The article critiques the Daily Trust's coverage of Nuhu Ribadu, arguing that the newspaper has engaged in character assassination and biased reporting against him. It claims that Daily Trust consistently seeks out scandals, inflates disagreements, and stretches political speculation into factual reports when covering Ribadu. The author defends Ribadu, asserting that he possesses 'shared trust and proven competence' and that attempts to interpret his appointment as a referendum on him are based on flawed reasoning.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a specific individual and their portrayal in the media but does not present a clear ideological slant. It criticizes the Daily Trust's approach to reporting on Nuhu Ribadu without explicitly aligning with any particular political stance. The content remains focused on media scr





