ON
← Back to feed
New setback against Christian Lawyers: the Supreme Court rejects another of their attempts to curb historical memory
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

New setback against Christian Lawyers: the Supreme Court rejects another of their attempts to curb historical memory

The Spanish Supreme Court has rejected another legal challenge by the ultra-Catholic organization Abogados Cristianos against measures aimed at preserving historical memory. The court dismissed their appeal against the creation of two institutions mandated by law in 2022, the Council of Democratic Memory and the State Register of Memorial Entities. These entities aim to promote the preservation and dissemination of historical memory, particularly regarding the persecution of religious communities during the Spanish Civil War. The court ruled that Abogados Cristianos lacks the legal standing to challenge the decree, as their stated objectives, such as defending Christians and promoting religious freedom, are too broad and unrelated to the specific legislation being challenged. The ruling underscores the court’s stance that the organizations’ claims of ideological bias and suppression of alternative narratives lack sufficient basis.

1 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
New setback against Christian Lawyers: the Supreme Court rejects another of their attempts to curb historical memory

The Spanish Supreme Court has rejected another legal challenge by the ultra-Catholic organization Abogados Cristianos against measures aimed at preserving historical memory. The court dismissed their appeal against the creation of two institutions mandated by law in 2022, the Council of Democratic Memory and the State Register of Memorial Entities. These entities aim to promote the preservation and dissemination of historical memory, particularly regarding the persecution of religious communities during the Spanish Civil War. The court ruled that Abogados Cristianos lacks the legal standing to challenge the decree, as their stated objectives, such as defending Christians and promoting religious freedom, are too broad and unrelated to the specific legislation being challenged. The ruling underscores the court’s stance that the organizations’ claims of ideological bias and suppression of alternative narratives lack sufficient basis.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue involving historical memory and religious persecution, the framing remains balanced. It presents both the arguments of Abogados Cristianos and the court’s counterpoints without overtly favoring either side. The language does not exhibit clear

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories