tank, argues that the UK needs to implement policies to attract HNWIs, including abolishing inheritance tax, phasing out capital gains tax, and reforming the non-domiciled tax regime. Critics question how the government would compensate for potential loss of revenue. While the ASI cites a trend of HNWIs leaving the UK, this has not been confirmed by HMRC data. Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith expressed concern over the departure of wealthy individuals, emphasizing the economic contributions they make.

The number of millionaires living in the UK has dropped to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, according to a report by the Adam Smith Institute (ASI). The figure stood at 442,000 millionaires in 2025, representing a 7 per cent decrease from the previous year. This marks the smallest number of ultra-high-net-worth individuals in the country since the global economic downturn began over 17 years ago. The decline is attributed to several factors, including falling asset prices adjusted for inflation, a reduced household savings rate, and the departure of high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) from the UK. The ASI’s report highlights that many HNWIs are choosing to leave the country or avoid relocating altogether, although this trend has not been officially recorded in HMRC data. Additionally, the report notes that the UK’s tax policies, such as the potential introduction of a wealth tax and the abolition of the non-domiciled (non-dom) tax regime, are contributing to the exodus. The ASI bases its findings on data from the National Office for Statistics (ONS) and applies a method known as “constant price” adjustments to account for inflation and exchange rate fluctuations. Under this system, a “constant-price sterling millionaire” is defined as someone whose combined real and financial assets exceed £1 million, encompassing property, stocks, pensions, and savings. This approach aims to provide a consistent measure of wealth over time, independent of monetary shifts. The report argues that the UK must become a more appealing destination for HNWIs to attract and retain wealth creators. To achieve this, the ASI recommends policy reforms such as abolishing inheritance tax, phasing out capital gains tax, and revising the non-dom tax regime. Such changes, the report suggests, would benefit wealthy families while raising concerns about how the government might replace lost revenues. According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), the government currently collects around £7.2 billion annually from inheritance tax, which accounts for less than one percent of total government revenue. However, projections indicate that this amount could increase to £8.5 billion by 2025–26 and potentially surpass £14.5 billion by 2030–31. This growth is driven by frozen tax thresholds, fiscal pressures, and the upcoming inclusion of pension funds in inheritance tax calculations. Economists and tax experts have expressed skepticism toward wealth taxes, pointing to examples from countries like France, Sweden, and the Netherlands, where such policies led to minimal tax collection and significant outflows of wealth. The ASI echoes these sentiments, stating that proposed wealth taxes would likely exacerbate the current trend of millionaire departures rather than address underlying issues. Andrew Griffith, the Conservative Party’s shadow secretary of state for business and trade, commented on the report, emphasizing the importance of retaining wealthy individuals who contribute to the tax base and foster job creation. He described the exodus of young and ambitious people as a “shameful sign.” However, the report did not include comments from the current government’s business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, or former officials like Peter Kyle. Mitchell Palmer, an economist at the ASI, warned that the decline in millionaires should be seen as a cautionary signal rather than a positive outcome. He noted that each departing millionaire represents a reduction in available capital for local businesses, diminished international connections, and weakened entrepreneurial activity within the economy. Palmer also criticized recent proposals for higher taxes on wealth, arguing that they would worsen the situation rather than resolve it. Instead, he advocated for policies that make the UK a more attractive environment for wealth generation and retention.

2 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7026 days ago
Number of UK millionaires falls to lowest level since 2008 financial crisis

The number of millionaires in the UK fell to its lowest level since the 2008 financial crisis, according to an index tracker by the Adam Smith Institute (ASI). This decline, which represents a 7% drop from 2024 to 442,000, is attributed to factors such as falling asset prices, high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) leaving the UK, and a low household saving rate. The ASI, a right-leaning think tank, argues that the UK needs to implement policies to attract HNWIs, including abolishing inheritance tax, phasing out capital gains tax, and reforming the non-domiciled tax regime. Critics question how the government would compensate for potential loss of revenue. While the ASI cites a trend of HNWIs leaving the UK, this has not been confirmed by HMRC data. Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith expressed concern over the departure of wealthy individuals, emphasizing the economic contributions they make.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the decline in UK millionaires as a problem requiring pro-wealth policy reforms, such as abolishing inheritance tax and phasing out capital gains tax. These proposals align with right-leaning economic priorities. The article emphasizes the need to attract high-net-worth investors,

Why factuality (90): The article reports on a decline in the number of UK millionaires using data from the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), which is sourced from the National Office for Statistics. It provides context such as falling asset prices, HNWIs leaving the UK, and a low saving rate. The article explains the methodol

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the findings of the Adam Smith Institute, which is a right-leaning think tank, and includes commentary on potential policy changes favorable to the wealthy. This introduces a clear ideological perspective, particularly in discussing tax reforms and the implications of losing mil

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 6526 days ago
Number of millionaires in Britain falls to the lowest it has been in 20 years

The number of millionaires in Britain has dropped to the lowest level in 20 years, according to a report by the free-market think tank Adam Smith Institute (ASI). The decline, attributed to high taxation, threats of a wealth tax, the abolition of the non-dom regime, and falling asset prices, has led to concerns over economic impact. The ASI argues that the exodus of millionaires harms the economy by reducing capital, international connections, and entrepreneurial activity. The report cites data from the ONS Wealth and Assets Survey and warns that the trend could mirror experiences in France, Austria, and the Netherlands. Tory business spokesman Andrew Griffith expressed concern over the loss of contributors to the tax base and job creation.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the decline in millionaires as a negative consequence of Labour's tax policies, particularly highlighting the threat of a wealth tax and the impact of high taxation on wealth creators. It emphasizes the potential economic harm and suggests that the current trajectory mirrors past,

Why factuality (85): The article cites the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) report and references the ONS Wealth and Assets survey as its data source. It provides specific numbers (442,000 millionaires, 7% decrease) and attributes the decline to factors like high taxation, wealth tax proposals, and changes in immigration poli

Why objectivity (65): The article takes a clear stance in favor of free-market policies and criticizes Labour's economic approach, using emotionally charged language such as 'haemorrhaging wealth' and 'misguided.' It also presents the ASI as an authoritative voice without acknowledging potential biases, leading to a one-

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories