Former HDZ head of diplomacy: "Nothing is excluded, not even the AfD taking power in Germany in 2029"

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 859/8/2026

In an interview with HRT's 'Studio 4', former Croatian Foreign Minister Miro Kovač commented on the strong performance of Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in Saxony-Anhalt. He noted that AfD successfully tapped into voter emotions by addressing migration policies and dissatisfaction with federal governance and Western attitudes toward eastern Germans. Kovač highlighted the region's population loss since reunification and suggested that AfD's appeal lies in nostalgia for a bygone era of greater social security and pacifism. While AfD won 44% of the vote, it lacks enough seats to form a government alone. Kovač warned that entering regional governance could become a trap if the party fails to meet voter expectations before the next federal election in 2029. He also criticized German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for needing to implement necessary reforms despite potential short-term political costs. Additionally, Kovač expressed concern over the burial of war criminal Ratko Mladić in Belgrade, noting the lack of condemnation from Serbian authorities and calling it a reflection of broader issues with international justice.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of political developments in Germany and related international issues, including the rise of the AfD party and the implications of the burial of Ratko Mladić. The framing remains neutral, avoiding overtly biased language or selective emphasis on particular側

Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the content of the primary source document, accurately quoting Miro Kovač’s analysis of the AfD’s victory, the reasons behind it, and his warnings about political risks. It provides direct quotes and contextual information that match the original source, with minimal dev

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Kovač’s statements without apparent bias. It avoids emotionally charged language and focuses on reporting the expert opinion without injecting personal commentary. The structure is balanced, offering both analysis and cautionary remarks without leanin

N1 HrvatskaIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 609/7/2026

Journalist Tomislav Krasnec from Večernji list attended the election night in the German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt at the headquarters of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. He described the atmosphere among voters, noting both confirmation of AfD's image as an extreme-right party with neo-Nazi tendencies and the frustration of some voters who feel ignored by traditional political parties. Krasnec observed signs of fear and concern among people regarding their economic and social situations, suggesting that these feelings drive support for AfD. He noted the visual style of AfD's campaign booth resembled the aesthetics of Slovenian artists Laibach and Neue Slowenische Kunst, including slogans like 'Remigration' and images of airplanes. Krasnec warned that such policies could affect Croatia if migrants were returned to countries where they previously registered. He emphasized that AfD's growth cannot be explained solely by ideological extremism but also by voter dissatisfaction with mainstream parties.

Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights the rise of the AfD, an extreme-right party in Germany, and describes its imagery and rhetoric, which include references to neo-Nazism and 'Remigration.' The journalist notes the party’s appeal to voters frustrated with traditional parties and emphasizes the party’s focus on '

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a journalist’s experience at an AfD campaign office during election night, describing the atmosphere, iconography, and public sentiment. It aligns with the primary source document by referencing the AfD’s success and the factors behind it, such as migration policy and dissatis

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat subjective, with the journalist expressing personal impressions and interpretations of the AfD’s image and public reaction. While it does not overtly take sides, the emphasis on certain aspects like the AfD’s extreme right positioning and the fear among voters may reflect a part