ON
← Back to feed
The reporter hadn't used a blender in a month, what did she find out?
Slovenia🏛️ Politics13 days ago

The reporter hadn't used a blender in a month, what did she find out?

A journalist from the UK, Sophie Harris, decided to stop using fabric softener for a month to see if there were any benefits. She found that her clothes did not lose their softness and remained just as comfortable, though they no longer had the strong scent typically associated with fabric softeners. The most notable change was in the performance of her cleaning cloths, which absorbed water much better after four washes without fabric softener. Harris noted that the cloths were less soft but significantly more effective at cleaning. She also observed that her sports clothing stayed fresher for longer and that her washing machine remained cleaner and fresher without the buildup often caused by fabric softener. Additionally, she found that avoiding fabric softener led to cost savings over time.

A British journalist has revealed she went a month without using fabric softener and found unexpected benefits, including improved performance of her cleaning cloths and savings on household expenses. The experiment, conducted by Sophie Harris, a writer known for practical advice, highlights growing concerns over the necessity of fabric softeners in laundry routines. Harris had long used fabric softener out of habit and because of its pleasant scent, which lasts several days. However, after reading research suggesting that fabric softeners can coat fibers with a wax-like layer, potentially reducing the lifespan of certain fabrics and affecting their performance, she decided to stop using them for one month. Her findings were shared with The Express newspaper. In the initial weeks, Harris noticed that her clothes lacked the intense, familiar scent usually left behind by fabric softener. Yet, aside from this, she observed little difference. Shirts and undergarments looked just as clean and fresh after drying, while towels felt slightly softer than before. This surprised her, given the common belief that fabric softeners enhance comfort and reduce static cling. The biggest surprise came with her cleaning cloths. After four washes without fabric softener, Harris noted that they absorbed water much better than usual. While they weren't as soft as before, they proved significantly more effective at wiping surfaces clean. As a result, she decided to replace fabric softener with white vinegar during some washes, which softens fibers without compromising absorbency. Sportswear also showed improvements. Harris remarked that her athletic clothing remained fresher for longer periods, even after being worn multiple times. She attributed this to the absence of fabric softener, which might have otherwise left residues that could affect odor retention. Another notable benefit was the cleanliness of her washing machine. Initially worried about losing the strong scent typically associated with fabric softeners, Harris quickly adapted to the idea that her clothes simply smelled clean, without overpowering perfumes. Additionally, the machine stayed cleaner and fresher, free from the buildup often found in the detergent compartment where fabric softeners are added. Harris emphasized the financial advantages of reducing fabric softener usage. Although each individual wash saves relatively little money, the cumulative effect becomes noticeable over time. Households that do laundry frequently can see a reduction in monthly expenses. Experts from the company Persil recommend using fabric softener for specific items such as hand towels, bath towels, microfiber cloths, and kitchen cloths. They also suggest that individuals with sensitive skin may find fabric softeners beneficial, as they can reduce roughness and make certain materials more comfortable against the skin. Despite these recommendations, Harris's experience suggests that fabric softener is not always essential. Her findings align with broader discussions around consumer habits and environmental impact, prompting many to reconsider whether fabric softener is a necessary addition to their laundry routine.

1 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 8513 days ago
The reporter hadn't used a blender in a month, what did she find out?

A journalist from the UK, Sophie Harris, decided to stop using fabric softener for a month to see if there were any benefits. She found that her clothes did not lose their softness and remained just as comfortable, though they no longer had the strong scent typically associated with fabric softeners. The most notable change was in the performance of her cleaning cloths, which absorbed water much better after four washes without fabric softener. Harris noted that the cloths were less soft but significantly more effective at cleaning. She also observed that her sports clothing stayed fresher for longer and that her washing machine remained cleaner and fresher without the buildup often caused by fabric softener. Additionally, she found that avoiding fabric softener led to cost savings over time.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal experience with fabric softener usage and its effects on laundry and household expenses. It does not involve political figures, policies, or contentious issues. The content is focused on consumer behavior and product impact, making it apolitical in nature.

Why factuality (92): The article accurately reports on the journalist's experience of stopping using fabric softener for a month, citing specific details from her account such as the lack of noticeable difference in clothing quality and the unexpected softness of flannel. It also references research findings about poten

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a generally neutral tone, presenting both the journalist’s personal experience and expert opinions without overt bias. However, it slightly emphasizes the benefits of avoiding fabric softener by highlighting the positive outcomes of the experiment, which could subtly influence

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories