Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives4 hr. ago

A new complaint about the Infantino, Fifi and Moku are keeping quiet about it.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has received a complaint against FIFA President Gianni Infantino over his interactions with U.S. President Donald Trump, specifically during the handling of a disciplinary case involving American attacker Folarin Balogun. The complaint alleges violations of political neutrality rules, citing five clear breaches and evidence of two additional serious violations. The complaint was filed by the British human rights organization FairSquare, which previously submitted a similar complaint to FIFA’s ethics committee last December. The complaint highlights concerns over FIFA’s decision to temporarily lift a ban on Balogun’s participation in a World Cup match, a move made independently by the head of FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee, Mohammad Al Kamali, despite having no prior record of acting as sole arbiter. Additionally, there were calls for an investigation into the awarding of the FIFA Peace Prize to Trump, which was presented to Infantino by Trump in December 2023. Despite these allegations, neither FIFA nor the IOC has yet commented on the complaints.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has received a new complaint against FIFA President Gianni Infantino over alleged violations of political neutrality rules during his interactions with U.S. President Donald Trump. The complaint was filed by the British human rights organization FairSquare, which outlines five clear breaches of IOC regulations regarding political impartiality, along with evidence suggesting two additional serious violations. This follows similar complaints submitted in previous years, including one in December last year to FIFA's ethics committee. The controversy centers around a phone call between Trump and Infantino, which occurred after the disciplinary committee of FIFA overturned a ban on American player Folarin Balogun, allowing him to play in a World Cup quarter-final match against Belgium. According to reports, this decision came despite the lack of any prior explanation from FIFA regarding why the suspension had been lifted. The Times newspaper noted that the key decision to lift the ban was made independently by Mohamed Al-Khamali, head of FIFA’s disciplinary committee, who had previously never acted alone in such cases. FairSquare’s latest complaint highlights several specific instances of potential rule-breaking. It points to the awarding of FIFA’s Peace Prize to Trump in December last year, which the Norwegian Football Federation (NFF) requested an investigation into. The NFF wrote to FIFA’s ethics committee, asking them to examine whether the prize was awarded in accordance with the governing body’s rules. FIFA has yet to provide any clarification on the circumstances surrounding the award or the criteria used to select Trump as recipient. In addition to the NFF’s inquiry, fifty members of the European Parliament sent a letter to FIFA’s ethics committee on June 29, urging them to investigate the issue of the Peace Prize. These developments have raised concerns about the extent to which FIFA maintains political neutrality in its operations, particularly given the high-profile nature of the individuals involved. The initial complaint from FairSquare dates back to December last year, when they submitted a similar case to FIFA’s ethics committee. This indicates a pattern of concern over potential ethical lapses involving Infantino and his dealings with political figures. The current complaint adds further weight to these concerns, emphasizing the need for transparency and adherence to established guidelines. Both FIFA and the IOC have remained silent on the matter thus far. Neither organization has issued any statements or responses to the allegations raised by FairSquare, nor have they addressed the requests for investigations from the NFF and the European Parliament representatives. As a result, the situation continues to unfold without official comment from the relevant bodies, leaving the validity of the claims unaddressed.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday

A new complaint about the Infantino, Fifi and Moku are keeping quiet about it.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against FIFA President Gianni Infantino through the lens of political neutrality and ethical governance, aligning with progressive values. It emphasizes the involvement of international human rights organizations and criticizes FIFA’s lack of transparency regarding

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports on a complaint against Infantino regarding political neutrality, citing specific instances like the interaction with Trump and disciplinary decisions. It references external sources like dpa and FairSquare, aligning with cross-source consensus. However, it presents the complaint

Siol.netState / PublicProgressive4 hr. ago

A blow for Fifa, the Velesila has let the Infantino know he's had enough.

The article discusses controversy surrounding FIFA President Gianni Infantino following a contentious incident at the 2026 World Cup. European football authorities, particularly Germany’s DFB, have expressed dissatisfaction with his decisions, notably the controversial 'Balogun case' where U.S. President Donald Trump intervened to allow a player to continue playing despite receiving a red card. This has led to criticism across Europe and prompted some leaders, like Bernd Neuendorf, to withdraw support for Infantino’s re-election bid. Meanwhile, the British human rights organization FairSquare has filed a complaint against Infantino with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), accusing him of violating political neutrality rules due to his close ties with Trump, including awarding him a peace prize and collaboration within Trump’s peace circle. The IOC president, Kirsty Coventry, has indicated that this issue will be addressed, but Infantino still holds strong support from African, Asian, and South American members, giving him a good chance of securing another term.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around FIFA President Gianni Infantino's perceived alignment with former U.S. President Donald Trump, which is portrayed as a violation of political neutrality by the International Olympic Committee. While the issue itself is politically charged, the article leans左

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

A new complaint about the Infantino, Fifi and Moku are keeping quiet about it.

How each side covered it

progressive

center

conservative

How each side covered it

Covered around the world

Covered around the world

Claims check

Claims check

2 reports

Keep the news honest.

Related stories

Serious allegations have come to light for Infantino: can I bring down the most powerful man in world football?

Sleep informed with the movements of this July 8, 2026

Another reaction to FIFA's scandalous decision.

Liveblog FIFA World Cup 2026: DFB refuses to sign for the re-election of Infantino

England-Argentina dominates Keir Starmer’s final parliament grilling

Mexico presents report on El Mayo today