Združenje novinarjev in publicistov Slovenije (ZNP), vodeno z Luku Svetino, je v zadnjem času izrazilo resno zaskrbljenost in protest zaradi navedb mednarodne organizacije Novinarji brez meja (RSF), ki so trdili, da bi novi slovenski zakon o parlamentarni preiskavi "slabil zaščito novinarjev" in omogočal "razkritje novinarskih virov". Te trditve, ki so bile objavljene v okviru globalne debate o svobodi medijev, so bile smatrane za popolnoma neutemeljene in zavajajoče. ZNP je zapisal, da te navedbe izvirajo iz domačih aktivističnih krogov in da ne temeljijo na dejanskem besedilu zakona.
Zakon o parlamentarni preiskavi, ki je bil predmet kontroverse, je bil predlog za spremembo, ki je vključevala spremembe v 4. in 8. členu. ZNP je po pregledu teh sprememb ugotovil, da v njih ni nobene določbe, ki bi novinarjem nalagala razkritje virov, niti nobene določbe, ki bi parlamentarnim preiskovalnim komisijam podeljevala nove pristojnosti v tej smeri. Nasprotno, spremenjeni 4. člen izrecno določa, da se v postopku parlamentarne preiskave zagotavljata varstvo tajnosti pisem in drugih občil ter nedotakljivost človekove zasebnosti. Določba o pravni pomoči iz 8. člena novele, ki spreminja 13. člen zakona, pa določa, da so sodišča in drugi državni organi dolžni preiskovalni komisiji nuditi potrebno pravno pomoč. ZNP je menil, da se ta določba nanaša na sodelovanje sodišč in drugih državnih organov, ne pa na novinarje, medije ali novinarske vire, in zato ni mogoče razumeti kot pravno podlago za zaobid tega, kar ščiti novinarje in njihove vire.
Dodatno je ZNP poudaril, da zakon o medijih, ki se ne spreminja, jasno določa, da novinarji niso dolžni razkriti svojih virov. V 6. členu tega zakona se natančno določa, da morajo novinarji zagotoviti zaupnost vira informacij. Prav tako se novinarjev ne sme pridržati, preiskovati in kaznovati, da bi se pridobile informacije, povezane z novinarskimi viri ali zaupnim komuniciranjem, razen če se takšni ukrepi uporabijo na podlagi odločbe sodišča. ZNP je zato ocenil, da trditev, da bi bilo mogoče zakon o parlamentarni preiskavi uporabiti za razkritje novinarskih virov, ni utemeljena in zavajajoča.
Organizacija Novinarji brez meja, ki je v svojih izjavih podprla navedbe o zlorabi zakona, je bila pozvana, naj javno navede konkretno določbo, ki bi omogočala takšno posledico, in pojasni pravno argumentacijo. Če takšne določbe ni, je bilo pričakovano, da bo organizacija objavila popravek oziroma pojasnilo navedenih trditev. ZNP je hkrati pozdravljal vsako iskreno prizadevanje za zaščito svobode medijev, novinarske neodvisnosti in zaščito novinarskih virov, vendar je zavračal prakso, po kateri se skrb za svobodo medijev selektivno uporablja kot politično orodje v kampanjah proti desnosredinskim vladam ali političnim opcijam, s katerimi se posamezni akterji ideološko ne strinjajo.
Mednarodne organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo s svobodo medijev, imajo pomembno vlogo in zato tudi posebno odgovornost. Njihove ocene morajo temeljiti na dejstvih, pravni natančnosti in uravnoteženih informacijah, ne pa na politično motiviranih interpretacijah domačih aktivističnih krogov. ZNP je zato opozoril, da širjenje trditve, da slovenska zakonodaja omogoča razkritje novinarskih virov, ne da bi bila za to navedena konkretna pravna podlaga, tvega zavajanje mednarodne javnosti in načenja verodostojnost legitimnih prizadevanj za zaščito novinarjev tam, kjer je ta zaščita resnično ogrožena. S tem se škoduje novinarstvu kot stroki, saj se zmanjšuje zaupanje javnosti v novinarske organizacije.
V skladu z izjavo ZNP-a, ki je bila objavljena na spletnem časopisu, je bilo pričakovano, da bo organizacija Novinarji brez meja ponovno preverila informacije, ki jih je prejela iz Slovenije, jih primerjala z dejanskim besedilom zakona in objavila ustrezen popravek oziroma pojasnilo. To je bilo potrebno, da bi se zmanjšala možnost zavajanja in da bi se ohranila verodostojnost mednarodnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo s svobodo medijev. ZNP je tako zaznamoval svoj odziv z izrazom, da pozdravlja vsako prizadevanje za zaščito svobode medijev, hkrati pa zavrača prakso, po kateri se skrb za svobodo medijev uporablja kot politično orodje.
5 reports
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 9216 days agoThe Slovenian Journalists' Association (ZNP) has expressed serious concern and protested against statements made by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) suggesting that a referendum was being organized in Slovenia against a new law that would allegedly weaken protections for journalists and allow the disclosure of journalistic sources. ZNP emphasizes that protecting journalistic sources is fundamental to press freedom and asserts that any legal provision requiring journalists to disclose their sources would be unacceptable. After reviewing the proposed changes to the Law on Parliamentary Inquiry, Z
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a protest by a professional organization regarding concerns over potential threats to journalistic source protection. The content focuses on factual claims and legal interpretations without overtly favoring any political side. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing the need for
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 92): The article presents detailed analysis of the law changes and directly addresses the claims made by Reporters Without Borders. It provides specific references to legal provisions and explains why they do not support the allegations. The facts align with the cross-source consensus, though there is so
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8514 days ago Reporters Without Borders LiesThe Slovenian Journalists' Association (ZNP), led by Luka Svetina, has protested against claims made by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) regarding a new Slovenian law on parliamentary inquiry. The ZNP states that RSF's allegations—that the law weakens journalist protection and allows the disclosure of journalistic sources—are completely unfounded and based on domestic activist circles. The ZNP emphasizes that the proposed changes to the law do not include any provisions requiring journalists to disclose their sources or granting new powers to parliamentary inquiry committees in this regard.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct response from the Slovenian Journalists' Association to international claims about a new law, without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on refuting specific allegations and does not exhibit biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The lea
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the ZNP's protest against RSF's claims, citing their statement that the new law does not require journalists to disclose sources. However, the tone is strongly critical of RSF, using terms like 'completely fabricated' and 'misleading,' which may affect objectivity.
Spletni časopisIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 8316 days agoThe Slovenian Journalists' Association (ZNP), led by Luka Svetina, has strongly protested against claims made by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) regarding a new Slovenian law on parliamentary inquiry. The ZNP states that RSF's allegations—that the law weakens journalist protection and allows the disclosure of journalistic sources—are completely unfounded and based on domestic activist circles. The ZNP emphasizes that the proposed changes to the law do not include any provisions requiring journalists to disclose their sources or granting parliamentary inquiry committees new powers in this area.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct response from the Slovenian Journalists' Association to an international organization's claims. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the disagreement between two entities. There is no evident framing bias, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 83): This article closely mirrors the first, repeating the same claims from ZNP regarding the lack of provisions in the law requiring disclosure of sources. It provides similar details but lacks additional context or counterpoints, slightly reducing its objectivity score.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 8016 days agoThe Association of Journalists and Writers of Slovenia (ZNP) has protested against claims made by Reporters Without Borders (Novinarji brez meja) regarding a proposed law on parliamentary inquiry. The ZNP argues that these claims are misleading and lack foundation. They emphasize that protecting journalistic sources is a fundamental aspect of press freedom and that any legal provision requiring journalists to disclose their sources would be unacceptable. The ZNP also states that upon reviewing the specific law, they found no provisions mandating journalists to reveal their sources.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of the ZNP's response to claims made by an international organization without taking a stance on the validity of either side's arguments. It does not exhibit biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article accurately summarizes the ZNP's concerns about RSF's claims and highlights the absence of relevant legal provisions. While it maintains a formal tone, it still leans toward supporting the ZNP's position more than presenting a balanced view.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago Left activists are exporting lies abroadThe article claims that members of Slovenia's transitional left are spreading false information both domestically and internationally, including through the international NGO 'Journalists Without Borders' (RSF). It references an organization called 'Politična policija,' created by activists from the Slovenian transitional left, which allegedly spreads unverified claims about a proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry. The article criticizes RSF for promoting these claims and suggests a connection between domestic NGOs and international actors.
Bias read (Right): The article uses strong language such as 'brezobzirno lagati' ('recklessly lying') and frames the actions of left-wing activists and their allies negatively, suggesting collusion with international entities. It presents the claims made by 'Journalists Without Borders' as unverified and misleading, a
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article presents the ZNP's response but also includes subjective commentary suggesting RSF is spreading unverified information and linking them to domestic activists. This introduces bias and reduces objectivity significantly.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
